Real-time processing algorithms for target detection and classification in hyperspectral imagery

The authors present a linearly constrained minimum variance (TCMV) beamforming approach to real time processing algorithms for target detection and classification in hyperspectral imagery. The only required knowledge for these LCMV-based algorithms is targets of interest. The idea is to design a finite impulse response (FIR) filter to pass through these targets using a set of linear constraints while also minimizing the variance resulting from unknown signal sources. Two particular LCMV-based target detectors, the constrained energy minimization (CEM) and the target-constrained interference-minimization filter (TCIMF), are presented. In order to expand the ability of the LCMV-based target detectors to classification, the LCMV approach is further generalized so that the targets can be detected and classified simultaneously. By taking advantage of the LCMV-based filter structure, the LCMV-based target detectors and classifiers can be implemented by a QR-decomposition and be processed line-by-line in real time. The experiments using HYDICE and AVIRIS data are conducted to demonstrate their real time implementation.

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Target-constrained interference-minimized approach to subpixel target detection for hyperspectral images , 2000 .

[2]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A target-constrained interference-minimized filter for subpixel target detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[3]  O. L. Frost,et al.  An algorithm for linearly constrained adaptive array processing , 1972 .

[4]  J. G. McWhirter,et al.  A novel algorithm and architecture for adaptive digital beamforming , 1986 .

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[6]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[7]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An experiment-based quantitative and comparative analysis of target detection and image classification algorithms for hyperspectral imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Jeff J. Settle,et al.  On the relationship between spectral unmixing and subspace projection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Mark L. G. Althouse,et al.  Least squares subspace projection approach to mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[11]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[12]  Alan D. Stocker,et al.  Real-time hyperspectral detection and cuing , 2000 .

[13]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[15]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[16]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Further results on relationship between spectral unmixing and subspace projection , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..