Moderate Bioclogging Leading to Preferential Flow Paths in Biobarriers

Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) are an alternative technique for the biological in situ remediation of ground water contaminants. Nutrient supply via injection well galleries is supposed to support a high microbial activity in these barriers but can ultimately lead to changes in the hydraulic conductivity of the biobarrier due to the accumulation of biomass in the aquifer. This effect, called bioclogging, would limit the remediation efficiency of the biobarrier. To evaluate the effects bioclogging can have on the flow field of a PRB, flow cell experiments were carried out in the laboratory using glass beads as a porous medium. Two types of flow cells were used: a 20- 3 1- 3 1-cm cell simulating a single injection well in a onedimensional flow field and a 20- 3 10- 3 1-cm cell simulating an injection well gallery in a two-dimensional flow field. A mineral medium was injected to promote microbial growth. Results of 9 d of continuous operation showed that conditions, which led to a moderate (50%) reduction of the hydraulic conductivity of the one-dimensional cell, led to a preferential flow pattern within the simulated barrier in the two-dimensional flow field (visualized by a tracer dye). The bioclogging leading to this preferential flow pattern did not change the hydraulic conductivity of the biobarrier as a whole but resulted in a reduced residence time of water within barrier. The biomass distribution measured after 9 d was consistent with the observed clogging effects showing step spatial gradients between clogged and unclogged regions.

[1]  P Vandevivere,et al.  Effect of bacterial extracellular polymers on the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand columns , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Microbial Clogging of Saturated Soils and Aquifer Materials: Evaluation of Mathematical Models , 1995 .

[3]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[4]  Arun R. Gavaskar,et al.  Permeable barriers for groundwater remediation : design, construction, and monitoring , 1998 .

[5]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Full-Scale Evaluation of In Situ Cometabolic Degradation of Trichloroethylene in Groundwater through Toluene Injection , 1998 .

[6]  E. Lavernia,et al.  An experimental investigation , 1992, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[7]  J. Vecchioli A Note on Bacterial Growth Around a Recharge Well at Bay Park, Long Island, New York , 1970 .

[8]  James M. Tiedje,et al.  Hydraulic Characterization and Design of a Full‐Scale Biocurtain , 2000 .

[9]  M. Rebhun,et al.  Clogging and Contamination Processes in Recharge Wells , 1968 .

[10]  Stewart W. Taylor,et al.  Biofilm growth and the related changes in the physical properties of a porous medium: 1. Experimental investigation , 1990 .

[11]  D. Kooij,et al.  Sulfate‐Reducing Bacteria in Ground Water from Clogging and Nonclogging Shallow Wells in the Netherlands River Region , 1982 .

[12]  R. Kalin Engineered passive bioreactive barriers: risk-managing the legacy of industrial soil and groundwater pollution. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[13]  S. Davis,et al.  Dairy Waste Ponds Effectively Self - Sealing , 1973 .

[14]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Modeling of a microbial growth experiment with bioclogging in a two-dimensional saturated porous media flow field. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[15]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Environmental impact and mechanisms of the biological clogging of saturated soils and aquifer materials , 1998 .

[16]  Alfred B. Cunningham,et al.  Influence of Biofilm Accumulation on Porous Media Hydrodynamics , 1991 .

[17]  R. W. Weaver,et al.  Microbiological and biochemical properties , 1994 .

[18]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Influence of Microbial Growth on Hydraulic Properties of Pore Networks , 2002, Groundwater 2000.

[19]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Reduction Caused by Aerobic Bacteria in Sand Columns , 1992 .

[20]  R. L. Valentine,et al.  Chemistry and Microbiology of Permeable Reactive Barriers for In Situ Groundwater Clean up , 2000 .

[21]  T. L. Stewart,et al.  Pore‐scale investigation of biomass plug development and propagation in porous media , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  C. Criddle,et al.  Development, operation, and long-term performance of a full-scale biocurtain utilizing bioaugmentation. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Peter Engesgaard,et al.  Tracer Tests and Image Analysis of Biological Clogging in a Two‐Dimensional Sandbox Experiment , 2002 .

[24]  Seki,et al.  Effects of microorganisms on hydraulic conductivity decrease in infiltration , 1998 .

[25]  J. Oberdorfer,et al.  Waste‐Water Injection: Geochemical and Biogeochemical Clogging Processes , 1985 .

[26]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Interaction between water flow and spatial distribution of microbial growth in a two-dimensional flow field in saturated porous media. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[27]  John M. Shafer,et al.  Funnel‐and‐Gate Performance in a Moderately Heterogeneous Flow Domain , 2001 .

[28]  Rolv Kristiansen Sand-Filter Trenches for Purification of Septic Tank Effluent: I. The Clogging Mechanism and Soil Physical Environment 1 , 1981 .