On the proposed role of metacognition in environment learning: recommendations for research

[1]  Ayanna K. Thomas,et al.  Thinking about thinking about thinking … & feeling: A model for metacognitive and meta-affective processes in task engagement. , 2022, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  Yuan-Ye Ma,et al.  Environmental cue difference and training duration modulate spatial learning and cue preference in detour task , 2022, International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience.

[3]  Timothy P McNamara,et al.  Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory , 2021, Psychological research.

[4]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Uncertainty promotes information-seeking actions, but what information? , 2020, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[5]  Thackery I. Brown,et al.  Stress Disrupts Human Hippocampal-Prefrontal Function during Prospective Spatial Navigation and Hinders Flexible Behavior , 2020, Current Biology.

[6]  T. McNamara,et al.  Bayesian decision theory and navigation , 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[7]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test , 2020, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge during wayfinding. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Renée DeCaro,et al.  How attributes and cues made accessible through monitoring affect self-regulated learning in older and younger adults , 2019, Journal of Memory and Language.

[10]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Risk-taking during wayfinding is modulated by external stressors and personality traits , 2019, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[11]  Alexander P. Boone,et al.  Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability , 2019, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  The acquisition of survey knowledge for local and global landmark configurations under time pressure , 2019, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[13]  H. Taylor,et al.  When to look at maps in navigation: metacognitive control in environment learning , 2018, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[14]  Kit S. Double,et al.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning , 2018, Memory.

[15]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Spatial decision dynamics during wayfinding: intersections prompt the decision-making process , 2018, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[16]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both? , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[17]  A. Bröder,et al.  Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning , 2018, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  The Path more Travelled: Time Pressure Increases Reliance on Familiar Route-Based Strategies during Navigation , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Cue combination in human spatial navigation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  I. Dobbins,et al.  Ignoring Memory Hints: The Stubborn Influence of Environmental Cues on Recognition Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  T. Tenbrink,et al.  Orientation and metacognition in virtual space. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Ford Burles,et al.  Environmental layout complexity affects neural activity during navigation in humans , 2016, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  Christopher A. Stevens,et al.  Are you sure the library is that way? Metacognitive monitoring of spatial judgments. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Mark C. Fox,et al.  When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention , 2015, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[26]  J. D. Smith,et al.  The interplay between uncertainty monitoring and working memory: Can metacognition become automatic? , 2015, Memory & Cognition.

[27]  William H Warren,et al.  How You Get There From Here , 2015, Psychological science.

[28]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Judgments of learning as memory modifiers. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Ágoston Török,et al.  Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Local and Global Reference Frames for Environmental Spaces , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  How Navigational Aids Impair Spatial Memory: Evidence for Divided Attention , 2013, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[32]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of graph knowledge. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes , 2013, Cognition.

[34]  Mingming Zhou.  University student’s goal profiles and metacomprehension accuracy , 2013 .

[35]  Jonathan G Tullis,et al.  Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  I. Dobbins,et al.  Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  H. Smallman,et al.  Choosing and using geospatial displays: effects of design on performance and metacognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[38]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Using the Past to Predict the Future? , 2011, Science.

[39]  Alessandro O. Caffò,et al.  Besides navigation accuracy: Gender differences in strategy selection and level of spatial confidence , 2011 .

[40]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Reference frames during the acquisition and development of spatial memories , 2010, Cognition.

[41]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use , 2010 .

[42]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal‐Oriented map study , 2009 .

[43]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Emotional state and local versus global spatial memory. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[45]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation , 2008, Cognition.

[47]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Metacomprehension A Brief History and How to Improve Its Accuracy , 2007 .

[48]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Brianna Scott,et al.  Navigational spatial displays: The role of metacognition as cognitive load * , 2007 .

[50]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[51]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[54]  John Dunlosky,et al.  What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses , 2005 .

[55]  Bruce C. Howard,et al.  The Influence of Metacognitive Skills on Learners' Memory of Information in a Hypermedia Environment , 2004 .

[56]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[59]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments , 2002 .

[60]  R. De Beni,et al.  Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals , 2001 .

[61]  K. Thiede.  The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  J. Tuovinen,et al.  A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples , 1999 .

[63]  H. Taylor,et al.  Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[64]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[65]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[66]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[67]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Uncertain responses by humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same-different task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[68]  Mark D. Kroll,et al.  The illusion of knowing, error detection, and motivational orientations , 1992 .

[69]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[70]  T. Blaxton.  Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[71]  Anthony J. Aretz.  A Model of Electronic Map Interpretation , 1988 .

[72]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[73]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[74]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Remembering the levels of information in words , 1978 .

[75]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[76]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Taking different perspectives on a story. , 1977 .

[77]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[78]  Stevens,et al.  Is Simpler Always Better? Effects of Perceptual Detail and Viewpoint on Spatial Cognition and Metacognition , 2019, The American Journal of Psychology.

[79]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation , 2018, Memory & cognition.

[80]  J. Bittner,et al.  Cognitive Research : Principles and Implications , 2017 .

[81]  Carole L. Yue,et al.  Achievement goals affect metacognitive judgments. , 2016, Motivation science.

[82]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Going to town: Visualized perspectives and navigation through virtual environments , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[84]  Bernard N'Kaoua,et al.  Transfer of spaTial-knowledge from virTual To real environmenT : effecT of acTive / passive learning depending on a TesT-reTesT procedure and The Type of reTrieval TesTs , 2010 .

[85]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[86]  Holly A. Taylor,et al.  Goal-Directed Effects on Processing a Spatial Environment , 2002 .

[87]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Generation Effects With Nonwords : The Role of Test Appropriateness , 2001 .

[88]  David W. Fendrich,et al.  Recognition benefits from the reinstatement of a spatial representation of motoric processing , 1998, Psychological research.

[89]  S. Levinson.  Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[90]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[91]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[92]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[93]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. , 1980 .

[94]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.