Amount of information and the willingness of consumers to pay for food traceability in China

Abstract There is no consensus about whether the food traceability system planned for construction in China or other countries should record detailed information like the beef traceability system in Japan, or simple abbreviated information similar to that provided in the USA. Using apple as a research subject, we adopted random n th price experimental auction to investigate the willingness to pay (WTP) for traceability based on abbreviated and detailed information among consumers in China. Totally 88 participants attended the experimental auction. The results showed that consumers had a positive WTP for both types of food traceability system, but the average premium that consumers were prepared to pay for traceability with detailed information was 10% higher than that with abbreviated information. Males, married subjects, and those with a relatively low educational level placed a higher premium on traceability with detailed information, but consumers with good self-reported health did not want to pay a high premium for traceability with detailed information. The results also showed that consumers were most interested in a food traceability system that provides quality certificates and details of the chemical fertilizers/pesticides used in food production. We discuss the implications of these results for the implementation of a food traceability system.

[1]  Shaosheng Jin,et al.  Consumer interest in information provided by food traceability systems in Japan , 2014 .

[2]  Matthew C. Rousu,et al.  Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial Collaboration , 2012 .

[3]  Linhai Wu,et al.  Factors Affecting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Certified Traceable Food in Jiangsu Province of China , 2012 .

[4]  Davide Menozzi,et al.  Motives towards traceable food choice: A comparison between French and Italian consumers , 2015 .

[5]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Traceability from a US perspective. , 2005, Meat science.

[6]  Jing Jiang,et al.  The role of certificate issuer on consumers’ willingness‐to‐pay for milk traceability in China , 2013 .

[7]  DeeVon Bailey,et al.  Traceability in the Canadian Red Meat Sector: Do Consumers Care? , 2005 .

[8]  George M. Chryssochoidis,et al.  Traceability information carriers. The technology backgrounds and consumers’ perceptions of the technological solutions , 2009, Appetite.

[9]  Y. Chang,et al.  Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives , 2014 .

[10]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[11]  B. Roe,et al.  The Economics of Labeling: An Overview of Issues for Health and Environmental Disclosure , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[12]  M. Loureiro,et al.  A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability , 2007 .

[13]  K. Rickertsen,et al.  European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets , 2003 .

[14]  J. Lusk Using Experimental Auctions for Marketing Applications: A Discussion , 2003, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[15]  J. Caswell,et al.  The Economics of Implementing Traceability in Beef Supply Chains: Trends in Major Producing and Trading Countries , 2004 .

[16]  L. Frewer,et al.  Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of the associated benefits , 2008 .

[17]  Matthew T.G. Meulenberg,et al.  A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease , 2002 .

[18]  L. Frewer,et al.  Consumer needs and requirements for food and ingredient traceability information , 2012 .

[19]  Xueqin Zhu,et al.  High content of five heavy metals in four fruits: Evidence from a case study of Pujiang County, Zhejiang Province, China , 2014 .

[20]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries , 2007 .

[21]  Rodolfo M. Nayga,et al.  Valuing Traceability of Imported Beef in Korea: An Experimental Auction Approach , 2011 .

[22]  G. Gebresenbet,et al.  Food traceability as an integral part of logistics management in food and agricultural supply chain , 2013 .

[23]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Valuing an EU Animal Welfare Label using Experimental Auctions , 2011 .

[24]  S. Henauw,et al.  Determinants of nutrition knowledge in young and middle-aged Belgian women and the association with their dietary behaviour , 2009, Appetite.

[25]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumer Perception of Traceability in the Meat Chain , 2001 .

[26]  Xu Zhang,et al.  Modeling and implementation of the vegetable supply chain traceability system , 2013 .

[27]  Zetian Fu,et al.  Development and evaluation on a RFID-based traceability system for cattle/beef quality safety in China , 2013 .

[28]  S. Kroll,et al.  Is it love for local/organic or hate for conventional? Asymmetric effects of information and taste on label preferences in an experimental auction , 2014 .

[29]  S. J. Breiner PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF COW-CALF PRODUCERS TOWARD EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND POLICY ISSUES IN THE BEEF CATTLE INDUSTRY , 2007 .

[30]  David L. Ortega,et al.  Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China , 2011 .

[31]  J. Shogren,et al.  Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research , 2007 .

[32]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It? , 2002 .

[33]  Andreas C. Drichoutis,et al.  Would consumers value food-away-from-home products with nutritional labels? , 2009 .

[34]  Hung‐Hao Chang,et al.  Why is the food traceability system unsuccessful in Taiwan? Empirical evidence from a national survey of fruit and vegetable farmers , 2011 .

[35]  Andreas C. Drichoutis,et al.  Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels , 2005 .

[36]  George Chryssochoidis,et al.  European Consumers’ Perceptions, Definitions and Expectations of Traceability and the Importance of Labels, and the Differences in These Perceptions by Product Type , 2007 .

[37]  Gene Rowe,et al.  The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and Priorities , 2008 .

[38]  W. Chern,et al.  Benefit evaluation of the country of origin labeling in Taiwan: Results from an auction experiment , 2012 .

[39]  Jill E. Hobbs,et al.  Information asymmetry and the role of traceability systems , 2004 .

[40]  Linhai Wu,et al.  Consumer preference and demand for traceable food attributes , 2016 .

[41]  J. Bai,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for traceable pork, milk, and cooking oil in Nanjing, China , 2012 .

[42]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability , 2010, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[43]  Dian Zhu,et al.  Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for pork traceability information—the case of Wuxi , 2016 .

[44]  Yvette Salaün,et al.  Information quality: meeting the needs of the consumer , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[45]  Matthew C. Rousu,et al.  Designing Experimental Auctions for Marketing Research: The Effect of Values, Distributions, and Mechanisms on Incentives for Truthful Bidding , 2007 .

[46]  John A. List,et al.  A random nth-price auction , 2001 .

[47]  Pierre Combris,et al.  Eco-labelled food products: what are consumers paying for? , 2009 .

[48]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels , 2006 .

[49]  Ellen Goddard,et al.  A Taste for Safer Beef? How Much Does Consumers’ Perceived Risk Influence Willingness to Pay for Country‐of‐Origin Labeled Beef , 2014 .

[50]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load , 1974 .

[51]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework , 2008 .

[52]  K. Foster,et al.  Quality Certification vs. Product Traceability: Consumer Preferences for Informational Attributes of Pork in Georgia * , 2009 .

[53]  W. Huffman,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Fresh Food Items with Multiple Quality Attributes: Evidence from an Experimental Auction of Pork Chops , 1996 .

[54]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[55]  Didier Montet,et al.  Review of the current methods of analytical traceability allowing determination of the origin of foodstuffs , 2007 .

[56]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Chinese consumers' understanding and use of a food nutrition label and their determinants , 2015 .

[57]  Stamatis Aggelopoulos,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of quality assurance systems in small food enterprises. , 2009 .

[58]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Agriculture and the food industry in the information age , 2005 .

[59]  D. Hu,et al.  Food Safety Improvements Underway in China , 2006 .