Prosodic patterning in distal speech context: Effects of list intonation and f0 downtrend on perception of proximal prosodic structure

Abstract Prosodic structure is often perceived as exhibiting regularities in the patterning of tone sequences or stressed syllables. Recently, prosodic regularities in the distal (non-local) context have been shown to influence the perceived prosodic constituency of syllables. Three experiments tested the nature of distal prosodic patterns influencing perceptions of prosodic structure, using eight-syllable items ending in ambiguous lexical structures (e.g., tie murder bee, timer derby). For distinct combinations of distal fundamental frequency (f0) and/or timing cues, two patterns were resynthesized on the initial five syllables of experimental items; these were predicted to favor prosodic grouping of final syllables such that listeners would hear a final disyllabic or monosyllabic word, respectively. Results showed distal prosodic patterning affected perceived prosodic constituency when (1) patterns consisted of regularity in timing cues, f0 cues, or both (Experiments 1–2); (2) items ended with either a low–high (Experiment 1) or a high–low (Experiment 2) tonal pattern; and (3) tonal patterns consisted of alternating low and high-pitched syllables with progressive f0 decrease, i.e., a ‘downtrend’ (Experiment 3). The results reveal that a variety of prosodic patterns in the distal context can influence perceived prosodic constituency and thus lexical processing, and provide a perceptually-motivated explanation for the organization of acoustic speech input into prosodic constituents.

[1]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[3]  J. Pierrehumbert The perception of fundamental frequency declination. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. Devin McAuley Tempo and Rhythm , 2010 .

[5]  I. Lehiste The Phonetic Structure of Paragraphs , 1975 .

[6]  Maria Schubiger English intonation, its form and function , 1958 .

[7]  G. Fant,et al.  Auditory analysis and perception of speech , 1975 .

[8]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[9]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[10]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  When cues combine: How distal and proximal acoustic cues are integrated in word segmentation , 2013 .

[11]  M. Boltz The generation of temporal and melodic expectancies during musical listening , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Laurence White,et al.  Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[13]  S. Handel Listening As Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events , 1989 .

[14]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[16]  J. Devin McAuley,et al.  Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Haruo Kubozono Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese , 1989, Phonology.

[18]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Streeter Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Audra Dainora,et al.  An empirically based probabilistic model of intonation in American English , 2001 .

[22]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[23]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Prosodic Breaks and Attachment Decisions in Sentence Parsing. , 1996 .

[24]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  Utterance preparation and stress clash: Planning prosodic alternations , 2012 .

[25]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Bengali intonational phonology , 1991 .

[26]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging. , 2009, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[27]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  Rhythm, Timing and the Timing of Rhythm , 2009, Phonetica.

[28]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[29]  G. Altmann Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[30]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation☆ , 2010 .

[31]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Tonal Elements and Their Alignment , 2000 .

[32]  David Crystal,et al.  Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English , 1969 .

[33]  Martine Grice,et al.  Leading tones and downstep in English , 1995, Phonology.

[34]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[35]  Larry M. Hyman Word-prosodic typology , 2006, Phonology.

[36]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[37]  Sven L Mattys,et al.  Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  J. Thomassen Melodic accent: Experiments and a tentative model , 1982 .

[39]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[40]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. , 1976, Psychological review.

[41]  Pauline Susan Welby,et al.  The Slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a Study of French Tonal Association and Alignment and their Role in Speech Segmentation , 2003 .

[42]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[43]  E. Couper-Kuhlen English speech rhythm , 1993 .

[44]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[45]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish , 1995 .

[46]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation , 1991 .

[47]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment , 2000 .

[48]  D. Schaffer The role of intonation as a cue to topic management in conversation , 1984 .

[49]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[51]  S. Khan Bengali intonational phonology , 2006 .

[52]  J. Pierrehumbert The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[53]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[54]  John J. Ohala,et al.  The Temporal Regulation of Speech , 1975 .

[55]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[56]  S. Jun The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody , 2018 .

[57]  A. Christophe,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  M. Jones,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays , 2002, Psychological science.

[59]  M G Ashby,et al.  A Study of Two English Nuclear Tones , 1978, Language and speech.

[60]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production , 2004 .

[61]  Sam Tilsen,et al.  Utterance preparation and Stress Clash : Planning prosodic alternations , 2012 .

[62]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Altering Context Speech Rate Can Cause Words to Appear or Disappear , 2010, Psychological science.

[63]  H. Akaike INFORMATION THEORY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 1973 .

[64]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing , 2008 .

[65]  Marc Swerts,et al.  Prosodic cues to discourse boundaries in experimental dialouges , 1994, Speech Communication.

[66]  K. Pike,et al.  The intonation of American English , 1946 .

[67]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond , 2010 .

[68]  M R Jones,et al.  Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Greg Kochanski,et al.  Connecting Intonation Labels to Mathematical Descriptions of Fundamental Frequency , 2007, Language and speech.

[70]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: the role of prosody , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[71]  Tom Barney English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction , 1994 .

[72]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[73]  David Poeppel,et al.  Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .

[74]  M. Swerts,et al.  Prosody as a Marker of Information Flow in Spoken Discourse , 1994 .

[75]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[76]  J. Hart,et al.  On the anatomy of intonation , 1968 .

[77]  L. Larkey,et al.  Reiterant speech: an acoustic and perceptual validation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[79]  R. Collier,et al.  Declination: Construct or Intrinsic Feature of Speech Pitch ? , 1982, Phonetica.

[80]  Peter Essens,et al.  Perception of Temporal Patterns , 1985 .

[81]  Louis ten Bosch,et al.  Automatic detection of prominence (as defined by listeners' judgements) in read aloud dutch sentences , 1998, ICSLP.

[82]  Jeung-Yoon Choi,et al.  Simultaneous recognition of words and prosody in the Boston University Radio Speech Corpus , 2005, Speech Commun..

[83]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[84]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Downstep in Dutch: implications for a model , 1992 .

[85]  Mark Hasegawa-Johnson,et al.  Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence , 2010 .

[86]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Dynamic attending and responses to time. , 1989, Psychological review.

[87]  F. Ramus,et al.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal , 1999, Cognition.

[88]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.