Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa

An important step in the sea ice freeboard to thickness conversion is the classification of sea ice types, since the ice type affects the snow depth and ice density. Studies using Ku-band CryoSat-2 have shown promise in distinguishing FYI and MYI based on the parametrisation of the radar echo. Here, we investigate applying the same classification algorithms that have shown success for Ku-band measurements to measurements acquired by SARAL/AltiKa at the Ka-band. Four different classifiers are investigated, i.e., the threshold-based, Bayesian, Random Forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), by using data from five 35 day cycles during Arctic mid-winter in 2014–2018. The overall classification performance shows the highest accuracy of 93% for FYI (Bayesian classifier) and 39% for MYI (threshold-based classifier). For all classification algorithms, more than half of the MYI cover falsely classifies as FYI, showing the difference in the surface characteristics attainable by Ka-band compared to Ku-band due to different scattering mechanisms. However, high overall classification performance (above 90%) is estimated for FYI for three supervised classifiers (KNN, RF and Bayesian). Furthermore, the leading-edge width parameter shows potential in discriminating open water (ocean) and sea ice when visually compared with reference data. Our results encourage the use of waveform parameters in the further validation of sea ice/open water edges and discrimination of sea ice types combining Ka- and Ku-band, especially with the planned launch of the dual-frequency altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) in 2027.

[1]  Pierre Prandi,et al.  The Benefits of the Ka-Band as Evidenced from the SARAL/AltiKa Altimetric Mission: Quality Assessment and Unique Characteristics of AltiKa Data , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[2]  R. Wackerbauer,et al.  Regular network model for the sea ice-albedo feedback in the Arctic. , 2011, Chaos.

[3]  Marta Zygmuntowska,et al.  Waveform classification of airborne synthetic aperture radar altimeter over Arctic sea ice , 2013 .

[4]  Hajo Eicken,et al.  Comparison of sea-ice thickness measurements under summer and winter conditions in the Arctic using a small electromagnetic induction device , 1997 .

[5]  Raj Kumar,et al.  Concurrent Use of OSCAT and AltiKa to Characterize Antarctic Ice Surface Features , 2015 .

[6]  David Griffin,et al.  The SARAL/AltiKa Altimetry Satellite Mission , 2015 .

[7]  David J. Harding,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation , 2017 .

[8]  M. Holland,et al.  The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification , 2008 .

[9]  Lars M. H. Ulander,et al.  Sea ice altimetry , 2013 .

[10]  Fabrice Papa,et al.  ENVISAT radar altimeter measurements over continental surfaces and ice caps using the ICE-2 retracking algorithm , 2005 .

[11]  J. Yackel,et al.  The Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) high-priority candidate mission , 2020, The Cryosphere.

[12]  Laurent Rey,et al.  AltiKa: a Ka-band Altimetry Payload and System for Operational Altimetry during the GMES Period , 2006, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[13]  R. Gerdes,et al.  Classification of CryoSat-2 Radar Echoes , 2015 .

[14]  Seymour W. Laxon Sea Ice extent mapping using the ERS-1 radar altimeter , 1994 .

[15]  Andrey A. Kurekin,et al.  Retrieving Sea Level and Freeboard in the Arctic: A Review of Current Radar Altimetry Methodologies and Future Perspectives , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Anne W. Nolin,et al.  Arctic Sea Ice Surface Roughness Estimated from Multi-Angular Reflectance Satellite Imagery , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Eero Rinne,et al.  Utilisation of CryoSat-2 SAR altimeter in operational ice charting , 2016 .

[18]  Andrew Shepherd,et al.  Estimating Arctic sea ice thickness and volume using CryoSat-2 radar altimeter data , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[19]  Kevin Guerreiro,et al.  Potential for estimation of snow depth on Arctic sea ice from CryoSat-2 and SARAL/AltiKa missions , 2016 .

[21]  Sascha Willmes,et al.  Sea Ice Leads Detection Using SARAL/AltiKa Altimeter , 2015 .

[22]  Lars Kaleschke,et al.  Lead detection in Arctic sea ice from CryoSat-2: quality assessment, lead area fraction and width distribution , 2015 .

[23]  C. Haas,et al.  Sea-ice thickness variability in Storfjorden, Svalbard , 2011, Annals of Glaciology.

[24]  C. Ke,et al.  Discrimination of different sea ice types from CryoSat-2 satellite data using an Object-based Random Forest (ORF) , 2020, Marine Geodesy.

[25]  Rashmi Sharma,et al.  Estimation of Sea Ice Freeboard from SARAL/AltiKa Data , 2015 .