Accounting for Surface Refraction in Velocity Semblance Analysis With Air-Coupled GPR

The aim of this study is to evaluate the velocity semblance analysis technique for air-coupled common midpoint (CMP) measurements with a small antenna offset. The technique was originally developed for seismic surveys, assuming the small spread approximation. Owing to the strong refraction at the surface and shallow investigation depth, this assumption is not valid in the case of air-coupled ground-penetrating radar (GPR). To overcome this assumption, a modification to the method is proposed accounting for the refraction at the surface. Synthetic experiments were executed to demonstrate that the traditional method resulted in a persistent overestimation, whereas the modified method improved the results significantly. Two field experiments have been conducted to test the method under different field conditions. In a first experiment on a road test site, the modified method improved the estimation of depth and propagation velocity significantly. However, the technique failed to estimate the propagation velocity and depth or objects in a second field test, due to rough terrain conditions and noise in the data. Therefore, an additional modification was proposed, by incorporating in-line data as well. This improved the depth and velocity estimations significantly. Overall, this study demonstrates that the traditional velocity semblance analysis (TRAD) is not valid for air-coupled GPR. By accounting for the refraction at the surface and incorporating inline data, it is possible to successfully estimate depth and propagation velocity with small offset air-coupled GPR configurations.

[1]  Christiane Maierhofer,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Infrastructure with Ground Penetrating Radar , 2003 .

[2]  John H. Bradford,et al.  Estimating porosity with ground‐penetrating radar reflection tomography: A controlled 3‐D experiment at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site , 2009 .

[3]  M. Turhan Taner,et al.  Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions , 1969 .

[4]  Eric de Bazelaire Normal Moveout Revisited: Inhomogeneous Media And Curved Interfaces , 1986 .

[5]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset, ground-penetrating radar , 1996 .

[6]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[7]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar , 2003 .

[8]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  An innovative method for measuring pavement dielectric constant using the extended CMP method with two air-coupled GPR systems , 2014 .

[9]  T. Scullion,et al.  Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar , 2000 .

[10]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Development of data analysis algorithms for interpretation of ground-penetrating radar data , 2003 .

[11]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Iron oxides as a cause of GPR reflections , 2002 .

[12]  J. Tukey,et al.  An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series , 1965 .

[13]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  Processing Ground Penetrating Radar Data To Improve Resolution Of Near-Surface Targets , 1993 .

[14]  Jiabao Zhang,et al.  Estimating field-scale soil water dynamics at a heterogeneous site using multi-channel GPR , 2011 .

[15]  R. J. Castle,et al.  A theory of normal moveout , 1994 .

[16]  J.B. Schneider Plane waves in FDTD simulations and a nearly perfect total-field/scattered-field boundary , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[17]  Jean-Claude Dubois,et al.  Analysis of GPR data: wave propagation velocity determination , 1995 .

[18]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Ray‐based synthesis of bistatic ground‐penetrating radar profiles , 1995 .

[19]  T. Murray,et al.  Influences on the resolution of GPR velocity analyses and a Monte Carlo simulation for establishing velocity precision , 2011 .

[20]  George Vellidis,et al.  Detecting wetting front movement in a sandy soil with ground-penetrating radar , 1990 .

[21]  A. P. Annan Chapter 1 – Electromagnetic Principles of Ground Penetrating Radar , 2009 .

[22]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  High-resolution space–time quantification of soil moisture along a hillslope using joint analysis of ground penetrating radar and frequency domain reflectometry data , 2015 .

[23]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[24]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Shongtao Dai,et al.  Evaluating asphalt concrete air void variation via GPR antenna array data , 2015 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[27]  Amir M. Alani,et al.  Innovative inspection procedures for effective GPR surveying of critical transport infrastructures (pavements, bridges and tunnels) , 2015 .

[28]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[29]  Tavi Murray,et al.  Semblance response to a ground-penetrating radar wavelet and resulting errors in velocity analysis , 2010 .

[30]  Seong-Jun Cho,et al.  Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing , 2007 .

[31]  John H. Bradford,et al.  Snow stratigraphy over a uniform depositional surface: spatial variability and measurement tools , 2003 .

[32]  G. Klysz,et al.  Use of capacitive and GPR techniques for the non-destructive evaluation of cover concrete , 2008 .

[33]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Python Bindings for the Open Source Electromagnetic Simulator Meep , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[34]  R. Yelf,et al.  Where is true time zero ? , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[35]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Acquisition and processing of wide-aperture ground-penetrating radar data , 1992 .

[36]  Analysis of multi-offset GPR data: a case study in a coarse-grained gravel aquifer , 2006 .

[37]  Robert B. Smith,et al.  Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure , 1992 .

[38]  J. Tronicke,et al.  Global inversion of GPR traveltimes to assess uncertainties in CMP velocity models , 2014 .

[39]  C. H. Dix SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTS , 1955 .

[40]  Y. Rubin,et al.  GPR Monitoring of Volumetric Water Content in Soils Applied to Highway Construction and Maintenance , 2002 .

[41]  J. Vrugt,et al.  On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review , 2008 .

[42]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Assessing vertical soil moisture dynamics using multi-frequency GPR common-midpoint soundings , 2012 .

[43]  Nigel J. Cassidy,et al.  Chapter 2 – Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Rocks, Soils and Fluids , 2009 .