Subsidence Reversal in a Re-established Wetland in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA

The stability of levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is threatened by continued subsidence of Delta peat islands. Up to 6 meters of land-surface elevation has been lost in the 150 years since Delta marshes were leveed and drained, primarily from oxidation of peat soils. Flooding subsided peat islands halts peat oxidation by creating anoxic soils, but net accumulation of new material in restored wetlands is required to recover land-surface elevations. We investigated the subsidence reversal potential of two 3 hectare, permanently flooded, impounded wetlands re-established on a deeply subsided field on Twitchell Island. The shallower wetland (design water depth 25 cm) was almost completely colonized by dense emergent marsh vegetation within two years; whereas, the deeper wetland (design water depth 55 cm) which developed spatially variable depths as a result of heterogeneous colonization by emergent vegetation, still had some areas remaining as open water after nine years. Changes in land-surface elevation were quantified using repeated sedimentation-erosion table measurements. New material accumulating in the wetlands was sampled by coring. Land-surface elevations increased by an average of 4 cm/yr in both wetlands from 1997 to 2006; however, the rates at different sites in the wetlands ranged from -0.5 to +9.2 cm/yr. Open water areas of the deeper wetland without emergent vegetation had the lowest rates of land-surface elevation gain. The greatest rates occurred in areas of the deeper wetland most isolated from the river water inlets, with dense stands of emergent marsh vegetation (tules and cattails). Vegetated areas of the deeper wetland in the transition zones between open water and mature emergent stands had intermediate rates of land-surface gain, as did the entire shallower wetland. These results suggest that the dominant component contributing to land-surface elevation gain in these wetlands was accumulation of organic matter, rather than mineral sediment, and that accumulation of organic matter in emergent marshes is strongly affected by hydrologic factors. Re-established, non-tidal wetlands with managed hydrology can produce significant increases in land-surface elevations, which can help to improve levee stability and protect subsided islands from future flooding.

[1]  D. Cahoon,et al.  Improved cryogenic coring device for sampling wetland soils , 1996 .

[2]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Organic soil subsidence , 1984 .

[3]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Patterns of short-term sedimentation in a freshwater created marsh. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  J. Day,et al.  High precision measurements of sediment elevation in shallow coastal areas using a sedimentation-erosion table , 1993 .

[5]  R. Fujii,et al.  Hydrologic Treatments Affect Gaseous Carbon Loss From Organic Soils, Twitchell Island, California, October 1995-December 1997 , 2000 .

[6]  Debbie Whitall,et al.  WETLANDS , 1995, Restoration & Management Notes.

[7]  W. G. Strand,et al.  How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise? , 2005, Science.

[8]  Paul L. G. Vlek,et al.  An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock , 2005 .

[9]  S. Wright,et al.  Estimating sediment budgets at the interface between rivers and estuaries with application to the Sacramento‐San Joaquin River Delta , 2005 .

[10]  D. Belknap,et al.  Tidal-Wetland Deposits of the Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, California , 1980 .

[11]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  Vertical Accretion in Microtidal Regularly and Irregularly Flooded Estuarine Marshes , 1993 .

[12]  D. Angeler,et al.  Sedimentation in the semi-arid freshwater wetland las tablas de Daimiel (Spain) , 2001, Wetlands.

[13]  J. Day,et al.  Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited , 1995 .

[14]  J. Day,et al.  High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation. I. Recent improvements to the sedimentation--erosion table , 2002 .

[15]  Berit Arheimer,et al.  Modelling nitrogen removal in potential wetlands at the catchment scale , 2002 .

[16]  Michael J. Vepraskas,et al.  Estimating primary and secondary subsidence in an organic soil 15, 20, and 30 years after drainage , 2006, Wetlands.

[17]  J. Overpeck,et al.  Paleoclimatic Evidence for Future Ice-Sheet Instability and Rapid Sea-Level Rise , 2006, Science.

[18]  D. Cahoon,et al.  Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils , 2003 .

[19]  P. Williams,et al.  Will Restored Tidal Marshes Be Sustainable , 2003 .

[20]  J. Gosselink,et al.  Relationships among Vertical Accretion, Coastal Submergence, and Erosion in a Louisiana Gulf Coast Marsh , 1983 .

[21]  David H. Schoellhamer,et al.  Trends in the Sediment Yield of the Sacramento River, California, 1957 - 2001 , 2004 .

[22]  Alfred C. Redfield,et al.  Development of a New England Salt Marsh , 1972 .

[23]  G. Chmura,et al.  Sedimentary and botanical factors influencing peat accumulation in the Mississippi Delta , 1987, Journal of the Geological Society.

[24]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Accumulation rates of organic matter associated with different successional stages from open water to carr forest in former turbaries , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[25]  J. Wösten,et al.  Peat subsidence and its practical implications: a case study in Malaysia , 1997 .

[26]  Stuart Rojstaczer,et al.  Subsidence of agricultural lands in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta, California: Role of aqueous and gaseous carbon fluxes , 1996 .

[27]  Michael J. Vepraskas,et al.  Wetlands, Third Edition , 2002 .

[28]  B. Arheimer,et al.  Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  R. Twilley,et al.  Improved Coring Device for Measuring Soil Bulk Density in a Louisiana Deltaic Marsh: RESEARCH METHOD PAPER , 1994 .

[30]  R. Delaune,et al.  Subsidence. accretion. and sea level rise in south San Francisco Bay marshes , 1990 .

[31]  T. Foin,et al.  The Role of Sedimentation in Estuarine Marsh Development within the San Francisco Estuary, California, USA , 2004 .

[32]  M. Fram,et al.  Organic Carbon and Disinfection Byproduct Precursor Loads from a Constructed, Non-Tidal Wetland in California's Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta , 2007 .

[33]  D. Reed Understanding Tidal Marsh Sedimentation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California , 2018, Journal of Coastal Research.

[34]  J. Gosselink,et al.  role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems , 1978 .

[35]  M. Goman,et al.  Trends in River Flow Affecting the Northeastern Reach of the San Francisco Bay Estuary over the Past 7000 Years , 2000, Quaternary Research.

[36]  D. Cahoon,et al.  Restoring marsh elevation in a rapidly subsiding salt marsh by thin-layer deposition of dredged material , 1999 .

[37]  R. Kuehl,et al.  Organic Matter Accumulation and Organic Soils , 2000 .

[38]  A. D. L. Cruz,et al.  In Situ Decomposition of Roots and Rhizomes of Two Tidal Marsh Plants , 1980 .

[39]  Jack J. Middelburg,et al.  Organic carbon isotope systematics of coastal marshes , 1997 .

[40]  P. Hensel,et al.  High-Precision Measurements of Wetland Sediment Elevation: II. The Rod Surface Elevation Table , 2002 .

[41]  D. Helsel,et al.  Statistical methods in water resources , 2020, Techniques and Methods.

[42]  A. Bloom Peat accumulation and compaction in a Connecticut coastal marsh , 1964 .

[43]  Carol A. Johnston,et al.  Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: effects on surface water quality , 1991 .

[44]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Sediment deposition patterns in restored freshwater wetlands using sediment traps , 1994 .

[45]  W. W. Weir Subsidence of peat lands of the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta, California. , 1950 .

[46]  S. Rojstaczer,et al.  Land subsidence in drained histosols and highly organic mineral soils of California , 1995 .

[47]  J. Price,et al.  Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: the case of a mined peatland , 1999 .

[48]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  The Biosphere and Man , 1975 .

[49]  J. Callaway,et al.  Sediment Accretion Rates from Four Coastal Wetlands Along the Gulf of Mexico , 1997 .

[50]  S. Nixon,et al.  Accretion rates and sediment accumulation in Rhode Island salt marshes , 1989 .

[51]  Jeffrey F. Mount,et al.  Subsidence, Sea Level Rise, and Seismicity in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta , 2005 .

[52]  L. Miller,et al.  Mass and volume contributions to twentieth-century global sea level rise , 2004, Nature.

[53]  D. Bossio,et al.  Alteration of soil microbial communities and water quality in restored wetlands , 2006 .

[54]  D. Cahoon,et al.  Accretion and canal impacts in a rapidly subsiding wetland II. Feldspar marker horizon technique , 1989 .

[55]  R. Wetzel Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems , 1975 .

[56]  I. Anderson,et al.  Sediment deposition and accretion in a Mid-Atlantic (U.S.A.) tidal freshwater marsh , 2002 .