Synchronous Information Presented in 40-HZ Flicker Enhances Visual Feature Binding

Recent neurophysiological studies have encouraged speculation that the synchronization of spatially distributed neural assemblies (at around 40 Hz in the neocortex) is responsible for the binding of discrete stimulus components into coherent wholes during visual object perception. Using a novel paradigm, we demonstrated specific figural priming under 40-Hz stimulus modulation conditions. Further, under these conditions, observers were not aware of the prime's existence, nor did the prime act as a stimulus-driven attentional cue. These findings provide the first psychophysical support for a theory of preattentive coding of visual objects, based on an externally entrained and thereby synchronized 40-Hz feature-binding mechanism.

[1]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[2]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[3]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  E. Azmitia Microcultures of Dissociated Primary Central Nervous System Neurons , 1990 .

[6]  J. Pernier,et al.  Gamma‐range Activity Evoked by Coherent Visual Stimuli in Humans , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Properties and Feature Dependence , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  M Fahle,et al.  Figure–ground discrimination from temporal information , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  D. Contreras,et al.  Synchronization of fast (30-40 Hz) spontaneous cortical rhythms during brain activation , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  P. Kellman,et al.  Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Izumi Ohzawa,et al.  Pathways in the visual cortex revealed by receptive field mapping of correlated discharge , 1991 .

[12]  W. Singer Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[13]  W. Singer,et al.  Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[15]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness , 1990 .

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  James T. Enns,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995 .

[19]  Wolf Singer,et al.  A new job for the thalamus , 1994, Nature.

[20]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[24]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Estimates on probability functions: A more virulent PEST , 1978 .

[25]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995, Psychological review.

[26]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) Activity Induced by a Visual Search Task in Humans , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[30]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Snodderly,et al.  A Dissociation Between Brain Activity and Perception: Chromatically Opponent Cortical Neurons Signal Chromatic Flicker that is not Perceived , 1997, Vision Research.

[32]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma-band responses in the brain: a short review of psychophysiological correlates and functional significance. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus dependent intercolumnar synchronization of single unit responses in cat area 17. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[36]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  The Correlation Theory of Brain Function , 1994 .

[40]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Inter‐Columnar Interaction as Determined by Cross‐Correlation Analysis , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.