Predictive Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Aeroacoustics–Current Approach and Industrial Application

The major techniques for measuring jet noise have significant drawbacks, especially when including engine installation effects such as jet–flap interaction noise. Numerical methods including low order correlations and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) are known to be deficient for complex configurations and even simple jet flows. Using high fidelity numerical methods such as large eddy simulation (LES) allows conditions to be carefully controlled and quantified. LES methods are more practical and affordable than experimental campaigns. The potential to use LES methods to predict noise, identify noise risks, and thus modify designs before an engine or aircraft is built is a possibility in the near future. This is particularly true for applications at lower Reynolds numbers such as jet noise of business jets and jet-flap interaction noise for under-wing engine installations. Hence, we introduce our current approaches to predicting jet noise reliably and contrast the cost of RANS–numerical-LES (RANS–NLES) with traditional methods. Our own predictions and existing literature are used to provide a current guide, encompassing numerical aspects, meshing, and acoustics processing. Other approaches are also briefly considered. We also tackle the crucial issues of how codes can be validated and verified for acoustics and how LES-based methods can be introduced into industry. We consider that hybrid RANS–(N)LES is now of use to industry and contrast costs, indicating the clear advantages of eddy resolving methods.

[1]  Xiaoyu Yang,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation for Turbines: Methodologies, Cost and Future Outlooks , 2014 .

[2]  Paul G. Tucker,et al.  Modelling Velocity Correlations with LES and RANS for Prediction of Noise from Isothermal or Hot Jets , 2016 .

[3]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  A dynamic forcing method for unsteady turbulent inflow conditions , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  Far-field noise prediction for jets using large-eddy simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings method , 2016 .

[5]  C. Tinney,et al.  The near pressure field of co-axial subsonic jets , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  M. Shoeybi,et al.  On the Use of the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings Equation to Predict Far-Field Jet Noise from Large-Eddy Simulations , 2013 .

[7]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[8]  A. Uzun,et al.  Some Issues in Large-Eddy Simulations for Chevron Nozzle Jet Flows , 2012 .

[9]  James Bridges,et al.  Acoustic Efficiency of Azimuthal Modes in Jet Noise using Chevron Nozzles , 2006 .

[10]  D. L. Hawkings,et al.  Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion , 1969, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[11]  A. Dowling,et al.  Jet-Noise-Prediction Model for Chevrons and Microjets , 2016 .

[12]  Gilles Rahier,et al.  Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows , 2015 .

[13]  S. Lele,et al.  Current Status of Jet Noise Predictions Using Large-Eddy Simulation , 2008 .

[14]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Trapped acoustic waves in the potential core of subsonic jets , 2016 .

[15]  Elias Balaras,et al.  A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation , 2004 .

[16]  James Tyacke,et al.  Research data supporting "Large-Scale Multifidelity, Multiphysics, Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes/Large-Eddy Simulation of an Installed Aeroengine" , 2016 .

[17]  Paul G. Tucker,et al.  Contrasting code performances for computational aeroacoustics of jets , 2006 .

[18]  Christophe Airiau,et al.  Modal structure of a supersonic under-expanded jet , 2015 .

[19]  Guillaume Puigt,et al.  Hydrodynamic - Acoustic Filtering of a Supersonic Under-Expanded Jet , 2018 .

[20]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Influence of nozzle-exit boundary-layer conditions on the flow and acoustic fields of initially laminar jets , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Formulation of Kinetic Energy Preserving Conservative Schemes for Gas Dynamics and Direct Numerical Simulation of One-Dimensional Viscous Compressible Flow in a Shock Tube Using Entropy and Kinetic Energy Preserving Schemes , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[22]  Remi Manceau,et al.  Turbulent inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation based on low-order empirical model , 2008 .

[23]  Jean-François Boussuge,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Shock-Cell Noise From a Dual Stream Jet , 2016 .

[24]  T. Lund,et al.  Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations , 1998 .

[25]  H. Xia,et al.  Large-eddy simulations of chevron jet flows with noise predictions , 2009 .

[26]  F. Gand,et al.  Investigation of turbulence development in incompressible jets with zonal detached eddy simulation (ZDES) and synthetic turbulent inflow , 2016 .

[27]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[28]  C. Bailly,et al.  Numerical Solution of Acoustic Propagation Problems Using linearized Euler's Equations* , 2000 .

[29]  James Bridges,et al.  Establishing Consensus Turbulence Statistics for Hot Subsonic Jets , 2010 .

[30]  Paul G. Tucker,et al.  Differential equation-based wall distance computation for DES and RANS , 2003 .

[31]  Xin Yuan,et al.  Towards robust unstructured turbomachinery large eddy simulation , 2015 .

[32]  Paul G. Tucker,et al.  An assessment of far-field noise prediction for subsonic jets using large eddy simulation and Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings method , 2014 .

[33]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Influence of initial turbulence level on the flow and sound fields of a subsonic jet at a diameter-based Reynolds number of 105 , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  T. Poinsot Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[35]  P. Spalart,et al.  Noise Prediction for Increasingly Complex Jets. Part I: Methods and Tests , 2005 .

[36]  Sébastien Deck,et al.  Zonal Detached-Eddy Simulations of a Dual-Stream Jet , 2016 .

[37]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Large eddy simulation for jet noise: the importance of getting the boundary layer right , 2015 .

[38]  Vincent Brunet,et al.  Random Flow Generation Technique for Civil Aircraft Jet Simulations with the ZDES Approach , 2012 .

[39]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Advances in Numerical Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics , 1997 .

[40]  W. A. McMullan,et al.  Jet Noise: Acoustic Analogy informed by Large Eddy Simulation , 2010 .

[41]  Paul G. Tucker,et al.  Far Field Noise Prediction for Subsonic Hot and Cold Jets Using Large-Eddy Simulation , 2014 .

[42]  D. A. Lyubimov,et al.  Development and application of a high-resolution technique for jet flow computation using large eddy simulation , 2012 .

[43]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Perfectly Expanded Supersonic Jets Using an Unstructured Solver , 2012 .

[44]  D. Pullin,et al.  Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks , 2004 .

[45]  N. Sinha,et al.  LES Predictions of Jet Noise for a Pylon-Mounted Dual Stream Nozzle and Jet Surface Interactions , 2016 .

[46]  Christophe Airiau,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis applied to an under-expanded single jet , 2016 .

[47]  Soshi Kawai,et al.  Assessment of localized artificial diffusivity scheme for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[48]  C. Bogey Three-dimensional non-refrective boundary conditions for acoustic simulation : far field formulation and validation test cases , 2002 .

[49]  Sukumar Chakravarthy,et al.  Interfacing Statistical Turbulence Closures with Large-Eddy Simulation , 2004 .

[50]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  Computational analysis of nozzle geometry variations for subsonic turbulent jets , 2016 .

[51]  Roberto Camussi,et al.  Broadband Shock-cell Noise Signature Identification Using a Wavelet-based Method , 2016 .

[52]  S. Birch,et al.  A Review of Axisymmetric Jet Flow Data for Noise Applications , 2006 .

[53]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Towards best practices for jet noise predictions with unstructured large eddy simulations , 2012 .

[54]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows , 2015 .

[55]  James Tyacke,et al.  Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aero‐engines , 2015 .