Linking strategy and performance: Developments in the New Zealand public sector

In recent decades, many governments have sought to improve their systems of strategic management and priority setting. Few of these attempts have met with unequivocal success. In particular, the systems for “whole-of-government strategizing” have not been well integrated into the ongoing budgetary processes and departmental performance management systems. In 1993-1994, as part of its comprehensive reforms of the public sector, the New Zealand government instituted a new system of strategic management. The new approach-which in part grew out of the National government's attempt to outline its long-term vision in a document titled Path to 2010-involves the ministers specifying a series of medium-term policy goals, referred to as “strategic result areas” (SRAs), and then translating these into more detailed departmental objectives, known as “key result areas” (KRAs). More specific “milestones” are subsequently identified to serve as benchmarks against which the achievement of departmental KRAs can be assessed. This article describes and evaluates this new approach and considers its possible application in other countries.

[1]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Strategy and Leadership , 1994 .

[2]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Tracking Strategy in an Entrepreneurial Firm1 , 1982 .

[3]  Carl E. Giese,et al.  Handbook of Leadership; a Survey of Theory and Research , 1974 .

[4]  James C. Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[5]  Jonathan Boston,et al.  The Problems of Policy Coordination: The New Zealand Experience , 1992 .

[6]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[7]  J. McCann Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[8]  J. Boston High level advisory groups: The case of the priorities review staff , 1980 .

[9]  P. Drucker,et al.  管理的实践=The practice of management , 1954 .

[10]  James A. Desveaux Anticipating Uncertainty: The Strategy-Structure Problem in Public Bureaucracy , 1994 .

[11]  Burt Nanus,et al.  Visionary Leadership: Creating a Compelling Sense of Direction for Your Organization , 1992 .

[12]  C. Lindblom Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. , 1979 .

[13]  J. Boston,et al.  New Zealand Under MMP: A New Politics? , 1996 .

[14]  J. C. Campbell,et al.  Advising the rulers , 1988 .

[15]  J. Boston Reshaping the state : New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution , 1993 .

[16]  G. Scott,et al.  Reform of the Core Public Sector: New Zealand Experience , 1990 .

[17]  G. Scott,et al.  New Zealand's public sector management reform: Implications for the United States , 1997 .

[18]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[19]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .