Classification of Earth Terrain Using Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images

Supervised and unsupervised classification procedures are developed and applied to synthetic aperture radar (SAR) polarimetric images in order to identify their various Earth terrain components. For supervised classification processing, the Bayes technique is used to classify fully polarimetric and normalized polarimetric SAR data. Simpler polarimetric discriminates, such as the absolute and normalized magnitude response of the individual receiver channel returns, in addition to the phase difference between the receiver channels, are also considered. Another processing algorithm, based on comparing general properties of the Stokes parameters of the scattered wave to that of simple scattering models, is also discussed. This algorithm, which is an unsupervised technique, classifies terrain elements based on the relationship between the orientation angle and handedness of the transmitting and receiving polarization states. These classification procedures have been applied to San Francisco Bay and Traverse City SAR images, supplied by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. It is shown that supervised classification yields the best overall performance when accurate classifier training data are used, whereas unsupervised classification is applicable when training data are not available.

[1]  H. Zebker,et al.  Imaging radar polarimetry from wave synthesis , 1986 .

[2]  H. Zebker,et al.  Imaging radar polarization signatures: Theory and observation , 1987 .

[3]  S. Rice Reflection of electromagnetic waves from slightly rough surfaces , 1951 .

[4]  L. Novak,et al.  Bayes classification of terrain cover using normalized polarimetric data , 1988 .

[5]  T. W. Thompson A user's manual for the NASA/JPL synthetic aperture radar and the NASA/JPL L and C band scatterometers , 1983 .

[6]  John Richards,et al.  L-Band Radar Backscatter Modeling of Forest Stands , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  J. Zyl,et al.  Unsupervised classification of scattering behavior using radar polarimetry data , 1989 .

[8]  F. J. Kriegler,et al.  Preprocessing Transformations and Their Effects on Multispectral Recognition , 1969 .

[9]  M. M. Spencer,et al.  Preprocessing of multispectral data and simulation of ERTS data channels to make computer terrain maps of a Yellowstone National Park test site , 1970 .

[10]  Robert E Stovall A Gaussian Noise Analysis of the 'Pseudo-Coherent Discriminant , 1978 .

[11]  H. Allen Ecker,et al.  Statistical Characteristics ics of the Polarization Power Ratio for Radar Return with Circular Polarization , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  S. Sader,et al.  Multipolarization SAR Data for Surface Feature Delineation and Forest Vegetation Characterization , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Tom Farr,et al.  Multipolarization Radar Images for Geologic Mapping and Vegetation Discrimination , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[15]  Fawwaz Ulaby,et al.  Relating Polaization Phase Difference of SAR Signals to Scene Properties , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.