Sent from My iPhone: The Medium and Message as Cues of Sender Professionalism in Mobile Telephony

The growing ubiquity of mobile telephony able to send e-mail raises new questions, and renews old issues, about the effect of the medium on a message. This article reports experimental results testing effects of user- and medium-generated cues on perceptions of message senders. Grounded in warranting theory, we assess the interaction of low- and high-warrant cues on perceptions of the sender's professionalism, hypothesizing senders of grammatically accurate messages are perceived as more credible. However, we also hypothesize an interaction between grammatical accuracy and the system-generated high-warrant cues from the mobile device used to send the message. Responses from 111 students assessing the credibility of an e-mail sender indicate that, although a message's user-generated content (grammatically accurate vs. erred) influences receiver's perceptions, negative attributions are attenuated by cues reflecting the transmission medium (i.e., a message's mobile signature block). Findings offer theoretical implications for warranting theory. Additionally, results suggest practitioners need to craft a message and indicate the transmission medium strategically to mitigate any impacts on attributions of professionalism to message receivers.

[1]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement , 1999 .

[2]  Sandra Poeschl,et al.  Nonverbal Cues in Mobile Phone Text Messages: The Effects of Chronemics and Proxemics , 2007 .

[3]  Timothy J. Fogarty,et al.  Organizational socialization in accounting firms: A theoretical framework and agenda for future research , 1992 .

[4]  R. Rubin The role of context in information seeking and impression formation , 1977 .

[5]  Sherri L. Jessmer,et al.  The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. , 2001 .

[6]  Daantje Derks,et al.  The Impact of E-mail Communication on Organizational Life , 2010 .

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[8]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating , 2011, Commun. Res..

[9]  Q. Mcnemar,et al.  Opinion-attitude methodology. , 1946, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[11]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication , 2010, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[12]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  A Sign of the Times: An Analysis of Organizational Members' Email Signatures , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Yoram M. Kalman,et al.  Pauses and Response Latencies: A Chronemic Analysis of Asynchronous CMC , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Jack G. Conrad,et al.  Professional credibility: authority on the web , 2008, WICOW '08.

[16]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[17]  George Cheney,et al.  Considering “The Professional” in Communication Studies: Implications for Theory and Research Within and Beyond the Boundaries of Organizational Communication , 2007 .

[18]  Keri K. Stephens,et al.  R U Able to Meat Me: The Impact of Students’ Overly Casual Email Messages to Instructors , 2009 .

[19]  Phil Hodkinson,et al.  The Challenge of Competence: Professionalism Through Vocational Education and Training , 1995 .

[20]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[21]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited , 2001, Commun. Res..

[22]  James E. Katz,et al.  Magic in the Air: Mobile Communication and the Transformation of Social Life , 2006 .

[23]  Jeanette S. Martin,et al.  CEO blogs: credibility issues , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[24]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  One-Tailed F-tests in communication research , 2002 .

[26]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight , 1987 .

[27]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  Social Implications of Mobile Telephony: The Rise of Personal Communication Society , 2008 .

[28]  P. Dunham Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited An Analysis of the Breadth and Intensity of Impressions , 2001 .

[29]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Practising mobile professional work: tales of locational, operational, and interactional mobility , 2004 .

[30]  Scott C. D'Urso,et al.  Connected to the Organization: A Survey of Communication Technologies in the Modern Organizational Landscape , 2009 .

[31]  C. Jones Written and Computer-Mediated Accounting Communication Skills , 2011 .

[32]  Yoram M. Kalman,et al.  Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated Communication , 2011, Commun. Res..

[33]  G. Bentele,et al.  Trust and Credibility — Prerequisites for Communication Management , 2008 .

[34]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[35]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS , 2009 .

[36]  William W. Cohen,et al.  Learning to Extract Signature and Reply Lines from Email , 2004, CEAS.

[37]  Catherine A. Riordan,et al.  Effect of Self-Presentation on Perceptions and Recognition in an Organization , 1990 .

[39]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[40]  Minae Park SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN ELECTRONIC MEETINGS , 2010 .

[41]  Stephen A. Rains What's in a name?: two studies examining the impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence , 2005 .

[42]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[44]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[45]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[46]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[47]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Richness, power cues and email text , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Kathryn M. Bartol,et al.  Professionalism as a predictor of organizational commitment, role stress, and turnover: a multidim , 1979 .

[49]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[50]  Karen K. Waner Business Communication Competencies Needed by Employees as Perceived by Business Faculty and Business Professionals , 1995 .

[51]  G. Koeske,et al.  Perceptions of professional competence: cross-disciplinary ratings of psychologists, social workers, and psychiatrists. , 1993, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

[52]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[53]  Lisa Koonce,et al.  How Disaggregation Enhances the Credibility of Management Earnings Forecasts , 2007 .

[54]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  Jennifer M. Heisler,et al.  Who are "stinkybug" and "Packerfan4"? Email Pseudonyms and Participants' Perceptions of Demography, Productivity, and Personality , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[56]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[57]  F. Morgeson,et al.  Self-presentation processes in job analysis: a field experiment investigating inflation in abilities, tasks, and competencies. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  F. T. McAndrew,et al.  Electronic Person Perception , 2011 .

[59]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[60]  Power, Measure, and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace/Women Changing Work/Dishing It Out: Power and Resistance among Waitresses in a New Jersey Restaurant , 1991 .

[61]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes , 1987 .

[62]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[63]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Communication Rules for the Display of Emotions in Organizational Settings , 2002 .

[64]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[65]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings , 1987 .

[66]  Descriptors Higher Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association , 1974 .

[67]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Theories, Boundaries, and All of the Above , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[68]  DAANTJE DERKS,et al.  Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Motives and Social Context , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[69]  Gunasti Hudiwinarsih AUDITORS’ EXPERIENCE, COMPETENCY, AND THEIR INDEPENDENCY AS THE INFLUENCIAL FACTORS IN PROFESSIONALISM , 2011 .

[70]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? , 1979 .

[71]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[72]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  What Are Emotion Expressions For ? , 2011 .