Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: a quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media

Journal publication has long been relied on as the only required communication of results, tasking journalists with bringing news of scientific discoveries to the public. Output of science papers increased 15% between 1990 and 2001, with total output over 650,000. But, fewer than 0.013—0.34% of papers gained attention from mass media, with health/medicine papers taking the lion’s share of coverage. Fields outside of health/medicine had an appearance rate of only 0.001—0.005%. In light of findings that show scientific literacy declining despite growing public interest and scientific output, this study attempts to show that reliance on journal publication and subsequent coverage by the media as the sole form of communication en masse is failing to communicate science to the public.

[1]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Press releases: translating research into news. , 2002, JAMA.

[2]  D. Phillips,et al.  Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Emma. Weitkamp,et al.  British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science news , 2003 .

[4]  M. Grossel,et al.  Science in the news : a study of reporting genomics , 2004 .

[5]  V de Semir,et al.  Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[7]  Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond,et al.  About misunderstandings about misunderstandings , 1992 .

[8]  V. Kiernan.  Embargoes and Science News , 2003 .

[9]  James W. Tankard,et al.  News Source Perceptions of Accuracy of Science Coverage , 1974 .

[10]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Media Coverage and Public Opinion on Scientific Controversies , 1981 .

[11]  Debbie Treise,et al.  Advancing Science Communication , 2002 .

[12]  K A Arndt,et al.  Information excess in medicine. Overview, relevance to dermatology, and strategies for coping. , 1992, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Scientists as Mass Media Sources , 1982 .

[14]  Eleanor Singer,et al.  A Question of Accuracy: How Journalists and Scientists Report Research on Hazards. , 1990 .

[15]  D. Nelkin,et al.  An uneasy relationship: the tensions between medicine and the media , 1996, The Lancet.

[16]  F. Rowland.  President's Lecture: The Need for Scientific Communication with the Public. , 1993, Science.

[17]  Jim Hartz,et al.  Worlds Apart How The Distance Between Science And Journalism Threatens Americas Future , 2005 .

[18]  Jo Ellen Stryker,et al.  Reporting medical information: effects of press releases and newsworthiness on medical journal articles' visibility in the news media. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[19]  B. Lightman.  Marketing knowledge for the general reader: Victorian popularizers of science , 2000 .

[20]  Susan Stocklmayer,et al.  Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .

[21]  A. Ferri,et al.  Scientists' Reasons for Consenting to Mass Media Interviews: A National Survey , 1991 .

[22]  D. Lynn Pulford,et al.  Follow-Up of Study of Science News Accuracy , 1976 .

[23]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[24]  Marianne Pellechia,et al.  Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers , 1997 .

[25]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? , 2002, Commun. Res..