The Influence of Multimedia on Improving the Comprehension of Organizational Information

Text is the predominant form of organizational information. Comprehending text-based information requires intensive cognitive processing effort on the part of readers. Drawing on multimedia literature, this study identified a characteristic of multimedia presentations, namely complementary cues, which have the potential to improve the comprehensibility of organizational information. A set of hypotheses about the benefits of multimedia over text-based presentations was generated based on the theoretical perspective that we developed. These predictions were tested through a laboratory experiment using a simulated multimedia intranet. Results show that multimedia facilitates the retention and subsequent recall of explanative information but not of descriptive information. Explanative information is organized facts connected by their underlying functional relationships. Descriptive information consists of isolated facts without an explanation of the relationships between these facts. The ability to retain and recall explanative information, in turn, leads to a greater ability to make correct inferences about new organizational situations.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  M Szczygiel.  Electronic document management. , 1983, Information management.

[3]  G. Salomon.  Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[4]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Effects of violating screen design principles of balance, unity, and focus on recall learning, study time, and completion rates , 1999 .

[5]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Study of Computer System Learning: Comparison of Co-Discovery and Self-Discovery Methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[9]  E. Crothers.  Paragraph Structure Inference , 1979 .

[10]  Gretchen Barbatsis,et al.  Hypermediated telepresence: Sensemaking aesthetics of the newest communication art , 1999 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Role of Multimedia in Changing First Impression Bias , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Robert B. Kozma.  The relationship between technology and design in educational technology research and development: A reply to richey , 2000 .

[13]  Examining the Cognitive Challenges and Pedagogical Opportunities of Integrated Media Systems: Toward a Research Agenda , 1993 .

[14]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[15]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[16]  Rita C. Richey.  Reflections on the state of educational technology research and development: A response to Kozma , 2000 .

[17]  Edmund J. Hansen.  Interactive video for reflection: learning theory and a new use of the medium , 1989 .

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? , 1979 .

[19]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[20]  R. Kozma.  Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[21]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[22]  John P. Wanous,et al.  A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. , 1985 .

[23]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[24]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[25]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Research and Theory on Multi-Media Learning Effects , 1992 .

[26]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[27]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[28]  Tim Cooper,et al.  Electronic document management. , 1983, Information management.

[29]  Ruth Drake,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 2001 .

[30]  V. Srinivasan Rao,et al.  Capturing stories in organizational memory systems: the role of multimedia , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Patricia Baggett.  6 Understanding Visual and Verbal Messages , 1989 .

[32]  Max Giardina.  Interactive multimedia learning environments : human factors and technical considerations on design issues , 1992 .

[33]  R. Schank.  The structure of episodes in memory , 1995 .

[34]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Imagery and deep structure in the recall of English nominalizations , 1971 .

[35]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[38]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[39]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Electronic Document Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Information Systems Managers , 1995, MIS Q..

[41]  Jane Webster,et al.  Audience engagement in multimedia presentations , 1997, DATB.

[42]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems , 2000, MIS Q..