Aerial imaging for source mask optimization: mask and illumination qualification

As the semiconductor industry moved to 4X technology nodes and below, low-k1 ArF lithography approached the theoretical limits of single patterning resolution, a regime typically plagued by marginally small process windows. In order to widen the process window bottleneck, projection lithography must fully and synergistically employ all available degrees of freedom. The holistic lithography source mask optimization (SMO) methodology aims to increase the overall litho performance and achieve a robust process window for the most challenging patterns by balancing between the mask and illumination source design influences. The typical complexity of both mask and illumination source that results from a generic SMO process exceeds the current norm in the lithographic industry. In particular, the SMO literature reports on masks that fully operate as diffractive optical elements, with features that have little resemblance to the final wafer-level pattern. Additionally, SMO illumination sources are characterized by parametric or pixelated shapes and a wide range of transmission values. As a consequence of the new mask and source designs, qualifying the mask for printing and non-printing defects and accurate assessment of critical dimensions becomes one of the main mask inspection challenges. The aerial imaging technologies of Applied Material's Aera2TM mask inspection tool provide enabling solutions by separating out only the defects that matter and accurately measures aerial imaging critical dimensions. This paper presents the latest numerical and experimental SMO mask qualifications research results performed at Applied Materials with a mask containing two-dimensional DRAM production structures.

[1]  Christopher J. Progler The optics of photomasks: from shadowy past to scattered future , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Scott Halle,et al.  Experimental result and simulation analysis for the use of pixelated illumination from source mask optimization for 22nm logic lithography process , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Kafai Lai,et al.  Intensive optimization of masks and sources for 22nm lithography , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Yuri Granik,et al.  Illuminator optimization methods in microlithography , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Jo Finders,et al.  An IntenCD map of a reticle as a feed-forward input to DoseMapper , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[6]  C. Mack Fundamental principles of optical lithography , 2007 .

[7]  Shmoolik Mangan,et al.  What you see is what you print: aerial imaging as an optimal discriminator between printing and non-printing photomask defects , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[8]  Robert John Socha,et al.  An innovative Source-Mask co-Optimization (SMO) method for extending low k1 imaging , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[9]  E. H. Linfoot Principles of Optics , 1961 .

[10]  Yong-Hoon Kim,et al.  Practical application of aerial imaging mask inspection for memory devices , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[11]  Igor Bouchoms,et al.  Imaging solutions for the 22nm node using 1.35NA , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.  Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape , 2002 .

[13]  Alfred Kwok-Kit Wong,et al.  Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography , 2001 .