Signal Fingerprint Anomaly Detection for Probabilistic Indoor Positioning

Signal fingerprinting is considered to be potential as the general indoor positioning solution since it does not require extra infrastructure or hardware modification to current customer smart devices. However, due to the complex nature of radio signal propagation, fingerprints are highly susceptible to both temporal and spatial indoor dynamics, rendering the positioning outcomes unreliable. Most recent works dedicated to efficient ways of building radio maps during the offline phase yet overlooked the localisability of fingerprints collected rather opportunistically at the online phase. In this paper, we introduce the use of pseudo-measurements and propose a fingerprint anomaly detection method that effectively evaluates the localisability of fingerprints while positioning. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that filtering out untrustworthy fingerprints can significantly improve the positioning accuracy.

[1]  Jesús Favela,et al.  Uncertainty Management in Context-Aware Applications: Increasing Usability and User Trust , 2011, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[2]  Robert Harle,et al.  Towards a crowdsourced radio map for indoor positioning system , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[3]  Masayuki Murata,et al.  Smartphone-based Indoor Localization for Blind Navigation across Building Complexes , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[4]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Mobility Increases Localizability , 2015, ACM Comput. Surv..

[6]  Saandeep Depatla,et al.  Crowd Counting Through Walls Using WiFi , 2017, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[7]  Andy Hopper,et al.  Implementing a Sentient Computing System , 2001, Computer.

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[9]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Location, Localization, and Localizability , 2010, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[10]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[11]  Robert Harle,et al.  Easing the survey burden: Quantitative assessment of low-cost signal surveys for indoor positioning , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[12]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Growing an organic indoor location system , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[13]  H. Jin Kim,et al.  Target Tracking and Classification from Labeled and Unlabeled Data in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2014, Sensors.

[14]  Fernando Seco,et al.  A survey of mathematical methods for indoor localization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[15]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[16]  Aboelmagd Noureldin,et al.  Dynamic Online-Calibrated Radio Maps for Indoor Positioning in Wireless Local Area Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Corrective Gradient Refinement for mobile robot localization , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Danping Zou,et al.  A Survey of Crowd Sensing Opportunistic Signals for Indoor Localization , 2016, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Robert Harle,et al.  Semi-Automated Signal Surveying Using Smartphones and Floorplans , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.