Generalization of Object Manipulation Skills Learned without Limb Motion

Recent work suggests that human subjects may learn mappings between object motion and exerted torque during manipulation of freely pivoting or unstable objects. In the present work, we studied an object manipulation task involving no arm movement to determine how subjects internally represent the force—motion relationship of an object during a skilled manipulation task. Human subjects learned to balance a simulated inverted pendulum. The simulation was controlled by pressing on a fixed force sensor, and applied forces resulted in motion of the simulated pendulum on a computer screen according to its equation of motion. Each subject initially learned the task in one arm posture and was tested 1 d later in a new arm posture. In one test condition, the effects of arm torque were matched to the original task, and in the other test condition, the simulation was unchanged. The pattern of skill transfer to different arm postures suggested that subjects had learned joint torque responses rather than a general model of the object interface forces. A second experiment showed that the advantage of training with matched arm torques was object specific, because torque-matched training on a tracking task involving similar forces was not a substitute for training in the balancing task.

[1]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  K. Doya Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Neuronlike adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control problems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  W. T. Thach A Role for the Cerebellum in Learning Movement Coordination , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[6]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Computational approaches to motor control , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[9]  D. B. Preston Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The Inertial Anisotropy of the Arm Is Accurately Predicted during Movement Planning , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Why can't you tickle yourself? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[13]  M. Kawato,et al.  Temporal firing patterns of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar ventral paraflocculus during ocular following responses in monkeys II. Complex spikes. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Kawato,et al.  Inverse-dynamics model eye movement control by Purkinje cells in the cerebellum , 1993, Nature.

[15]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  H. J. Wyatt,et al.  Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: Effects of target presence and subject attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  S. Hah,et al.  The relative dominance of schemata in a manual tracking task: input patterns, system dynamics, and movement patterns. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action , 1999, Neuroreport.

[20]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[21]  R. Miall,et al.  Manual tracking of visual targets by trained monkeys , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  A Model of the Effects of Speed, Accuracy, and Perturbation on Visually Guided Reaching , 1992 .

[23]  David J Ostry,et al.  Transfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion–force relationships during object manipulation , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[26]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  R. Miall,et al.  Task-dependent changes in visual feedback control: a frequency analysis of human manual tracking. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Ebner A role for the cerebellum in the control of limb movement velocity , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  D J Ostry,et al.  Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  R. C. Miall,et al.  Motor control, biological and theoretical , 1998 .

[32]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[35]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[38]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[39]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[41]  James C. Houk,et al.  A Cerebellar Model of Timing and Prediction in the Control of Reaching , 1999, Neural Computation.

[42]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Forward models in visuomotor control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  M. Kawato,et al.  Temporal firing patterns of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar ventral paraflocculus during ocular following responses in monkeys I. Simple spikes. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.