Functional imaging and language: A critical guide to methodology and analysis

This paper summarizes the methodology involved in functional neuroimaging, both experimental designs and data analyses. It is intended as a general introduction to the techniques and terminology involved, and aimed at speech scientists new to the area. The methods covered are positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Other imaging methods, reliant on the pattern of electrical discharges associated with neural activity, have also been used clinically and experimentally, and provide excellent temporal resolution but poor spatial resolution. It is not within the scope of this review to address these. The emphasis is on potential criticisms and problems concerning PET and fMRI, since much has already been published about the advantages, real or perceived. The strengths and weaknesses of PET and fMRI are addressed, with reference to language studies.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Brain systems for word perception and articulation. , 1999 .

[5]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J Ashburner,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in six normal and two aphasic subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[8]  S. Ogawa Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation , 1990 .

[9]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[11]  D. Poeppel A Critical Review of PET Studies of Phonological Processing , 1996, Brain and Language.

[12]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[13]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[14]  C Büchel,et al.  Brain regions involved in articulation , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  A. B.,et al.  SPEECH COMMUNICATION , 2001 .

[16]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  Explicit and Incidental Facial Expression Processing: An fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  B. Postle,et al.  Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. , 2000, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[20]  J H McColl,et al.  Statistical methods in neuroimaging with particular application to emission tomography , 1994, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  S. Catrin Blank,et al.  Neural systems involved in propositional and non-propositional speech , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus‐correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[24]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[28]  E Borg,et al.  MRI acoustic noise: Sound pressure and frequency analysis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[30]  B. Rosen,et al.  Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: Contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction , 1996, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  N. Dronkers A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation , 1996, Nature.

[35]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Imaging subcortical auditory activity in humans , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[36]  E. Maguire,et al.  Differential modulation of a common memory retrieval network revealed by positron emission tomography , 1999, Hippocampus.

[37]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[39]  D. Witoński,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Clinics in sports medicine.

[40]  E Borg,et al.  Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system. , 2000, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[41]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  P A Bandettini,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  S. Scott,et al.  Noun imageability and the temporal lobes , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[46]  Philip K. McGuire,et al.  Lexical retrieval during fluent speech production: an fMRI study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[47]  A P Leff,et al.  Impaired reading in patients with right hemianopia , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[48]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo‐planar time course MRI of cat brain oxygenation changes , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  R G Shulman,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the human brain auditory cortex response to increasing word presentation rates. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  C. Price,et al.  Three Distinct Ventral Occipitotemporal Regions for Reading and Object Naming , 1999, NeuroImage.

[51]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[52]  M J Brammer,et al.  The analysis of functional magnetic resonance images , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A thalamo‐prefrontal system for representation in executive response choice , 2000, Neuroreport.