The PRET A Rapporter framework: Evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work

The strongest tradition of IR systems evaluation has focused on system effectiveness; more recently, there has been a growing interest in evaluation of Interactive IR systems, balancing system and user-oriented evaluation criteria. In this paper we shift the focus to considering how IR systems, and particularly digital libraries, can be evaluated to assess (and improve) their fit with users' broader work activities. Taking this focus, we answer a different set of evaluation questions that reveal more about the design of interfaces, user-system interactions and how systems may be deployed in the information working context. The planning and conduct of such evaluation studies share some features with the established methods for conducting IR evaluation studies, but come with a shift in emphasis; for example, a greater range of ethical considerations may be pertinent. We present the PRET A Rapporter framework for structuring user-centred evaluation studies and illustrate its application to three evaluation studies of digital library systems.

[1]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Information search process of lawyers: a call for 'just for me' information services , 2001, J. Documentation.

[2]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Children's interaction with cross-cultural and multilingual digital libraries: I. Understanding interface design representations , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  George Buchanan,et al.  Supporting Information Structuring in a Digital Library , 2004, ECDL.

[4]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  A Comparative Transaction Log Analysis of Two Computing Collections , 2000, ECDL.

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Measuring Web Search Effectiveness: Rutgers at Interactive TREC , 2004 .

[7]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[8]  George Buchanan,et al.  Dynamic digital libraries for children , 2001, JCDL '01.

[9]  John Dowell,et al.  Information seeking and use by newspaper journalists , 2003, J. Documentation.

[10]  Emma L. Tonkin Proceedings of ECDL , 2007 .

[11]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[13]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  The Pragmatics of Information Retrieval Experimentation Revisited , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Social empowerment and exclusion: A case study on digital libraries , 2005, TCHI.

[15]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness , 1996, CHI.

[16]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Evaluation of the NSDL and Google for Obtaining Pedagogical Resources , 2005, ECDL.

[17]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Fast and Intuitive Clustering of Web Documents , 1997, KDD.

[18]  Nick Bryan-Kinns,et al.  Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study , 2001, JCDL '01.

[19]  A. Druin What Children Can Teach Us: Developing Digital Libraries for Children with Children1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[20]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information , 1995, CHI '95.

[21]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[22]  Anne Aula,et al.  User study on older adults’ use of the Web and search engines , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[23]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Completing a qualitative project : details and dialogue , 1998 .

[24]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[25]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Patterns of interactions: user behaviour in response to search results , 2002 .

[26]  Jean M. Tague,et al.  The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation , 1981 .

[27]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Anne Adams,et al.  Users' perception of privacy in multimedia communication , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  HCI, natural science and design: a framework for triangulation across disciplines , 1997, DIS '97.

[30]  Donna Harman,et al.  Information Processing and Management , 2022 .

[31]  Elaine Toms,et al.  WiIRE: the Web interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[33]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Greenstone: open-source digital library software with end-user collection building , 2001, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  B. Cesnik,et al.  Digital Libraries , 2001, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[35]  Anne Adams,et al.  Users' perceptions of privacy in multimedia communications , 2001 .

[36]  R. Pagano Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences , 1981 .

[37]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Acceptability of medical digital libraries , 2002 .

[39]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Ethics, lies and videotape… , 1995, CHI '95.

[40]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[41]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) , 2003 .

[42]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  Criteria For Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[44]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[45]  Taz Daughtrey,et al.  Software engineering code of ethics and professional practice , 2001 .

[46]  George Buchanan,et al.  Integrating information seeking and structuring: exploring the role of spatial hypertext in a digital library , 2004, HYPERTEXT '04.

[47]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[48]  Frank M. Shipman Seven Directions for Spatial Hypertext Research , 2001 .

[49]  Katriina Byström,et al.  Evaluation of an Information System in an Information Seeking Process , 2004, ECDL.

[50]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case study , 2004, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[51]  Dennis R. Wixon Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner , 2003, INTR.

[52]  David R. Karger,et al.  Scatter/Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[53]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. , 1993 .