2022-RA-595-ESGO Figure 1 Abstracts Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 A171 on D ecem er 5, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .68 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom Results The cell population included large consistency of positive cells (A) which were analyzed in their vitality using the PC5-conjugated-7-AAD viability marker. Almost the full population, namely 95.7% of Ddx4 cells were found viable among a minority equal to 4.3% of dead cells (B-C), suggesting that the fragments cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen is almost indolent on the OSC viability. Conclusion The consistency of OSC population from a single cryopreserved ovarian cortex after thawing suggest that this population is apparently resistant to the temperature stress for freezing and thawing, thus reinforcing interest for stemness studies in treatment of female CTRI. 2022-VA-596-ESGO LAPAROSCOPIC VAGINAL RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY IN THE POST LACC ERA: STEP BY STEP SURGICAL PROCEDURE Benedetta Guani, Vincent Balaya, Fabrice Lecuru, Patrice Matehvet. CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland; HFR, Fribourg, Switzerland; Hopital Foch, suresnes, France; Hopital Curie, Paris, France 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.369 Introduction/Background Therapeutic management of early stage cervical cancer is mainly based on surgery. Radical trachelectomy is a strategy to preserve the fertility of young patients with cervical cancer. In the ESGO and NCCN Guidelines, Radical Trachelectomy type B is indicated in case of cervical cancer stage 1B1. The prospective CONCERV study shows the safety of the simple conisation in early-stage cervical cancer <2 cm in case of stroll invasion <10 mm and no lymph vascular space invasion.Actually the indication to the radical trachelectomy remains:-Cervical cancer <2 cm-FIGO stage not more 1B1-Negative lymph node-Positive LVSI The oncological safety of the minimally invasive approach has recently questioned by the international randomized LACC trial. This result have therefore renewed interest in the vaginal approach, associated to lymph node staging by laparoscopy. Methodology We described the indication and the procedure in a video. Results In this video we described the radical trachelectomy by the laparoscopic vaginal approach in 10 steps. Abstract 2022-VA-596-ESGO Figure 1 Conclusion This technique is a safe oncological procedure in the post-LACC era.2022-VA-596-ESGO Figure 1 Conclusion This technique is a safe oncological procedure in the post-LACC era. 2022-RA-598-ESGO PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR ADVERSE OBSTETRIC OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT CANCER PATIENTS AN UPDATE ON 2174 CASES REGISTERED IN THE INCIP REGISTRY Charlotte Maggen, Joosje Heimovaara, Kristel van Calsteren, Elyce Cardonick, Annouschka Laenen, Roman G Shmakov, Vera Wolters, Mina Mhallem Gziri, Christianne Lok, Evgeniya Polushkina, Jeroen Blommaert, Michael Halaska, Robert Fruscio, Alvaro Cabrera-Garcia, Ingrid A Boere, Ingrid A Boere, Petronella Ottevanger, Giovanna Scarfone, Jorine de Haan, Frédéric Amant. Obstetrics and perinatal medicine, UZ Brussels, Jette, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper, University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA, Camden, NJ; Statistics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation; Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, UCL, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium; Faculty Hospital Kralovske, Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan – Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy, Milan, Italy; Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca (HRAEI) ‘ Reference clinic for hemato-oncological diseases during pregnancy CREHER’ Estado de México, México, Mexico, Mexico; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Sant’Anna Hospital, via Ventimiglia 1, 10126, Turin, Italy., Turin, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Nijmegen, Netherlands; Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Milan, Italy., Milan, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Amsterdam, Netherlands 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.370 Introduction/Background Following the increasing evidence on fetal safety, over time more pregnant women are receiving cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, in order to safeguard maternal prognosis. To evaluate current clinical practice obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women registered by the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) were assessed. Abstract 2022-RA-598-ESGO Figure 1 Distribution of cancer types and cancer stages at diagnosis by cancer type (n=2174) Abstracts2022-RA-598-ESGO Figure 1 Distribution of cancer types and cancer stages at diagnosis by cancer type (n=2174) Abstracts A172 Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 on D ecem er 5, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .68 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom
[1]
J. Kocourková,et al.
Has the cesarean epidemic in Czechia been reversed despite fertility postponement?
,
2022,
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
[2]
C. Genestie,et al.
Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review.
,
2022,
Gynecologic oncology.
[3]
M. Hruda,et al.
Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Oncological outcomes.
,
2021,
Gynecologic oncology.
[4]
N. Kvarnström,et al.
Novel approaches in uterus transplantation
,
2020,
Current opinion in organ transplantation.
[5]
M. Plante,et al.
Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?
,
2020,
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.
[6]
F. Nezhat,et al.
Reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.
,
2020,
Fertility and sterility.
[7]
Jacques Ferlay,et al.
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis
,
2019,
The Lancet. Global health.
[8]
M. Madeleine,et al.
Gynecologic cancers and solid organ transplantation
,
2019,
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
[9]
Lin Sun,et al.
Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
,
2019,
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.
[10]
F. Landoni,et al.
Conization in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: Pattern of Recurrence in a 10-Year Single-Institution Experience
,
2017,
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[11]
Cyrus Chargari,et al.
Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
,
2016,
Fertility and sterility.
[12]
L. Dušek,et al.
Results of less radical fertility-sparing procedures with omitted parametrectomy for cervical cancer: 5years of experience.
,
2016,
Gynecologic oncology.
[13]
Marc Arbyn,et al.
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis
,
2016,
British Medical Journal.
[14]
P. Ramirez,et al.
Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy - a systematic literature review.
,
2013,
Gynecologic oncology.
[15]
M. Plante.
Evolution in Fertility-Preserving Options for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Radical Trachelectomy, Simple Trachelectomy, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
,
2013,
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[16]
L. Rob,et al.
Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer.
,
2011,
The Lancet. Oncology.
[17]
L. Gien,et al.
Fertility-sparing options for early stage cervical cancer.
,
2010,
Gynecologic oncology.
[18]
S. Pecorelli,et al.
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix
,
2009,
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[19]
T. Raju,et al.
Optimizing Care and Outcome for Late-Preterm (Near-Term) Infants: A Summary of the Workshop Sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
,
2006,
Pediatrics.
[20]
L. Rob,et al.
Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer
,
2006,
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[21]
M. Bernardini,et al.
Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomy.
,
2003,
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[22]
P. Mathevet,et al.
La préservation de la fertilité dans les cancers du col utérin de stade précoce
,
2003
.