The effects of deductive instruction and inductive instruction on learners’ development of pragmatic competence in the teaching of Chinese as a second language

Abstract Pragmatic competence determines one's overall communicative competence and can be developed through pedagogical interventions. The existing literature generally agrees on the effectiveness of explicit instruction in the development of pragmatic competence, but diverges on when and how explicit knowledge is best provided, and when and how pragmatic input may be most effectively presented. This study adds to the existing literature by comparing the effectiveness of two types of pragmatic instruction – deductive instruction and inductive instruction – via self-access websites in developing Chinese as a second language (CSL) learners' pragmatic competence in the speech act of request. Forty-two intermediate-level CSL learners were randomly assigned to the two treatment conditions, and their performance in open-ended discourse completion tasks (DCT) was compared across the two groups. The study found a significantly greater effect of the inductive approach on learners' DCT performance in both the immediate and delayed posttest. This suggests that inductive instruction might be more effective in teaching the speech act of request in CSL.

[1]  Gail W. Pieper,et al.  The Comprehensive Handbook of Constructivist Teaching: From Theory to Practice , 2010 .

[2]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  HYPOTHESIS TESTING IN SECOND-LANGUAGE ACQUISITION THEORY , 1986 .

[3]  Duan Ling-li.  The Effects of Explicit and Implicit Instruction in English Refusals , 2010 .

[4]  G. Kasper,et al.  Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics , 1991, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  V. T. Laughlin,et al.  Defining and Operationalizing the Construct of Pragmatic Competence: Review and Recommendations , 2015 .

[6]  Terry A. Osborn,et al.  The Foreign Language Educator in Society: Toward A Critical Pedagogy , 2001 .

[7]  Grace Zhang,et al.  Request Strategies: A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean , 2008 .

[8]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[9]  Robert DeKeyser,et al.  Learning Second Language Grammar Rules , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  Jong Suk Kim.  The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies , 2005 .

[11]  Farahman Farrokhi,et al.  The Role of Refusal Instruction in Pragmatic Development , 2012 .

[12]  Andrea Golato.  Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk , 2003 .

[13]  Carol A. Herron,et al.  Effectiveness of a Guided Inductive Versus a Deductive Approach on the Learning of Grammar in the Intermediate‐Level College French Classroom , 2011 .

[14]  Xuesong Gao,et al.  The teaching of Chinese as a second or foreign language: a systematic review of the literature 2005–2015 , 2017 .

[15]  Kenneth R. Rose.  Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response , 1992 .

[16]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Can pragmatic competence be taught , 1997 .

[17]  M. Takimoto.  The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Instruction on the Development of Language Learners' Pragmatic Competence , 2008 .

[18]  J. House.  Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  G. Kasper,et al.  Pragmatics in Second Language Learning , 2005 .

[20]  Kristine Billmyer,et al.  Investigating the Structure of Discourse Completion Tests. , 1996 .

[21]  S. Yamashita.  10. Investigating Interlanguage Pragmatic Ability: What Are We Testing? , 2008 .

[22]  D. Yoshimi.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Explicit instruction and JFL learner's use of interactional discourse markers , 2001 .

[23]  Ali Derakhshan,et al.  Video-Driven Prompts: Aviable Pragmatic Consciousness-Raising Approach in EFL/ESL Classrooms , 2014 .

[24]  Günther Sigott,et al.  Measuring Interlanguage Pragmatic Knowledge of EFL Learners , 2005 .

[25]  Satomi Takahashi.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence , 2001 .

[26]  Eva Alcón Soler,et al.  Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context , 2005 .

[27]  G. Engelhard,et al.  Using Rasch Measurement Theory to Examine Two Instructional Approaches for Teaching and Learning of French Grammar , 2011 .

[28]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Acquiring Grammatical Structures by Guided Induction , 1992 .

[29]  Tarja Nikula.  Pragmatic force modifiers : a study in interlanguage pragmatics , 1996 .

[30]  Kenneth R. Rose,et al.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses , 2001 .

[31]  Gila A. Schauer,et al.  Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context , 2009 .

[32]  Wilfried Decoo,et al.  THE INDUCTION-DEDUCTION OPPOSITION: AMBIGUITIES AND COMPLEXITIES OF THE DIDACTIC REALITY , 1996 .

[33]  J. César Félix-Brasdefer,et al.  Data collection methods in speech act performance , 2010 .

[34]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams.  Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics , 2014 .

[35]  Karl Josef Klauer,et al.  Teaching inductive reasoning: some theory and three experimental studies , 1996 .

[36]  R. Dekeyser.  Implicit and Explicit Learning , 2008 .

[37]  James Dean Brown,et al.  A Framework for Testing Cross-Cultural Pragmatics , 1992 .

[38]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[39]  Kenneth R. Rose,et al.  On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics , 2005 .

[40]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[41]  Yuet Ying Elaine Chan.  The effects of deductive and inductive approaches on the acquisition of grammatical structures in second language : the case of the passive voice among secondary two students in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[42]  G. Jean,et al.  Deductive versus inductive grammar instruction: Investigating possible relationships between gains, preferences and learning styles , 2013 .

[43]  Carrie E. Haight,et al.  The Effects of Deductive and Guided Inductive Instructional Approaches on the Learning of Grammar in the Elementary Foreign Language College Classroom , 2007 .

[44]  W. Ren.  THE EFFECT OF STUDY ABROAD ON THE PRAGMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNAL MODIFICATION OF REFUSALS , 2013 .

[45]  Kenneth R. Rose,et al.  Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2☆ , 2009 .

[46]  The Impact of Using Authentic Audio-Taped and Video-Taped Materials on the Level of EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence , 2010 .

[47]  C. Fosnot.  Constructivism : theory, perspectives, and practice , 1996 .

[48]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[49]  Elite Olshtain,et al.  Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1 , 1984 .

[50]  Nicola Halenko,et al.  Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? , 2011 .

[51]  Alicia Martínez-Flor,et al.  Approaches to language learning and teaching: Towards acquiring communicative competence through the four skills , 2006 .

[52]  K. Bardovi-Harlig.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? , 2001 .

[53]  Karen M Glaser,et al.  News from the pragmatics classroom: Contrasting the inductive and the deductive approach in the teaching of pragmatic competence , 2016 .

[54]  Shuai Li.  The Effects of Input-Based Practice on Pragmatic Development of Requests in L2 Chinese , 2012 .