论文信息 - EMPIRICAL RESEARCH AND SOME MAJOR SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON FREE PRESS/FAIR TRIAL CONFLICTS - 字舞流文

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH AND SOME MAJOR SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON FREE PRESS/FAIR TRIAL CONFLICTS

Wayne M. Towers

[1] Harry T. Reis,et al. Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[2] A. B. Sohn. Determining Guilt or Innocence of Accused from Pretrial News Stories , 1976 .

[3] S. Sue,et al. Authoritarianism, Pretrial Publicity, and Awareness of Bias in Simulated Jurors , 1975, Psychological reports.

[4] M. M. Connors. Prejudicial Publicity: An Assessment. Journalism Monographs No. 41. , 1975 .

[5] Lloyd K. Stires,et al. The Effect of Several Types of Pretrial Publicity on the Guilt Attributions of Simulated Jurors1 , 1973 .

[6] Sam G. Riley. Pretrial Publicity: A Field Study , 1973 .

[7] Thomas E. Eimermann,et al. Newspaper Coverage of Crimes and Trials: Another Empirical Look at the Free Press—Fair Trial Controversy , 1970 .

[8] Bryce W. Rucker. What Solutions Do People Endorse in Free Press-Fair Trial Dilemma? , 1967 .

[9] S. Chaffee,et al. Pretrial Publicity and Juror Prejudice , 1966 .

[10] F. Kline,et al. Prejudicial Publicity: Its Effect on Law School Mock Juries , 1966 .

[11] Marlowe Froke,et al. Canon 35 as viewed by the Illinois Judiciary , 1958 .

[12] Fred S. Siebert,et al. Free press and fair trial : some dimensions of the problem , 1970 .

[13] Donald M. Gillmor. Free press and fair trial , 1966 .