Injectivity during PWRI and Disposal in Thick Low Permeable Formations (Laboratory and Mathematical Modelling, Field Case)

Produced water management is a growing challenge for oil and gas industry. Over the last decade, the scale of produced water re-injection (PWRI) and disposal in petroleum industry has increased tremendously. PWRI is an important economic and environmental-friendly option to convert waste to value with waterflooding. Nevertheless, drastic decline of injectivity, widely reported in the literature, restricts the project efficiency. In the present work, laboratory coreflood test using low permeable core sample is performed to investigate the impedance (normalised reciprocal of injectivity) behaviour. Analytical model for well impedance growth, along with probabilistic histograms of injectivity damage parameters, is applied to the well injectivity decline prediction during produced water disposal in a thick low permeable formation (Volkersen field). Unusual convex form of impedance curve is observed in both laboratory coreflooding and well behaviour modelling. Impedance grows slower during external cake formation compared to that during deep bed filtration. This is due to low reservoir permeability and consequent high values of filtration and formation damage coefficients causing fast impedance growth during deep bed filtration; while external cake build-up yields relatively slower impedance growth during cake formation. Risk analysis method using probabilistic histograms of injectivity damage parameters is applied to well behaviour prediction under high uncertainty conditions.

[1]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  A stochastic model for filtration of particulate suspensions with incomplete pore plugging , 2007 .

[2]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  A Model for Predicting Injectivity Decline in Water-Injection Wells , 1997 .

[3]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Stabilization of External Filter Cake by Colloidal Forces in a “Well–Reservoir” System , 2014 .

[4]  D. H. Davidson,et al.  Measuring Water Quality and Predicting Well Impairment , 1972 .

[5]  Zara Khatib,et al.  Prediction of Formation Damage Due to Suspended Solids: Modeling Approach of Filter Cake Buildup in Injectors , 1994 .

[6]  Andre Leibsohn Martins,et al.  Deep bed and cake filtration of two-size particle suspension in porous media , 2015 .

[7]  Z. You,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Non-Uniform External Cake Profile in Long Injection Wells , 2015 .

[8]  J. G. R. Eylander Suspended Solids Specifications for Water Injection From Coreflood Tests , 1988 .

[9]  David Rousseau,et al.  Injectivity Decline From Produced-Water Reinjection: New Insights on In-Depth Particle-Deposition Mechanisms , 2008 .

[10]  Rouhollah Farajzadeh,et al.  External filter cake erosion: mathematical model and experimental study , 2005 .

[11]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Characterisation of deep bed filtration system from laboratory pressure drop measurements , 2001 .

[12]  Eric van Oort,et al.  Impairment by Suspended Solids Invasion: Testing and Prediction , 1993 .

[13]  Jalel Ochi,et al.  External Filter Cake Properties During Injection of Produced Waters , 1999 .

[14]  D. Jiao,et al.  Mechanism of Cake Buildup in Crossflow Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions , 1994 .

[15]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Type Curves for Injectivity Decline , 2013 .

[16]  Z. You,et al.  Nonuniform External Filter Cake in Long Injection Wells , 2015 .

[17]  Peter K. Currie,et al.  Analysis of the Effect of Residual Oil on Particle Trapping During Produced-Water Reinjection Using X-Ray Tomography , 2010 .

[18]  P. Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Axi-Symmetric Two-Phase Suspension-Colloidal Flow in Porous Media during Water Injection , 2014 .

[19]  G. Chauveteau,et al.  Permeability Damage by Deposition of Colloidal Particles , 1997 .

[20]  Z. You,et al.  Pore size distribution from challenge coreflood testing by colloidal flow , 2012 .

[21]  L. Nabzar,et al.  Water Quality and Well Injectivity: Do Residual Oil-in-Water Emulsions Matter? , 2010 .

[22]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Well-history-based prediction of injectivity decline (accounting for oil-water mobility variation during waterflooding) , 2005 .

[23]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Injectivity Decline in Water-Injection Wells: An Offshore Gulf of Mexico Case Study , 2000 .

[24]  Zhenjiang You,et al.  Estimating filtration coefficients for straining from percolation and random walk theories , 2012 .

[25]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Incompressive cake filtration: Mechanism, parameters, and modeling , 1998 .

[26]  Rouhollah Farajzadeh,et al.  Modeling of External Filter Cake Build-up in Radial Geometry , 2009 .

[27]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  External Filter Cake Buildup in Dynamic Filtration:Mechanisms and Key Factors , 2014 .

[28]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  Effects of Oil-Water Mobility on Injectivity Impairment due to Suspended Particles , 2004 .

[29]  Zhenjiang You,et al.  Slow migration of mobilised fines during flow in reservoir rocks: Laboratory study , 2014 .

[30]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Analytical Models for Porous Media Impairment by Particles in Rectilinear and Radial Flows , 2005 .

[31]  Pavel Bedrikovetsky,et al.  A new method for injectivity impairment characterization from well and coreflood data , 2004 .