Sensitivity analysis of fusion power plant designs using the SYCOMORE system code

The next step after ITER is the demonstration of stable electricity production with a fusion reactor. Key design performances will have to be met by the corresponding power plant demonstrator (DEMO), fulfilling a large number of constraints. System codes such as SYCOMORE, by simulating all the fusion power plant subsystems , address those questions. To be able to perform design optimizations, simplified models relying on physical and technological assumptions have to be used, resulting in a large number of input parameters. As these parameters are not always exactly known, the impact of their associated uncertainties on final design performances has to be evaluated. Sensitivity methods, by measuring the relative influence of inputs on the figures of merit of the design, allow to select the dominant parameters. This information helps the search for optimal working points, guides the priority for technical improvements and finally allows selecting meaningful inputs for uncertainty propagation. A full set of sensitivity methods and their application on a ITER and a DEMO design will be presented, discussing both the statistical methods behaviors and the physical results. Plasma shape parameters (minor radius and plasma elongations) share half of the net electricity power sensitivity for the DEMO 2015 design while the toroidal magnetic field and the 95 % safety factor are responsible for 23% and 17% of the electric power sensitivity, respectively. The plasma minor radius is responsible for 45% of the pulse duration sensitivity for the DEMO 2015 design, while plasma physics parameters drive ∼ 37% of the pulse duration sensitivity.

[1]  P. Stangeby The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices , 2000 .

[2]  David Ward,et al.  “PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics , 2014 .

[3]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved confinement in JET high β plasmas with an ITER-like wall , 2015, 1501.03929.

[4]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Metis: a fast integrated tokamak modelling tool for scenario design , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[5]  Jean-Charles Jaboulay,et al.  Neutronic predesign tool for fusion power reactors system assessment , 2013 .

[6]  S. Malang,et al.  Fusion Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[7]  A. Loarte,et al.  Analysis of performance of the optimized divertor in ITER , 2009 .

[8]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[9]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[10]  Hong-Shuang Li,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization via high order response surface method , 2013 .

[11]  Jean Johner HELIOS: A Zero-Dimensional Tool for Next Step and Reactor Studies , 2011 .

[12]  L. Zani,et al.  Development and Applications of Magnet Module for SYCOMORE CEA System Code , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[13]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[14]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved Confinement in JET High Beta Plasmas with an ITER-Like Wall , 2015 .

[15]  T. Eich,et al.  Inter-ELM power decay length for JET and ASDEX upgrade: measurement and comparison with heuristic drift-based model. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[16]  Jean-Charles Jaboulay,et al.  Development of the breeding blanket and shield model for the fusion power reactors system SYCOMORE , 2014 .

[17]  Mario Paruggia,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2006 .

[18]  P. Sardain,et al.  DEMO design using the SYCOMORE system code: Influence of technological constraints on the reactor performances , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[19]  V. Parail,et al.  Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER , 2017, 1701.05507.

[20]  Art B. Owen,et al.  Sobol' Indices and Shapley Value , 2014, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[21]  J. Contributors,et al.  Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[22]  G. Arnaud,et al.  The Uranie platform: an open-source software for optimisation, meta-modelling and uncertainty analysis , 2018, EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies.

[23]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[24]  J. Morris,et al.  "PROCESS": a systems code for fusion power plants - Part 2:Engineering , 2016, 1601.06147.

[25]  G. Federici,et al.  Uncertainties in power plant design point evaluations , 2017 .

[26]  Tomonori Takizuka,et al.  Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER , 2008 .