Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation applied to the skin results in a desensitization of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. In a companion paper, we describe the dependence of the threshold shift on the parameters of the adapting stimulus and discuss neural mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Here we describe the time-course of afferent adaptation and recovery. We found that absolute and entrainment thresholds rise and fall exponentially during adaptation and recovery with time constants that vary with fiber type. slowly adapting type I (SA1) afferents adapt most rapidly, and pacinian (PC) afferents adapt most slowly, whereas rapidly adapting (RA) afferents exhibit intermediate rates of adaptation; SA1 fibers also recover more rapidly from adaptation than RA and PC fibers. We also showed that threshold adaptation is accompanied by a shift in the timing of the spikes within individual cycles of the adapting stimulus (i.e., a shift in the impulse phase). We invoked an integrate-and-fire model to explore possible mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Finally, we found that the time-course of afferent adaptation is more rapid than that of its psychophysical counterpart, as is the time-course of recovery from adaptation, suggesting that central factors play a role in the psychophysical phenomenon.

[1]  R. Skalak,et al.  Mechanical transmission in a Pacinian corpuscle. An analysis and a theory , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Chubbuck Small motion biological stimulator , 1966 .

[3]  Hahn Jf,et al.  Low-frequency vibrotactile adaptation. , 1968 .

[4]  J F Hahn Low-frequency vibrotactile adaptation. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  B. Berglund,et al.  Adaptation and Recovery in Vibrotactile Perception , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Rowe,et al.  Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[14]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Stability of rapidly adapting afferent entrainment vs responsivity. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[16]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.