Uplink HARQ for Distributed and Cloud RAN via Separation of Control and Data Planes

The implementation of uplink HARQ in a Cloud- Radio Access Network RAN (C-RAN) architecture is constrained by the two-way latency on the fronthaul links connecting the Remote Radio Heads (RRHs) with the Baseband Units (BBUs) that perform decoding. To overcome this limitation, this work considers an architecture based on the separation of control and data planes, in which retransmission control decisions are made at the edge of the network, that is, by the RRHs or User Equipments (UEs), while data decoding is carried out remotely at the BBUs. This solution enables low-latency local retransmission decisions to be made at the RRHs or UEs, which are not subject to the fronthaul latency constraints, while at the same time leveraging the decoding capability of the BBUs. A system with BBU Hoteling system is considered first in which each RRH has a dedicated BBU in the cloud. For this system, the control-data separation leverages low-latency local feedback from an RRH to drive the HARQ process of a given UE. Throughput and probability of error of this solution are analyzed for the three standard HARQ modes of Type-I, Chase Combining and Incremental Redundancy over a general fading MIMO link. Then, novel user-centric low-latency feedback strategies are proposed and analyzed for the C-RAN architecture, with a single centralized BBU, based on limited "hard" or "soft" local feedback from the RRHs to the UE and on retransmission decisions taken at the UE. The analysis presented in this work allows the optimization of the considered schemes, as well as the investigation of the impact of system parameters such as HARQ protocol type, blocklength and number of antennas on the performance of low-latency local HARQ decisions in BBU Hoteling and C-RAN architectures.

[1]  Navid Nikaein,et al.  Processing Radio Access Network Functions in the Cloud: Critical Issues and Modeling , 2015, MCS '15.

[2]  Michael S. Berger,et al.  Cloud RAN for Mobile Networks—A Technology Overview , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[3]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Benefits and Impact of Cloud Computing on 5G Signal Processing: Flexible centralization through cloud-RAN , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Peter Rost,et al.  Opportunistic Hybrid ARQ—Enabler of Centralized-RAN Over Nonideal Backhaul , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[5]  Marco Levorato,et al.  On the Effect of Fronthaul Latency on ARQ in C-RAN Systems , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  Y. Bar-Ness,et al.  Performance Analysis of Collaborative Hybrid-ARQ Incremental Redundancy Protocols Over Fading Channels , 2006, 2006 IEEE 7th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[7]  Leszek Szczecinski,et al.  Modelling Decoding Errors in HARQ , 2015, ArXiv.

[8]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Quantitative analysis of split base station processing and determination of advantageous architectures for LTE , 2013, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[10]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  The throughput of hybrid-ARQ protocols for the Gaussian collision channel , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Grassmannian beamforming for multiple-input multiple-output wireless systems , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[12]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Control-Data Separation Architecture for Cellular Radio Access Networks: A Survey and Outlook , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Ahmed Saadani,et al.  Base stations evolution: Toward 4G technology , 2012, 2012 19th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[14]  Erik Dahlman,et al.  3G Evolution: HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband , 2007 .

[15]  C-ran the Road towards Green Ran , 2022 .

[16]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  Performance comparison of HARQ with Chase combining and incremental redundancy for HSDPA , 2001, IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Fall 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37211).

[17]  Guillaume Vivier,et al.  Overview of ARQ and HARQ in beyond 3G systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops.

[18]  Rajeev Agrawal,et al.  Performance Analysis of Centralized RAN Deployment with Non-Ideal Fronthaul in LTE-Advanced Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[19]  Giuseppe Durisi,et al.  Quasi-static SIMO fading channels at finite blocklength , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[20]  Osvaldo Simeone,et al.  Control-data separation in cloud RAN: The case of uplink HARQ , 2016, 2016 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[21]  Antonia Maria Tulino,et al.  Random Matrix Theory and Wireless Communications , 2004, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Arturo Azcorra,et al.  Xhaul: toward an integrated fronthaul/backhaul architecture in 5G networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[23]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel coding: non-asymptotic fundamental limits , 2010 .

[24]  Nihar Jindal,et al.  Are yesterday-s information-theoretic fading models and performance metrics adequate for the analysis of today's wireless systems? , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.