Conditional and marginal performance of the Poisson CUSUM control chart with parameter estimation

Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) type control charts are widely used in industry because of their effectiveness for process control. The Poisson CUSUM is a powerful and easy-to-implement control chart, which is appropriate for monitoring the counts of nonconformities in a unit from a repetitive production process. In the literature, control chart performances are generally evaluated under the assumption of known in-control process parameters. However, in-control process parameters are rarely known in practice and often parameter estimates from a reference sample are used instead. As a consequence of the additional variability introduced by parameter estimation, operational performance of a control chart might differ from the expected performance when the parameters are known. In this paper, effect of estimated process mean on the conditional and marginal performance of the Poisson CUSUM chart are quantified. The Markov Chain approach is used for calculating the aspects of the run length distribution. The effect of estimation on the in-control average run length performance is shown to be significant. Sample-size recommendations are provided.

[1]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process Control , 1999 .

[2]  W. John Braun Run length distributions for estimated attributes charts , 1999 .

[3]  Karen A. F. Copeland Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement , 1999 .

[4]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  ARLs and Higher-Order Run-Length Moments for the Poisson CUSUM , 1996 .

[5]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  POISSON CUSLTM VERSUS c CHART FOR DEFECT DATA , 1997 .

[6]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  The Performance of Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Charts With Estimated Parameters , 2001, Technometrics.

[7]  James M. Lucas,et al.  Counted Data CUSUM's , 1985 .

[8]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[9]  D. A. Evans,et al.  An approach to the probability distribution of cusum run length , 1972 .

[10]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Poisson EWMA Control Charts , 1998 .

[11]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Reference Values and Estimated Variance on the Arl of Cusum Tests , 1975 .

[12]  Murat Caner Testik,et al.  The Effect of Estimated Parameters on Poisson EWMA Control Charts , 2006 .

[13]  Michael S. Hamada Bayesian tolerance interval control limits for attributes , 2002 .

[14]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  The Run Length Distribution of the CUSUM with Estimated Parameters , 2004 .

[15]  S. W. Roberts,et al.  Control Chart Tests Based on Geometric Moving Averages , 2000, Technometrics.

[16]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.

[17]  Elisabeth J. Umble,et al.  Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement , 2001, Technometrics.