Strategy of Transcription Regulation in the Budding Yeast

Cells must adjust their gene expression in order to compete in a constantly changing environment. Two alternative strategies could in principle ensure optimal coordination of gene expression with physiological requirements. First, characters of the internal physiological state, such as growth rate, metabolite levels, or energy availability, could be feedback to tune gene expression. Second, internal needs could be inferred from the external environment, using evolutionary-tuned signaling pathways. Coordination of ribosomal biogenesis with the requirement for protein synthesis is of particular importance, since cells devote a large fraction of their biosynthetic capacity for ribosomal biogenesis. To define the relative contribution of internal vs. external sensing to the regulation of ribosomal biogenesis gene expression in yeast, we subjected S. cerevisiae cells to conditions which decoupled the actual vs. environmentally-expected growth rate. Gene expression followed the environmental signal according to the expected, but not the actual, growth rate. Simultaneous monitoring of gene expression and growth rate in continuous cultures further confirmed that ribosome biogenesis genes responded rapidly to changes in the environments but were oblivious to longer-term changes in growth rate. Our results suggest that the capacity to anticipate and prepare for environmentally-mediated changes in cell growth presented a major selection force during yeast evolution.

[1]  Lee A. Segel,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Phenomena in Molecular and Cellular Biology , 1984 .

[2]  Tom Moss,et al.  At the crossroads of growth control; making ribosomal RNA. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[3]  C. Turnbough,et al.  Transcription regulation by initiating NTP concentration: rRNA synthesis in bacteria. , 1997, Science.

[4]  M. Tyers,et al.  A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. , 2004, Genes & development.

[5]  R. Gourse,et al.  Control of rRNA expression by small molecules is dynamic and nonredundant. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[6]  D. Chatterji,et al.  Revisiting the stringent response, ppGpp and starvation signaling. , 2001, Current opinion in microbiology.

[7]  K. A. Walker,et al.  The Escherichia coli fis Promoter Is Regulated by Changes in the Levels of Its Transcription Initiation Nucleotide CTP* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Iterative signature algorithm for the analysis of large-scale gene expression data. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Xiao-Jun Li,et al.  Overexpression of ribosomal protein L15 is associated with cell proliferation in gastric cancer , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[10]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  J. Warner,et al.  The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[12]  M. Hall,et al.  TOR Regulates Ribosomal Protein Gene Expression via PKA and the Forkhead Transcription Factor FHL1 , 2004, Cell.

[13]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Rewiring of the Yeast Transcriptional Network Through the Evolution of Motif Usage , 2005, Science.

[14]  M. Cárdenas,et al.  Tor and Cyclic AMP-Protein Kinase A: Two Parallel Pathways Regulating Expression of Genes Required for Cell Growth , 2005, Eukaryotic Cell.

[15]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[16]  Ole Winther,et al.  Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genome Biology.

[17]  Yaniv Ziv,et al.  Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  David Botstein,et al.  Nutritional homeostasis in batch and steady-state culture of yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Does the ribosome translate cancer? , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  David Tollervey,et al.  Making ribosomes. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  Hongyue Dai,et al.  Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[23]  R. Gourse,et al.  NTP-sensing by rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli is direct , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  Dissection of the mechanism for the stringent factor RelA. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[25]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Systematic Identification of Pathways That Couple Cell Growth and Division in Yeast , 2002, Science.

[26]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Defining transcription modules using large-scale gene expression data , 2004, Bioinform..

[27]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Dipankar Chatterji,et al.  ppGpp: stringent response and survival. , 2006, Journal of microbiology.

[29]  R. Gourse,et al.  rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[30]  T. Powers,et al.  Regulation of ribosome biogenesis by the rapamycin-sensitive TOR-signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  R. Gourse,et al.  rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Annual Review of Microbiology.