Magnitude, spatial distribution and uncertainty of forest biomass stocks in Mexico

Abstract Existing forest biomass stock maps show discrepancies with in-situ observations in Mexico. Ground data from the National Forest and Soil Inventory of Mexico (INFyS) were used to calibrate a maximum entropy (MaxEnt) algorithm to generate forest biomass ( AGB ), its associated uncertainty, and forest probability maps. The input predictor layers for the MaxEnt algorithm were extracted from the moderate resolution imaging spectrometer (MODIS) vegetation index (VI) products, ALOS PALSAR L-band dual-polarization backscatter coefficient images, and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model. A Jackknife analysis of the model accuracy indicated that the ALOS PALSAR layers have the highest relative contribution (50.9%) to the estimation of AGB , followed by MODIS-VI (32.9%) and SRTM (16.2%). The forest cover mask derived from the forest probability map showed higher accuracy ( κ  = 0.83) than alternative masks derived from ALOS PALSAR ( κ  = 0.72–0.78) or MODIS vegetation continuous fields (VCF) with a 10% tree cover threshold ( κ  = 0.66). The use of different forest cover masks yielded differences of about 30 million ha in forest cover extent and 0.45 Gt C in total carbon stocks. The AGB map showed a root mean square error (RMSE) of 17.3 t C ha − 1 and R 2  = 0.31 when validated at the 250 m pixel scale with inventory plots. The error and accuracy at municipality and state levels were RMSE = ± 4.4 t C ha − 1 , R 2  = 0.75 and RMSE = ± 2.1 t C ha − 1 , R 2  = 0.94 respectively. We estimate the total carbon stored in the aboveground live biomass of forests of Mexico to be 1.69 Gt C ± 1% (mean carbon density of 21.8 t C ha − 1 ), which agrees with the total carbon estimated by FAO for the FRA 2010 (1.68 Gt C). The new map, derived directly from the biomass estimates of the national inventory, proved to have similar accuracy as existing forest biomass maps of Mexico, but is more representative of the shape of the probability distribution function of AGB in the national forest inventory data. Our results suggest that the use of a non-parametric maximum entropy model trained with forest inventory plots, even at the sub-pixel size, can provide accurate spatial maps for national or regional REDD + applications and MRV systems.

[1]  Balkan Region,et al.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 - Report on fires in the , 2006 .

[2]  R. Lucas,et al.  New global forest/non-forest maps from ALOS PALSAR data (2007–2010) , 2014 .

[3]  Leveraging the Landscape , 2012 .

[4]  A. Jarvis.  Hole-field seamless SRTM data, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) , 2008 .

[5]  Francis Canisius,et al.  ALOS PALSAR L-band polarimetric SAR data and in situ measurements for leaf area index assessment , 2012 .

[6]  Erik Næsset,et al.  The uncertainty of biomass estimates from LiDAR and SAR across a boreal forest structure gradient , 2014 .

[7]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[8]  Oleg Antropov,et al.  Improved Mapping of Tropical Forests With Optical and SAR Imagery, Part I: Forest Cover and Accuracy Assessment Using Multi-Resolution Data , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  Retrieval of growing stock volume in boreal forest using hyper-temporal series of Envisat ASAR ScanSAR backscatter measurements , 2011 .

[10]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  JERS-1 SAR mosaics of Southeast Asia using calibrated path images , 2002 .

[11]  T. Dawson,et al.  SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species , 2002 .

[12]  A. Baccini,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda , 2012 .

[13]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Biomass, Carbon, and Nitrogen Pools in Mexican Tropical Dry Forest Landscapes , 2003, Ecosystems.

[14]  Miroslav Dudík,et al.  A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling , 2004, ICML.

[15]  T. Dawson,et al.  Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data , 2004 .

[16]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[17]  Richard Condit,et al.  Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm , 2003 .

[19]  S. Goetz,et al.  Reply to Comment on ‘A first map of tropical Africa’s above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery’ , 2008, Environmental Research Letters.

[20]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  MODIS tree cover validation for the circumpolar taiga-tundra transition zone , 2009 .

[21]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[22]  Oliver Cartus,et al.  A National, Detailed Map of Forest Aboveground Carbon Stocks in Mexico , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[23]  I. Woodhouse,et al.  Using satellite radar backscatter to predict above‐ground woody biomass: A consistent relationship across four different African landscapes , 2009 .

[24]  Wenkai Li,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Remote Sensing a Maximum Entropy Approach to One-class Classification of Remote Sensing Imagery a Maximum Entropy Approach to One-class Classification of Remote Sensing Imagery , 2022 .

[25]  S. Goetz,et al.  Uncertainty in the spatial distribution of tropical forest biomass: a comparison of pan-tropical maps , 2013, Carbon Balance and Management.

[26]  F. Rocca,et al.  The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2011 .

[27]  C. Schmullius,et al.  Carbon stock and density of northern boreal and temperate forests , 2014 .

[28]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  Relating Radar Remote Sensing of Biomass to Modelling of Forest Carbon Budgets , 2004 .

[29]  John M. Kovacs,et al.  Applications of ALOS PALSAR for monitoring biophysical parameters of a degraded black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) forest , 2013 .

[30]  D. Roy,et al.  Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States , 2010 .

[31]  Katarzyna Dabrowska-Zielinska,et al.  Monitoring Wetlands Ecosystems Using ALOS PALSAR (L-Band, HV) Supplemented by Optical Data: A Case Study of Biebrza Wetlands in Northeast Poland , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[32]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[33]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Christiane Schmullius,et al.  Large-scale mapping of boreal forest in Siberia , 2003 .

[35]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Modelling and predicting fungal distribution patterns using herbarium data , 2008 .

[36]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[37]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama , 2003 .

[38]  Harris David,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2013 .

[39]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites , 2014, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[40]  D. A. King,et al.  Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees , 2010 .

[41]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[42]  A. Bloom,et al.  Are Inventory Based and Remotely Sensed Above-Ground Biomass Estimates Consistent? , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Tomohiro Shiraishi,et al.  Generation of 10m resolution PALSAR and JERS-SAR mosaic and forest/non-forest maps for forest carbon tracking , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[44]  P. Cury,et al.  The Use of a Predictive Habitat Model and a Fuzzy Logic Approach for Marine Management and Planning , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[46]  Gretchen G. Moisen,et al.  A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and Kappa , 2008 .

[47]  Oleg Antropov,et al.  Improved Mapping of Tropical Forests With Optical and SAR Imagery, Part II: Above Ground Biomass Estimation , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[48]  I. Woodhouse,et al.  Measuring biomass changes due to woody encroachment and deforestation/degradation in a forest-savanna boundary region of central Africa using multi-temporal L-band radar backscatter , 2011 .

[49]  國合會系統管理者.  Global Forest Resources Assessment , 2016 .

[50]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[51]  T. Dawson,et al.  Synthesis of remote sensing approaches for forest carbon estimation: reporting to the Kyoto Protocol , 2005 .

[52]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[53]  G. Asner,et al.  High-resolution mapping of forest carbon stocks in the Colombian Amazon , 2012 .

[54]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Conservation policy and the measurement of forests , 2016 .

[55]  João Manuel de Brito Carreiras,et al.  Estimating the Above-Ground Biomass in Miombo Savanna Woodlands (Mozambique, East Africa) Using L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[56]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[57]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[58]  S. Saatchi,et al.  Impact of spatial variability of tropical forest structure on radar estimation of aboveground biomass , 2011 .

[59]  Christian Thiel,et al.  Operational Large-Area Forest Monitoring in Siberia Using ALOS PALSAR Summer Intensities and Winter Coherence , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[60]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[61]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[62]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[63]  M. Lefsky.  A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[64]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  An environmental assessment of land cover and land use change in Central Siberia using quantified conceptual overlaps to reconcile inconsistent data sets , 2008 .

[65]  S. Goetz,et al.  Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle , 2009 .