A comparative study of small-scale rural energy service pathways for lighting, cooking and mechanical power

The strong international growth of biofuels in the last decade brought the interest in bioenergy back on the agenda. While many life cycle assessments for biofuels mainly focus on environmental impacts and costs, over the last decade especially the energy balance of biofuel production chains has been a major point of criticism. This study applies a specially adapted and LCA-based analytical framework for rural energy service pathways (RESPs) to compare the use of Jatropha plant oil and biogas with other small-scale RESPs for lighting, cooking and mechanical power. The aim is to analyse their technological feasibility and economical viability by comparing the energy and cost efficiency. Results show strong differences for the investigated plant oil production and processing pathways, while the comparison with a baseline and a competitive renewable energy scenario reveals a weak performance of plant oil and even biogas in the categories of lighting and cooking. The potential for mechanical power depends largely on the careful optimisation of the energy service pathway by balancing the capital, energy, labour, and transport intensity. For the present case, the village scale production of Jatropha plant oil and biogas and their simultaneous use in a dual fuel engine to locally provide power and electricity would be the service pathway with the highest potential in terms of energy and cost efficiency.

[1]  Mbc Myriam Aries,et al.  Lighting performance and electrical energy consumption of a virtual window prototype , 2014 .

[2]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[3]  C. Grima-Olmedo,et al.  Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker , 2014 .

[4]  O. Edenhofer Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[5]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels , 2009 .

[6]  G. Timilsina,et al.  How much hope should we have for biofuels , 2011 .

[7]  Kritana Prueksakorn,et al.  Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. in Thailand. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Suani Teixeira Coelho,et al.  Traditional Biomass Energy: Improving Its Use and Moving to Modern Energy Use , 2012 .

[9]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Bioenergy and sustainable development , 2007 .

[11]  van der Plas,et al.  A comparison of lamps for domestic lighting in developing countries , 1988 .

[12]  K. Openshaw A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise☆ , 2000 .

[13]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Welt im Wandel: Erhaltung und nachhaltige Nutzung der Biosphäre , 1999 .

[14]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand , 2009 .

[15]  Rolf Widmer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of village electrification based on straight jatropha oil in Chhattisgarh, India , 2010 .

[16]  Electo Eduardo Silva Lora,et al.  Issues to consider, existing tools and constraints in biofuels sustainability assessments. , 2011 .

[17]  A. Varshney,et al.  Jatropha curcas: a review on biotechnological status and challenges , 2011, Plant Biotechnology Reports.

[18]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[19]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance , 2010 .

[20]  Richard Brittaine,et al.  Jatropha: a smallholder bioenergy crop: the potential for pro-poor development. , 2010 .

[21]  May Ying Koh,et al.  A review of biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas L. oil , 2011 .

[22]  S. Mourato,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments , 2006 .

[23]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[24]  A relevant LCA methodology adapted to biomass-based products. , 2008 .

[25]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Energy analysis of Jatropha plantation systems for biodiesel production in Thailand , 2010 .

[26]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India , 2010 .

[27]  Salvatore Faugno,et al.  Appraising Bioenergy Alternatives in Uganda Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Desirability Functions Approach , 2014 .

[28]  S. Mahapatra,et al.  Evaluation of various energy devices for domestic lighting in India: Technology, economics and CO2 emissions , 2009 .

[29]  Varun,et al.  LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review , 2009 .

[30]  C. Kemfert,et al.  An overview of biofuel policies across the world , 2010 .

[31]  S. Wani,et al.  Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: A review , 2010 .

[32]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[33]  J. Heller Physic nut: Jatropha curcas L. , 1996 .

[34]  D. Howard,et al.  A systematic review of life cycle assessments of bioenergy chains for heat, power and liquid transportation fuel , 2008 .

[35]  Freyr Sverrisson,et al.  Renewables 2014 : global status report , 2014 .

[36]  R. Jongschaap,et al.  Claims and facts on Jatropha curcas L. : global Jatropha curcas evaluation. breeding and propagation programme , 2007 .

[37]  Eng Seng Chan,et al.  Biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas: a critical review , 2011, Critical reviews in biotechnology.