Developments in Container Port Competition in East Asia

Abstract The ports of Hong Kong, Busan and Kaohsiung have long dominated container handling in East Asia. However, the emergence of new transhipment and gateway hub candidates, which include Shanghai, Shenzhen, Kwangyang and Qingdao, among others, will vie with these incumbents for a greater share of container traffic. Some might even unseat the incumbents. This study finds, through evidences from container shipping services connecting the region to major markets and trade routes between 1995 and 2001, that Mainland Chinese ports are increasingly attractive as direct ports of call for mainline services. The evidence also suggests that new services started by mainline operators calling at Mainland China are bypassing Japanese and Taiwanese ports. Nonetheless, these services continue to call at Hong Kong. Although the composition of containers handled at Mainland Chinese ports consists largely of gateway cargo, these ports are expected to handle a rising share of transhipment traffic.

[1]  H. Meersman,et al.  Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis of the factors determining the competitiveness of seaports , 2002 .

[2]  Peter Rousseeuw,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Seaports , 2000 .

[3]  E. Frankel The Economics of Total Trans-ocean Supply Chain Management , 1999 .

[4]  Claude Comtois,et al.  Shipping lines as agents of change in the port industry , 1996 .

[5]  Sidney Gilman,et al.  The Size Economies and Network Efficiency of Large Containerships , 1999 .

[6]  R. Midoro,et al.  A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping , 2000 .

[7]  Douglas K. Fleming WORLD CONTAINER PORT RANKINGS , 1997 .

[8]  B. Slack CONTAINERIZATION, INTER-PORT COMPETITION, AND PORT SELECTION , 1985 .

[9]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  How to operationalize porter's diamond of international competitiveness , 1993 .

[10]  Roger R. Stough,et al.  (New York: Vintage) pp. 45--55 , 1997 .

[11]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The Administrative and Ownership Structure of Asian Container Ports , 2001 .

[12]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection , 2001 .

[13]  H. Meersman,et al.  Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition? , 2000 .

[14]  H. Meersman,et al.  Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports , 2001 .

[15]  H. Arjen van Klink,et al.  Gateways and intermodalism , 1998 .

[16]  Eddy Van de Voorde,et al.  A general introduction to port competition and management , 2002 .

[17]  J. Lam,et al.  An interpretation of inter-container port relationships from the demand perspective , 2004 .

[18]  William G. Shepherd,et al.  The economics of industrial organization , 1979 .

[19]  E. J. Sheppard,et al.  Ocean Shipping Alliances: The Wave of the Future? , 2001 .

[20]  R. Robinson Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[21]  H. J. Peters,et al.  Developments in Global Seatrade and Container Shipping Markets: Their Effects on the Port Industry and Private Sector Involvement , 2001 .

[22]  E. Frankel China' maritime developments , 1998 .

[23]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[24]  Roger R. Stough,et al.  REGIONAL PORT DYNAMICS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: THE CASE OF KAOHSIUNG, TAIWAN , 1997 .

[25]  Charles P. Kindleberger,et al.  International trade statistics , 1954 .

[26]  Ross Robinson,et al.  Asian hub/feeder nets: the dynamics of restructuring , 1998 .