Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region

This paper seeks to apply a number of biophysical sustainability metrics to an Irish city-region in order to evaluate the effect of methodological pluralism when measuring urban sustainability and to determine the outcome of using more than one method when measuring the sustainability of the same system boundary at a city-region level. It is concluded that a ‘toolkit’ approach can be useful in highlighting commonalities and differences between different metrics as well as capturing some of the deficiencies inherent in using a single biophysical metric. In addition, this paper develops an approach to measuring energy metabolism by outlining and applying the ‘energy flow metabolism ratio analysis’ methodology, which is used to measure the ratio of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a function of energy material inputs.

[1]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments , 2004 .

[2]  J. Barrett,et al.  A material flow analysis and Ecological Footprint of York , 2002 .

[3]  David Browne,et al.  Use of embodied energy and ecological footprinting to assess the global environmental impact of consumption in an Irish city-region , 2008 .

[4]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Defining and predicting sustainability , 1995 .

[5]  Martin Kaupenjohann,et al.  Parameters, prediction, post-normal science and the precautionary principle: a roadmap for modelling for decision-making , 2001 .

[6]  Helga Weisz,et al.  The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption , 2006 .

[7]  Paul H. Brunner,et al.  Material Flow Analysis: A tool to support environmental policy decision making. Case-studies on the city of Vienna and the Swiss lowlands , 2000 .

[8]  I. Muñiz,et al.  Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona , 2005 .

[9]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[10]  I. Muñiz,et al.  Ecological sustainability and urban form , 2001 .

[11]  Roy F. Weston,et al.  A dynamic, hierarchical approach to understanding and managing natural economic systems , 1997 .

[12]  Jan Kovanda,et al.  What are the possibilities for graphical presentation of decoupling? An example of economy-wide material flow indicators in the Czech Republic , 2007 .

[13]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative transport policy scenarios in an Irish city-region , 2008 .

[14]  S. Dodds,et al.  Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being , 1997 .

[15]  Wei Jin,et al.  Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the Ecological Footprint , 2009 .

[16]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction , 1993 .

[17]  W. Rees.  FORUM: Consuming the earth: the biophysics of sustainability , 1999 .

[18]  Karl K. Rebane,et al.  Energy, entropy, environment: why is protection of the environment objectively difficult? , 1995 .

[19]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Towards an integrated approach for sustainable city planning , 2000 .

[20]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach , 2004 .

[21]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Derivation of energy-embodiment functions to estimate the embodied energy from the material content , 1996 .

[22]  James J. Kay,et al.  An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity , 1999 .

[23]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Net energy analysis : handbook for combining process and input-output analysis , 1976 .

[24]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law , 1998 .

[25]  Murray Patterson,et al.  Ecological Footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions , 2004 .

[26]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[27]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Eco-efficiency of urban material metabolism: a case study in Shenzhen, China , 2007 .

[28]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics , 1991 .

[29]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Social Metabolism and Labour in a Local Context: Changing Environmental Relations on Trinket Island , 2001 .

[30]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  The case for methodological pluralism , 1989 .

[31]  M. Alberti.  Measuring urban sustainability , 1996 .

[32]  Karl-Heinz Erb,et al.  Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments , 2004 .

[33]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[34]  P. Newman.  Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model , 1999 .

[35]  S. Boyden,et al.  The Ecology of a City and Its People , 1983 .

[36]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability , 1996 .

[37]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Policy review on decoupling : development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries , 2005 .

[38]  Andrew Flynn,et al.  Reducing Cardiff’s ecological footprint: A resource accounting tool for sustainable consumption , 2005 .

[39]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability , 1998 .

[40]  Herman E. Daly,et al.  Sustainable Development: From Concept and Theory to Operational Principles , 1990 .

[41]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region , 2009 .

[42]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Mass Balance UK: Mapping UK Resource and Material Flows , 2001 .

[43]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Taking complexity seriously: Policy analysis, triangulation, and sustainable development , 1999 .

[44]  A. Wolman.  THE METABOLISM OF CITIES. , 1965, Scientific American.

[45]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  International Trade, Material Flows and Land Use: Developing a Physical Trade Balance for the European Union , 2001 .

[46]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Sustainability and the built environment at and beyond the city scale , 2004 .

[47]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[48]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .

[49]  Richard Moles,et al.  Assessment of total urban metabolism and metabolic inefficiency in an Irish city-region. , 2009, Waste management.

[50]  Stephen Dovers,et al.  Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics , 2006 .

[51]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics , 1998 .

[52]  R. Rosen.  Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry Into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life , 1991 .

[53]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Frank J. Convery,et al.  Environmental indicators for the urban environment : a literature review , 2000 .

[55]  M. T Brown,et al.  Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view , 1996 .

[56]  Edward Smeets,et al.  Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands , 2000 .

[57]  R. Howarth,et al.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world , 2006 .

[58]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer , 2004 .

[59]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950–2000: using the MEFA framework to monitor society–nature interaction for sustainability , 2004 .

[60]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The first decade of Ecological Economics , 1999 .

[61]  I. Douglas,et al.  The urban environment , 1983 .

[62]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 , 2001 .

[63]  Craig T. Simmons,et al.  The use of Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Analyses as Sustainability Indicators for Sub- national Geographical Areas: A Recommended Way Forward , 2001 .

[64]  John Holmberg,et al.  A compass for sustainable development , 1997 .

[65]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[66]  J. Minx,et al.  Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis , 2006 .

[67]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Sustainability indicators : a compass on the road towards sustainability , 1998 .

[68]  A. Koenig,et al.  Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development , 2001 .

[69]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The Changing Metabolism of Cities , 2007 .

[70]  Mario Giampetro,et al.  Complexity and Scales: The Challenge for Integrated Assessment , 2002 .

[71]  Jesus Ramos-Martin,et al.  Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory , 2003 .