Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality

The aim of this paper is to attract the attention of experimenters to the original Bell (OB) inequality that was shadowed by the common consideration of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality. There are two reasons to test the OB inequality and not the CHSH inequality. First of all, the OB inequality is a straightforward consequence to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) argumentation. In addition, only this inequality is directly related to the EPR–Bohr debate. The second distinguishing feature of the OB inequality was emphasized by Itamar Pitowsky. He pointed out that the OB inequality provides a higher degree of violations of classicality than the CHSH inequality. For the CHSH inequality, the fraction of the quantum (Tsirelson) bound QCHSH=22 to the classical bound CCHSH=2, i.e., FCHSH=QCHSHCCHSH=2 is less than the fraction of the quantum bound for the OB inequality QOB=32 to the classical bound COB=1, i.e., FOB=QOBCOB=32. Thus, by violating the OB inequality, it is possible to approach a higher degree of deviation from classicality. The main problem is that the OB inequality is derived under the assumption of perfect (anti-) correlations. However, the last few years have been characterized by the amazing development of quantum technologies. Nowadays, there exist sources producing, with very high probability, the pairs of photons in the singlet state. Moreover, the efficiency of photon detectors was improved tremendously. In any event, one can start by proceeding with the fair sampling assumption. Another possibility is to use the scheme of the Hensen et al. experiment for entangled electrons. Here, the detection efficiency is very high.

[1]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[2]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality , 2014, 1412.4211.

[3]  Philippe Grangier CONTEXTUAL OBJECTIVITY AND THE QUANTUM FORMALISM , 2004 .

[4]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[5]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[6]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[7]  Kristel Michielsen,et al.  Quantum theory as a description of robust experiments: Derivation of the Pauli equation , 2015, 1504.04944.

[8]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Can Einstein with Bohr Debate on Quantum Mechanics Be Closed , 2016 .

[9]  Eberhard,et al.  Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[10]  Andrei Khrennikov Contextual viewpoint to quantum stochastics , 2003 .

[11]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[12]  Itamar Pitowsky New Bell inequalities for the singlet state: Going beyond the Grothendieck bound , 2008 .

[13]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum mechanics as the quadratic Taylor approximation of classical mechanics: The finite-dimensional case , 2005 .

[14]  Andrei Khrennikov Quantum probabilities and violation of CHSH-inequality from classical random signals and threshold type properly calibrated detectors , 2011 .

[15]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  The Probabilistic Roots of the Quantum Mechanical Paradoxes , 1984 .

[16]  Antony Valentini,et al.  Beyond the Quantum , 2009, 1001.2758.

[17]  Carlos Palazuelos,et al.  Superactivation of quantum nonlocality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[18]  M. Horne,et al.  Experimental Consequences of Objective Local Theories , 1974 .

[19]  Marian Kupczynski Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality , 2014 .

[20]  R. N. Schouten,et al.  Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km , 2015, 1508.05949.

[21]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Epistemic and Ontic Quantum Realities , 2003 .

[22]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[23]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  After Bell , 2016, 1603.08674.

[24]  M. Born,et al.  Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. , 1955, Science.

[25]  L. E. Ballentine Interpretations of Probability and Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[26]  Luiz Carlos Ryff,et al.  Bell and Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger theorems revisited , 1997 .

[27]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[28]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  A perturbation of CHSH inequality induced by fluctuations of ensemble distributions , 2000 .

[29]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bell argument: Locality or realism? Time to make the choice , 2011, 1108.0001.

[30]  A. Einstein,et al.  The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from the Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta , 1938 .

[31]  W. D. Muynck Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach , 2002 .

[32]  Louis de Broglie,et al.  The current interpretation of wave mechanics : a critical study , 1964 .

[33]  Christopher A. Fuchs Delirium Quantum Or, where I will take quantum mechanics if it will let me , 2007 .

[34]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[35]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Can we close the Bohr–Einstein quantum debate? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Zhe Yang,et al.  Realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics and encounter-delayed-choice experiment , 2014, 1410.4129.

[37]  Jan-Åke Larsson Bell’s inequality and detector inefficiency , 1998 .

[38]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption , 2012, Nature.

[39]  Armin W. Schulz,et al.  Interpretations of probability , 2003 .

[40]  Gerard 't Hooft,et al.  On the free-will postulate in Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[41]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality , 2017 .

[42]  S. BellJ,et al.  Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen逆理 量子力学での遠隔作用か , 1987 .

[43]  Lila Borg Rohrer Einstein Was Right , 2014 .

[44]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[45]  A. Khrennikov After Bell , 2016, 1603.08674.

[46]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection , 2001, Nature.

[47]  Willem M. de Muynck Interpretations of quantum mechanics, and interpretations of violation of Bell's inequality , 2001 .

[48]  Armen E. Allahverdyan,et al.  Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models , 2011, 1107.2138.

[49]  Garg,et al.  Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. , 1987, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[50]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  Some loopholes to save quantum nonlocality , 2005 .

[51]  Gerard 't Hooft,et al.  The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1405.1548.

[52]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[53]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[54]  J. S. BELLt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[55]  Andrei Khrennikov Statistical measure of ensemble nonreproducibility and correction to Bell's inequality , 2000 .

[56]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[57]  Karl Hess,et al.  Bell’s theorem: Critique of proofs with and without inequalities , 2005 .

[58]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On the equivalence of the Clauser–Horne and Eberhard inequality based tests , 2014, 1403.2811.

[59]  Andrei Khrennikov Frequency Analysis of the EPR-Bell Argumentation , 2002 .

[60]  Philippe Grangier Contextual objectivity: a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2000 .

[61]  Andrei Khrennikov Nonlinear Schrödinger equations from prequantum classical statistical field theory , 2006 .

[62]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  CHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities , 2014, 1406.4886.

[63]  M. Katsnelson,et al.  Quantum theory as the most robust description of reproducible experiments: application to a rigid linear rotator , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[64]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  To quantum averages through asymptotic expansion of classical averages on infinite-dimensional space , 2007 .

[65]  A. Shimony,et al.  Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications , 1978 .