Social Comparison in Behavior Change Support Systems: Heuristic Evaluation of a System's Usability

People’s willingness for sharing personal data with others allows designers to consider utilizing social comparison functions into behavior change support systems. Behavior change applications, which enable social comparison, seem to be gaining popularity nowadays. Usability flaws may diminish the usage and engagement of behavior change support systems, therefore attention was paid to usability issues in this particular case. Following usability guidelines early enough in the design may save time and resources.

[1]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques? , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[2]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[3]  J. Prochaska,et al.  The Transtheoretical Approach , 2019, Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration.

[4]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[5]  D. Conroy,et al.  Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  A Persuasive and Social mHealth Application for Physical Activity: A Usability and Feasibility Study , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[8]  Sangaralingam Kajanan,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Smartphone Fitness Apps , 2013, PACIS.

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[10]  M. Morris,et al.  Mobile, Social, and Wearable Computing and the Evolution of Psychological Practice. , 2012, Professional psychology, research and practice.

[11]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation , 2008, ECIS.