Modified local variance based method for selecting the optimal spatial resolution of remote sensing image

Facing with the prevalence of multi-spatial resolution satellite data sets, selecting data with appropriate resolution has become a new problem. This paper analyses the significance of scale selection of remote sensing images and discusses geostatistics based method of quantitively selecting the optimal spatial resolution of remote sensing image. Breaking through the limitation of traditional average local variance, this paper proposes the modified average local variance method based on variable window size and variable resolution to quantitatively select the optimal spatial resolution of remote sensing image. In order to verify the validity of this method, this paper gives further image classification experiments at different spatial resolution. The experimental results show that the trend of classification accuracy along with spatial resolution is consistent with that of modified average local variance, which means that the image classification accuracy of the optimal resolution image is basically higher than those of other's. Consequently, modified average local variance based method of quantitively selecting the optimal spatial resolution of remote sensing image has theoretical and instructive meaning to a certain extent.

[1]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[2]  N. Lam,et al.  Environmental analysis using integrated GIS and remotely sensed data - Some research needs and priorities , 1991 .

[3]  A. Stein,et al.  Spatial statistics for remote sensing , 2002 .

[4]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Scale and the spatial structure of landform: optimising sampling strategies with geostatistics , 1998 .

[5]  J. Townshend,et al.  Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution , 1981 .

[6]  H. Hyppänen,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and optimal spatial resolution of optical remote sensing data in boreal forest environment , 1996 .

[7]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Predicting the complexity of habitat in forests from airborne videography for wildlife management , 1997 .

[8]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[9]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[10]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[11]  P. K. Bocher,et al.  The fundamentals of average local variance - part I: detecting regular patterns , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Utilizing local variance of simulated high spatial resolution imagery to predict spatial pattern of forest stands , 2000 .

[13]  G. Hay,et al.  Remote Sensing Contributions to the Scale Issue , 1999 .

[14]  P. K. Bocher,et al.  The fundamentals of average local Variance-part II: sampling simple regular patterns with optical imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Optimizing spatial image support for quantitative mapping of natural vegetation , 2009 .