Quantitative estimation of bioturbation based on digital image analysis

Quantitative determination of modification of primary sediment features, by the activity of organisms (i.e., bioturbation) is essential in geosciences. Some methods proposed since the 1960s are mainly based on visual or subjective determinations. The first semiquantitative evaluations of the Bioturbation Index, Ichnofabric Index, or the amount of bioturbation were attempted, in the best cases using a series of flashcards designed in different situations. Recently, more effective methods involve the use of analytical and computational methods such as X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography; these methods are complex and often expensive. This paper presents a compilation of different methods, using Adobe® Photoshop® software CS6, for digital estimation that are a part of the IDIAP (Ichnological Digital Analysis Images Package), which is an inexpensive alternative to recently proposed methods, easy to use, and especially recommended for core samples. The different methods — “Similar Pixel Selection Method (SPSM)”, “Magic Wand Method (MWM)” and the “Color Range Selection Method (CRSM)” — entail advantages and disadvantages depending on the sediment (e.g., composition, color, texture, porosity, etc.) and ichnological features (size of traces, infilling material, burrow wall, etc.). The IDIAP provides an estimation of the amount of trace fossils produced by a particular ichnotaxon, by a whole ichnocoenosis or even for a complete ichnofabric. We recommend the application of the complete IDIAP to a given case study, followed by selection of the most appropriate method. The IDIAP was applied to core material recovered from the IODP Expedition 339, enabling us, for the first time, to arrive at a quantitative estimation of the discrete trace fossil assemblage in core samples.

[1]  Thomas G. Heard,et al.  Trace fossils as diagnostic indicators of deep‐marine environments, Middle Eocene Ainsa‐Jaca basin, Spanish Pyrenees , 2007 .

[2]  C. Mendoza,et al.  Porosity and Permeability in Bioturbated Sediments , 2012 .

[3]  J. K. Kim,et al.  IODP Expedition 339 in the Gulf of Cadiz and off West Iberia : decoding the environmental significance of the Mediterranean outflow water and its global influence , 2013 .

[4]  J. Brossmann,et al.  Computed tomography: application in studying biogenic structures in sediment cores , 1994 .

[5]  P. Francus Quantification of Bioturbation in Hemipelagic Sediments Via Thin-Section Image Analysis: RESEARCH METHODS PAPERS , 2001 .

[6]  C. E. Honeycutt,et al.  Image analysis techniques and gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) for calculating bioturbation indices and characterizing biogenic sedimentary structures , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  Djebbar Tiab,et al.  Porosity and Permeability , 2004 .

[8]  D. Bottjer,et al.  THE INTERSECTION GRID TECHNIQUE FOR QUANTIFYING THE EXTENT OF BIOTURBATION ON BEDDING PLANES , 2010 .

[9]  P. Archambault,et al.  A new method for three‐dimensional visualization and quantification of biogenic structures in aquatic sediments using axial tomodensitometry , 2005 .

[10]  R. Bromley,et al.  Trace fossils as indicators of sedimentary environments , 2012 .

[11]  B. Balcom,et al.  Visualizing the Internal Physical Characteristics of Carbonate Sediments with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Petrography , 2002 .

[12]  Mary L. Droser,et al.  A semiquantitative field classification of ichnofabric , 1986 .

[13]  A. A. Ekdale,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of visually complex ichnofabrics in deep-sea sediments , 1994 .

[14]  A Method for Estimation of Free Mica Particles in Aggregate Fine Fraction by Image Analysis of Grain Mounts , 2008 .

[15]  D. Bottjer,et al.  Quantifying Bioturbation in Ediacaran and Cambrian Rocks , 2011 .

[16]  D. Knaust Methodology and Techniques , 2012 .

[17]  H. Reineck Sedimentgefüge im Bereich der südlichen Nordsee , 1963 .

[18]  J. Dorador,et al.  Digital image treatment applied to ichnological analysis of marine core sediments , 2013, Facies.

[19]  G. Acton,et al.  The "Shackleton Site" (IODP Site U1385) on the Iberian Margin , 2013 .

[20]  D. Bottjer,et al.  The importance of Planolites in the Cambrian substrate revolution , 2008 .

[21]  Rute Coimbra,et al.  Pixel counting for percentage estimation: Applications to sedimentary petrology , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[22]  P. Francus Quantification of bioturbation in hemipelagic sediments via thin-section image analysis , 2001 .

[23]  M. F. Miller,et al.  A semiquantitative field method for evaluating bioturbation on bedding planes , 1997 .

[24]  R. E. Hill,et al.  Using automated digital image analysis to provide quantitative petrographic data on olivine-phyric basalts , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  L. Löwemark Automatic image analysis of X-ray radiographs: a new method for ichnofabric evaluation , 2003 .

[26]  R. Goldring,et al.  Description and analysis of bioturbation and ichnofabric , 1993, Journal of the Geological Society.

[27]  R. Bromley,et al.  The Ichnofabric Concept , 2012 .