Reduced-Order Modeling of a High-Fidelity Propulsion System Simulation

Ever stringent aircraft design requirements on simultaneous reduction in fuel consumption, emissions, and noise necessitate innovative, integrated airframe designs that require concurrent engine designs. In order to ful ll these design challenges, aerospace engineers have relied on a physics-based engine modeling environment such as the numerical propulsion system simulation (NPSS). To expedite the use of NPSS in aircraft design, this research proposes a methodology for the reduced-order modeling (ROM) of NPSS by incorporating the following two techniques: probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) for basis extraction and neural networks for weighting coe cient prediction. To e ciently achieve an empirical orthogonal basis, this research capitalizes on an EM algorithm for PPCA (EM-PCA) to handle NPSS engine decks that typically lack some data due to failed o -design performance analyses. In addition, to e ectively explore a weighting coe cient space, this research utilizes neural networks to deal with six NPSS engine modeling parameters. As a proof of concept, the proposed NPSS ROM method is applied to an NPSS turbofan engine model usually employed for conventional civil transport aircraft. Comprehensive prediction quality investigations reveal that engine performance metrics estimated by the reduced-order NPSS model show considerably good agreement with those directly obtained by NPSS. Furthermore, the reduced NPSS engine model is integrated with the ight optimization system (FLOPS) in lieu of directly using NPSS as an illustration of the utility of NPSS ROM for aircraft design research.

[1]  Scott M. Jones Steady-State Modeling of Gas Turbine Engines Using the Numerical Propulsion System Simulation Code , 2010 .

[2]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Unifying Perspective for Gappy Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Kyunghoon Lee,et al.  Investigation of probabilistic principal component analysis compared to proper orthogonal decomposition methods for basis extraction and missing data estimation , 2010 .

[4]  Tao Chen,et al.  Robust probabilistic PCA with missing data and contribution analysis for outlier detection , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[5]  Gregg G. Fleming,et al.  Modeling of Terminal-Area Airplane Fuel Consumption , 2009 .

[6]  D. MacManus,et al.  A high‐fidelity low‐cost aerodynamic model using proper orthogonal decomposition , 2009 .

[7]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Aerodynamic Data Reconstruction via Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  An application of Gappy POD , 2006 .

[9]  M. Schobeiri Turbomachinery Flow Physics and Dynamic Performance , 2004 .

[10]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2003, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[11]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition extensions for parametric applications in compressible aerodynamics , 2003 .

[12]  Joseph P. Veres,et al.  Overview of High-Fidelity Modeling Activities in the Numerical Propulsion System Simulations (NPSS) Project , 2002 .

[13]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A probabilistic approach for examining aircraft concept feasibility and viability , 2000 .

[14]  Gregory Follen,et al.  Numerical Zooming Between a NPSS Engine System Simulation and a One-Dimensional High Compressor Analysis Code , 2000 .

[15]  John K. Lytle,et al.  The Numerical Propulsion System Simulation: An Overview , 2000 .

[16]  Lfp Pascal Etman,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[17]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Karhunen–Loève procedure for gappy data , 1995 .

[18]  Thomas M. Lavelle,et al.  Concurrent optimization of airframe and engine design parameters , 1992 .

[19]  P. Alfeld Scattered data interpolation in three or more variables , 1989 .

[20]  Dorothy T. Thayer,et al.  EM algorithms for ML factor analysis , 1982 .

[21]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[22]  Donald M. Baer,et al.  A Component Analysis , 1977 .

[23]  Tim Yoder,et al.  Development of aircraft fuel burn modeling techniques with applications to global emissions modeling and assessment of the benefits of reduced vertical separation minimums , 2007 .

[24]  M.N.S. Swamy,et al.  Neural networks in a softcomputing framework , 2006 .

[25]  K. Willcox,et al.  Aerodynamic Data Reconstruction and Inverse Design Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004 .

[26]  Bui Thanh Tan,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Extensions and Their Applications in Steady Aerodynamics , 2003 .

[27]  David J. Lucia,et al.  Domain Decomposition for Reduced-Order Modeling of a Flow with Moving Shocks , 2002 .

[28]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[29]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Robust Design Simulation: A Probabilistic Approach to Multidisciplinary Design , 1999 .

[30]  Chao Yang,et al.  ARPACK users' guide - solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods , 1998, Software, environments, tools.

[31]  L Sirovich,et al.  The Karhunen-lo Eve Procedure for Gappy Data , 1995 .

[32]  Jack D. Mattingly,et al.  Aircraft engine design , 1987 .

[33]  Kolumban Hutter,et al.  The Method of Weighted Residuals , 1987 .