A Quasi-DC Potential Drop Measurement System for Material Testing

Potential drop (PD) measurements are well established for use in materials testing and are commonly used for crack growth and strain monitoring. Traditionally, the experimenter has a choice between employing direct current (dc) or alternating current (ac), both of which have strengths and limitations. The dc measurements are afflicted by competing spurious dc signals and, therefore, require large measurement currents (tens or hundreds of amperes) to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, which in turn leads to the significant resistive Joule heating. The ac measurements have superior noise performance due to the utilization of phase-sensitive detection and a lower spectral noise density but are subject to the skin effect and are, therefore, not well suited to high-accuracy scientific studies of ferromagnetic materials. In this paper, a quasi-dc monitoring system is presented which uses very low-frequency (0.3–30-Hz) current which combines the positive attributes of both dc and ac while mitigating the negatives. Bespoke equipment has been developed that is capable of low-noise measurements in the demanding quasi-dc regime. A creep crack growth test and fatigue test are used to compare noise performance and measurement power against alternative DCPD equipment. The combination of the quasi-dc methodology and the specially designed electronics yields exceptionally low-noise measurements using typically 100–400 mA; at 400 mA, the quasi-dc system achieves a 13-fold improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared to a 25-A dc system. The reduction in measurement current from 25 A to 400 mA represents a ~3900-fold reduction in measurement power, effectively eliminating resistive heating and enabling much simpler experimental arrangements.

[1]  J. Grizzle,et al.  On numerical differentiation algorithms for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[2]  Christos Spitas,et al.  Real-time measurement of shear fatigue crack propagation at high-temperature using the potential drop technique , 2008 .

[3]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Investigation of drag effect using the field signature method , 2011 .

[4]  Kamran Nikbin,et al.  Predicting the influence of strain on crack length measurements performed using the potential drop method , 2017 .

[5]  M. C. Lugg Data interpretation in ACPD crack inspection , 1989 .

[6]  Junbi Liao,et al.  Novel Method for Sizing Metallic Bottom Crack Depth Using Multi-frequency Alternating Current Potential Drop Technique , 2015 .

[7]  Kamran Nikbin,et al.  Improvements in the measurement of creep crack initiation and growth using potential drop , 2017 .

[8]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Compensation of the Skin Effect in Low-Frequency Potential Drop Measurements , 2016, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation.

[9]  Benjamin Lenoir PREDICTING THE VARIANCE OF A MEASUREMENT WITH 1/f NOISE , 2013 .

[10]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Creep strain measurement using a potential drop technique , 2016 .

[11]  W. M. Thornton,et al.  The Measurement of the Thickness of Metal Walls from One Surface Only, by an Electrical Method* , 1938 .

[12]  A. Saxena Electrical potential technique for monitoring subcritical crack growth at elevated temperatures , 1980 .

[13]  A. R. Jack,et al.  The initiation of fatigue cracks from notches in mild steel plates , 1970 .

[14]  A. R. Ganji,et al.  Introduction to Engineering Experimentation , 1995 .

[15]  G. G. Garrett,et al.  Crack-growth monitoring: Optimisation of the electrical potential technique using an analogue method , 1971 .

[16]  Nicola Bowler,et al.  Four-point potential drop measurements for materials characterization , 2010 .

[17]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a directional potential drop sensor for creep monitoring , 2011 .

[18]  V. A. Zilberstein,et al.  Creep Testing of 2.25 Cr-1 Mo Welds by DC Potential Drop Technique , 1989 .

[19]  G. A. Webster,et al.  An Engineering Approach to the Prediction of Creep Crack Growth , 1986 .

[20]  Dominique Lesselier,et al.  Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation , 1999 .

[21]  W. D. Dover,et al.  Review of developments in ACPD and ACFM , 1991 .

[22]  M. Smith,et al.  Application of the ACFM inspection method to rail and rail vehicles , 2005 .

[23]  T V Venkatsubramanian,et al.  An AC potential drop system for monitoring crack length , 1984 .

[24]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[25]  Nicola Bowler,et al.  Theory of four-point alternating current potential drop measurements on a metal half-space , 2006 .

[26]  J. A. Connelly,et al.  Low noise electronic system design , 1993 .

[27]  R. M. Pelloux,et al.  Application of the dc potential drop technique in investigating crack initiation and propagation under sustained load in notched rupture tests , 1988 .

[28]  W. Lord Electromagnetic methods of defect detection , 1990, International Conference on Magnetics.

[29]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Potential drop mapping for the monitoring of corrosion or erosion , 2010 .

[30]  L. F. Coffin,et al.  The Reversing D-C Electrical Potential Method , 1985 .

[31]  J. Corcoran,et al.  Magnetic Stress Monitoring Using a Directional Potential Drop Technique , 2018, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation.

[32]  Richard L. Lloyd,et al.  The National Electrical Code , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[33]  Robert P. Wei,et al.  An Assessment of A-C and D-C Potential Systems for Monitoring Fatigue Crack Growth , 1981 .

[34]  C. Richards,et al.  A Simple and Sensitive Method of Monitoring Crack and Load in Compact Fracture Mechanics Specimens Using Strain Gages , 1979 .

[35]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Potential drop monitoring of creep damage at a weld , 2016 .

[36]  Clive Roberts,et al.  High-speed inspection of rails using ACFM techniques , 2009 .