climify.org: an online solution for easy control and monitoring of the indoor environment

Real energy performance of new and retrofitted buildings often consistently differs from expectations. While occupants might complain about poor indoor climate, the energy use in such buildings is often higher than expected, leading to the well-known phenomenon called “Energy Performance Gap”. In the past years, monitoring of buildings, both in terms of energy use and indoor climate conditions, was realised mostly for office buildings only, and at high financial costs. However, the exponential growth in availability of IoT devices, over the last years, opens now new scenarios for low-cost monitoring and control solutions of buildings. Yet, modern IoT devices are often only accessible online through the vendors’ software, although some devices make use of open communication protocols and can, therefore, be connected to open platforms such as openHAB. However, the use of open platforms is still connected to a big efforts for many final users. We, therefore, propose climify.org, an open platform for plug and play connection of IoT sensors and actuators, for easy monitoring and controlling of buildings and buildings’ HVAC systems. The platform climify.org offers, at time of writing, three main applications. The first application is an IoT device installation app, to be used on portable devices (e.g. mobile phones or tablets of system administrators): this app allows easily installing and locating a sensor or an actuator, within a building. The second application is an online service for data visualisation and HVAC control: while the monitoring data can be plotted, the service offers several data evaluation methods; moreover, the settings of the connected actuators can be modified and controlled. The third application can be installed on portable devices (mobile phones and tablets of buildings’ occupants) and allows occupants to provide feedback on their perception of the indoor climate through several questionnaires’ formats. Through the three applications developed within climify.org, we aim at providing the best indoor climate and the lowest energy use through a low-cost solution.

[1]  Hans Auer,et al.  The impact of consumer behavior on residential energy demand for space heating , 1998 .

[2]  W. Fisk,et al.  Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2 Concentrations on Human Decision-Making Performance , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings , 2011 .

[4]  Stefano Paolo Corgnati,et al.  Total energy use in buildings -analysis and evaluation methods , 2011 .

[5]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  A cross-disciplinary path to healthy and energy efficient buildings , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[6]  Dirk Müller,et al.  Retrofit Solutions for Residential Buildings , 2011 .

[7]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  Comparison between predicted and actual energy performance for summer cooling in high-performance residential buildings in the Lombardy region (Italy) , 2012 .

[8]  Nazif Hülâgü Sohtaoǧlu.  Analysis of created value added in the electric power sector: a case study of Turkey , 1999 .

[9]  Rune Vinther Andersen,et al.  Effect of occupant behaviour related influencing factors on final energy end uses in buildings , 2011 .

[10]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  The sensitivity of building performance simulation results to the choice of occupants’ presence models: a case study , 2017 .

[11]  H. Madsen,et al.  Short-term heat load forecasting for single family houses , 2013 .

[12]  Jan Kloppenborg Møller,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for indirect classification of occupant behaviour , 2016 .

[13]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Model Predictive Control for a Smart Solar Tank Based on Weather and Consumption Forecasts , 2012 .

[14]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Making the ‘rebound effect’ more useful for performance evaluation of thermal retrofits of existing homes: Defining the ‘energy savings deficit’ and the ‘energy performance gap’ , 2014 .

[15]  Reinhard Haas,et al.  The rebound effect for space heating Empirical evidence from Austria , 2000 .

[16]  Bong-Ho Cho,et al.  Influence of VOC and formaldehyde emission from tile adhesives on their indoor concentrations in buildings , 2013 .

[17]  Rita Streblow,et al.  Energy performance gap in refurbished German dwellings: Lesson learned from a field test , 2016 .

[18]  Dirk Müller,et al.  Modelling diversity in building occupant behaviour: a novel statistical approach , 2017 .

[19]  Deo Prasad,et al.  Global Warming and the Built Environment , 1994 .

[20]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap , 2012 .

[21]  Dirk Müller,et al.  Occupants’ behavior and its impact upon the energy performance of buildings , 2017 .

[22]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Use of multi-layered PCM gypsums to improve fire response. Physical, thermal and mechanical characterization , 2016 .

[23]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Thermal Performance Characterization using Time Series Data - IEA EBC Annex 58 Guidelines , 2015 .

[24]  Hugo Hens.  Energy efficient retrofit of an end of the row house: Confronting predictions with long-term measurements , 2010 .