A Combined Radiomics and Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clinically Significant Prostate Lesions on a Publicly Available MRI Dataset

Although prostate cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity in advancing-age males, early diagnosis improves prognosis and modifies the therapy of choice. The aim of this study was the evaluation of a combined radiomics and machine learning approach on a publicly available dataset in order to distinguish a clinically significant from a clinically non-significant prostate lesion. A total of 299 prostate lesions were included in the analysis. A univariate statistical analysis was performed to prove the goodness of the 60 extracted radiomic features in distinguishing prostate lesions. Then, a 10-fold cross-validation was used to train and test some models and the evaluation metrics were calculated; finally, a hold-out was performed and a wrapper feature selection was applied. The employed algorithms were Naïve bayes, K nearest neighbour and some tree-based ones. The tree-based algorithms achieved the highest evaluation metrics, with accuracies over 80%, and area-under-the-curve receiver-operating characteristics below 0.80. Combined machine learning algorithms and radiomics based on clinical, routine, multiparametric, magnetic-resonance imaging were demonstrated to be a useful tool in prostate cancer stratification.

[1]  Saima Rathore,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomic Models of Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review , 2021, Cancers.

[2]  J. Epstein,et al.  Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings , 2018, Histopathology.

[3]  Madhu S. Nair,et al.  Computer-aided grading of prostate cancer from MRI images using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  Davide Anguita,et al.  The 'K' in K-fold Cross Validation , 2012, ESANN.

[5]  Pat Langley,et al.  An Analysis of Bayesian Classifiers , 1992, AAAI.

[6]  Holden H. Wu,et al.  Deep transfer learning-based prostate cancer classification using 3 Tesla multi-parametric MRI , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[7]  Ahmad Chaddad,et al.  Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[8]  Michael Götz,et al.  Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values. , 2018, Radiology.

[9]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2021, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Gianni D'Addio,et al.  Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning , 2021, Sensors.

[11]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of radiomics features in apparent diffusion coefficient maps from a multi-centre test-retest trial , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[12]  M. Cesarelli,et al.  Machine learning to predict mortality after rehabilitation among patients with severe stroke , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Radiomics and Prostate MRI: Current Role and Future Applications , 2021, J. Imaging.

[15]  C. Catalano,et al.  MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy: performing exclusively targeted biopsies for the early detection of prostate cancer , 2018, La radiologia medica.

[16]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Software review: the KNIME workflow environment and its applications in genetic programming and machine learning , 2015, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[17]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Deep Myometrial Infiltration of Endometrial Cancer on MRI: A Radiomics-Powered Machine Learning Pilot Study. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[18]  Lorenzo Ugga,et al.  Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a meta-analysis , 2020, European Radiology.

[19]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  MRI based radiomics in nasopharyngeal cancer: Systematic review and perspectives using radiomic quality score (RQS) assessment. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for High Dimensional Sparse Output , 2017, ICML.

[21]  J. Richenberg PI-RADS: past, present and future. , 2016, Clinical radiology.

[22]  Xin Yang,et al.  Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Tri Dev Acharya,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China) , 2018 .

[24]  Daniel Kostrzewa,et al.  The Data Dimensionality Reduction in the Classification Process Through Greedy Backward Feature Elimination , 2017, ICMMI.

[25]  Mauro Castelli,et al.  A Hybrid End-to-End Approach Integrating Conditional Random Fields into CNNs for Prostate Cancer Detection on MRI , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[26]  Tong Chen,et al.  Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic‐Based Model vs. PI‐RADS v2 , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  P. Tomà,et al.  Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent-Related Toxicities , 2018, CNS Drugs.

[28]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[29]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Prostate MRI radiomics: A systematic review and radiomic quality score assessment. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Sanyam Shukla,et al.  Analysis of k-Fold Cross-Validation over Hold-Out Validation on Colossal Datasets for Quality Classification , 2016, 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC).

[32]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[33]  J. Renzulli,et al.  Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post-prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection? , 2017, Human pathology.

[34]  David Atkinson,et al.  Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists , 2019, European Radiology.

[35]  I. Maqsood,et al.  Random Forests and Decision Trees , 2012 .

[36]  H. Kang,et al.  Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reader Experience Matters , 2021, European urology open science.

[37]  Nittaya Kerdprasop,et al.  An Empirical Study of Distance Metrics for k-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm , 2015 .

[38]  H. Thoeny,et al.  Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report , 2016, Cancer Imaging.

[39]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Approach to Zonal Segmentation of the Prostate on MRI , 2012, MICCAI.

[40]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Quality control and whole-gland, zonal and lesion annotations for the PROSTATEx challenge public dataset. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[41]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  Zone-specific logistic regression models improve classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI , 2015, European Radiology.

[42]  Xin Yang,et al.  Automated Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in mp-MRI Images Based on an End-to-End Deep Neural Network , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  E. Valuations,et al.  A R EVIEW ON E VALUATION M ETRICS F OR D ATA C LASSIFICATION E VALUATIONS , 2015 .

[44]  S. Maier,et al.  Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial , 2021, European Radiology.

[45]  Artur Przelaskowski,et al.  MRI imaging texture features in prostate lesions classification , 2017 .

[46]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Automated Prostate Gland Segmentation Based on an Unsupervised Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Technique Using Multispectral T1w and T2w MR Imaging , 2017, Inf..

[47]  T. Borkowski,et al.  The limitations of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging also must be borne in mind , 2016, Central European journal of urology.

[48]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  MRI index lesion radiomics and machine learning for detection of extraprostatic extension of disease: a multicenter study , 2021, European Radiology.

[49]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[50]  Arturo Brunetti,et al.  MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Fuhrman Grade in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Machine Learning Exploratory Study , 2020, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[51]  Junkang Shen,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-observer Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers. , 2020, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  J. Tosoian,et al.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice , 2016, Nature Reviews Urology.

[53]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2020, European urology.

[54]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Improta Giovanni,et al.  Distinguishing Functional from Non-functional Pituitary Macroadenomas with a Machine Learning Analysis , 2019, IFMBE Proceedings.

[57]  Thomas J. Watson,et al.  An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier , 2001 .

[58]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[59]  S. Staibano,et al.  Prediction of Tumor Grade and Nodal Status in Oropharyngeal and Oral Cavity Squamous-cell Carcinoma Using a Radiomic Approach , 2019, AntiCancer Research.

[60]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.