Screening Analysis for the Environmental Risk Evaluation System

The endangered Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKW) annually return to the inland marine waters of Washington (US) and British Columbia (CAN) to forage for their preferred prey of Chinook salmon. SRKW behavior has been parsed into four categories: foraging, socializing, resting, and traveling. Characteristics that include dive depth, dive frequency, directional or nondirectional movement, and swimming define each behavior. SRKW are known to make dives deeper than 50m while foraging, although they spend the majority of their time in the upper 30m of the water column. Due to this diving behavior, the SRKW may be at risk for interactions with the planned installation of tidal turbines in Admiralty Inlet, WA. The tidal turbines will sit on the seafloor, at approximately 60m deep, and use the energy in the movement of water from tidal changes to generate electricity. These devices do not cause the degree of environmental impact of conventional hydropower, and still hold the other benefits of reliable, clean energy generation. SRKW are listed under the Endangered Species Act and their safety post-installation of the tidal turbines must be assessed. Since there is little information that can be used to predict the risk of SRKW interaction due to difficulties associated with data collection, a conceptual behavioral model was developed to describe SRKW diving behavior and to quantify the frequency of dives in Admiralty Inlet to 50m. While there was insufficient data to parameterize the necessary variables quantitatively, the conceptual model has specified areas for future research so that a mathematical behavioral model can be created in the future. Introduction Emerging as an alternative energy source, marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) devices use the energy in waves and tides to generate electricity. The Snohomish Public Utilities District No. 1 (SnoPUD) wishes to install two OpenHydro tidal energy conversion turbines at a depth of approximately 60m in Admiralty Inlet at the mouth of Puget Sound as part of their energy source diversification [1]. Admiralty Inlet experiences mixed semidiurnal tides—where water flows in and out of the Sound as the tide shifts between two daily highs and low tides that can be used to generate electricity with bi-directional turbines [2]. Even though the turbine installation is likely to not cause significant environmental changes, like those associated with hydroelectric dams, there is concern that the turbines’ presence might affect marine populations including the endangered Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) (Wood, Tollit et al. 2009). Admiralty Inlet provides the only access to Puget Sound for the SRKW and potential risks to the transiting SRKW from the installation of tidal turbines must be evaluated.

[1]  K. Schiff,et al.  Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  J. Tougaard,et al.  Wind turbine underwater noise and marine mammals: implications of current knowledge and data needs , 2006 .

[3]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Harbour seals at Horns Reef before, during and after construction of Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm , 2006 .

[4]  A. Galston Fundamentals of Ecology , 1972, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[5]  M. Öhman,et al.  The influence of offshore windpower on demersal fish , 2006 .

[6]  L. Tuxen,et al.  Integrated risk information system (IRIS) , 1990 .

[7]  Chris Garrett,et al.  Limits to tidal current power , 2008 .

[8]  Gmi Boundary Data for the New Jersey Ocean/Wind Power Ecological Baseline Studies , 2010 .

[9]  Ronald D. Haynes,et al.  Assessment of tidal current energy in the Minas Passage, Bay of Fundy , 2008 .

[10]  Klaus-Michael Exo,et al.  Bird migration studies and potential collision risk with offshore wind turbines , 2006 .

[11]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[12]  Ian Bryden,et al.  Assessing the potential of a simple tidal channel to deliver useful energy , 2004 .

[13]  E. Ashe,et al.  Animal behaviour and marine protected areas: incorporating behavioural data into the selection of marine protected areas for an endangered killer whale population , 2010 .

[14]  Alan Henry,et al.  Design of the Next Generation of the Oyster Wave Energy Converter , 2010 .

[15]  Elizabeth A. Masden,et al.  Barriers to movement: impacts of wind farms on migrating birds , 2009 .

[16]  M. Witt,et al.  Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds , 2010 .

[17]  Beth E. Scott,et al.  Seabird conservation and tidal stream and wave power generation: Information needs for predicting and managing potential impacts , 2011 .

[18]  J. Ford,et al.  The social dynamics of southern resident killer whales and conservation implications for this endangered population , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  A. Gill Offshore renewable energy - ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. , 2005 .

[20]  S. Lambert,et al.  Assessment of the risk posed by the antifouling booster biocides Irgarol 1051 and diuron to freshwater macrophytes. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[21]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Factors influencing the diving behaviour of fish-eating killer whales: sex differences and diel and interannual variation in diving rates , 2005 .

[22]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  K. Mochida,et al.  Toxicity in Plankton and Fish , 2009 .

[24]  Frank Thomsen,et al.  Effects of offshore wind farm noise on marine mammals and fish , 2006 .

[25]  A. Finnie Improved estimates of environmental copper release rates from antifouling products , 2006, Biofouling.

[26]  John Haigh,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2003 .

[27]  J. Ford,et al.  Echolocation signals of free-ranging killer whales (Orcinus orca) and modeling of foraging for chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Ecological risk as a tool for evaluating the effects of offshore wind farm construction in the North Sea , 2008 .

[29]  P. E. Nachtigall,et al.  MARINE MAMMAL NOISE-EXPOSURE CRITERIA: INITIAL SCIENTIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS , 2008 .

[30]  Brian Polagye,et al.  Effect of large-scale kinetic power extraction on time-dependent estuaries , 2008 .

[31]  J. Köppel,et al.  Ecological Research on Offshore Wind Farms: International Exchange of Experiences , 2006 .

[32]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Implications of a zoned fishery management system for marine benthic communities , 2004 .

[33]  John K. B. Ford,et al.  Species and stock identification of prey consumed by endangered southern resident killer whales in their summer range , 2010 .

[34]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Dissolution rate measurements of sea water soluble pigments for antifouling paints: ZnO , 2006 .

[35]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Vessel traffic disrupts the foraging behavior of southern resident killer whales Orcinus orca , 2009 .

[36]  L. D. de Alencastro,et al.  Irgarol 1051, an Antifouling Compound in Freshwater, Sediment, and Biota of Lake Geneva , 1996, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[37]  P. Fraenkel Tidal Current Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[38]  Joanna Burger,et al.  Risk evaluation for federally listed (roseate tern, piping plover) or candidate (red knot) bird species in offshore waters: A first step for managing the potential impacts of wind facility development on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf , 2011 .

[39]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Magnetite-based magnetoreception , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Wellesley Site,et al.  What is an Ecological Risk Assessment ? , 2004 .

[41]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Persistent organic pollutants and stable isotopes in biopsy samples (2004/2006) from Southern Resident killer whales. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[42]  David Lusseau,et al.  Estimating relative energetic costs of human disturbance to killer whales (Orcinus orca) , 2006 .

[43]  R. Baird,et al.  DIET STUDIES OF “ SOUTHERN RESIDENT ” KILLER WHALES : PREY SAMPLING AND BEHAVIORAL CUES OF PREDATION , 2004 .

[44]  E. Odum,et al.  The Emergence of Ecology as a New Integrative Discipline , 1977, Science.

[45]  E. Ashe,et al.  Killer whale evasive tactics vary with boat number , 2007 .

[46]  Timothy C. Tricas,et al.  Effects of EMFs from Undersea Power Cables on Elasmobranchs and Other Marine Species. , 2011 .

[47]  P. Seligman,et al.  Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies. , 2003, Marine pollution bulletin.

[48]  T. Albanis,et al.  Worldwide occurrence and effects of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment: a review. , 2004, Environment international.

[49]  John K. B. Ford,et al.  Dietary specialization in two sympatric populations of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in coastal British Columbia and adjacent waters , 1998 .

[50]  Britta Eklund,et al.  Comparison of toxicity and release rates of Cu and Zn from anti-fouling paints leached in natural and artificial brackish seawater. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[51]  Rob Williams,et al.  Behavioural responses of male killer whales to a ‘leapfrogging’ vessel , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[52]  G. Ellis,et al.  Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia , 2006 .

[53]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The Habitat-Creation Potential of Offshore Wind Farms , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[54]  B. Polagye,et al.  Environmental Effects of Tidal Energy Development , 2011 .

[55]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Impacts of offshore wind farm construction on harbour porpoises: acoustic monitoring of echolocation activity using porpoise detectors (T-PODs) , 2006 .

[56]  S. Neill,et al.  The impact of tidal stream turbines on large-scale sediment dynamics , 2009 .

[57]  A. Hoelzel Foraging behaviour and social group dynamics in Puget Sound killer whales , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  K Hiscock,et al.  High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project , 2002 .

[59]  Stephen D. Unwin,et al.  Identification and Prioritization of Analysis Cases for Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Risk Screening , 2010 .

[60]  Adam Schultz,et al.  Electromagnetic Field Study , 2010 .