Should we routinely measure portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis, using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as a guide for prophylaxis and therapy of bleeding and rebleeding? No.

Portal hypertension (PH) is a severe complication of liver cirrhosis. Measurement of the degree of portal hypertension is usually performed by measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) which is the difference between the free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) and the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHPG). The HVPG accurately reflects the degree of PH in the majority of liver diseases. PH is defined by an increase of HVPG values above the normal upper limit of 5 mm Hg, while clinically significant PH is defined by an HVPG to ≥10 mm Hg. Although measurement of HVPG potentially has several applications, in clinical practice its major use has been related to the assessment of hemodynamic response to pharmacological therapy, in order to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and to predict the risk of rebleeding from esophageal varices. When properly performed, HVPG is a reliable, safe and good predictive tool in the management of portal hypertension. However, the need for appropriate equipment, sufficient and reliable operators and costs, have discouraged its use outside Liver Units specifically devoted to the clinical management of portal hypertension. This has diminished its applicability. Combining its use with transjugular liver biopsy and using the prognostic value of HVPG may help encourage its use.

[1]  J. Miñana,et al.  Maintenance of hemodynamic response to treatment for portal hypertension and influence on complications of cirrhosis. , 2004, Journal of hepatology.

[2]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  A Comparison of Four- Versus Three-Pass Transjugular Biopsy Using a 19-G Tru-Cut Needle and a Randomized Study Using a Cassette to Prevent Biopsy Fragmentation , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[3]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Assessment of therapeutic benefit of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: is hepatic venous pressure gradient a better end point? , 2002, Gut.

[4]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure measurement: An old test as a new prognostic marker in cirrhosis? , 1997, Hepatology.

[5]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Assessment of the agreement between wedge hepatic vein pressure and portal vein pressure in cirrhotic patients. , 2005, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[6]  X. Cussó,et al.  Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate compared with sclerotherapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in alcoholic cirrhosis: a 10-year prospective study. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[8]  D. Patch,et al.  Monitoring target reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient during pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension: a close look at the evidence , 2003, Gut.

[9]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient to assess fibrosis and its progression after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis , 2007, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[10]  J. Vinel,et al.  “A la carte” treatment of portal hypertension: Adapting medical therapy to hemodynamic response for the prevention of bleeding , 2002, Hepatology.

[11]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review. , 2007, Journal of hepatology.

[12]  P. Arcidiacono,et al.  Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study , 1988 .

[13]  J. Rodés,et al.  Hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and long‐term prognosis of cirrhosis , 2003, Hepatology.

[14]  J. Boadas,et al.  Endoscopic ligation compared with combined treatment with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Review article: the therapeutic and prognostic benefit of portal pressure reduction in cirrhosis , 2008, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[16]  N. Mcintyre,et al.  Clinical vs haemodynamic response to drugs in portal hypertension. , 1998, Journal of hepatology.

[17]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Infection, coagulation, and variceal bleeding in cirrhosis , 2005, Gut.

[18]  J. Bosch,et al.  Pharmacological Reduction of Portal Pressure and Long-Term Risk of First Variceal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[19]  F. Nevens,et al.  Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. García‐Pagán,et al.  Prevention of variceal rebleeding , 2003, The Lancet.

[21]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Altered intestinal function precedes the appearance of bacterial DNA in serum and ascites in patients with cirrhosis: a pilot study , 2010, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[22]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Systematic review of HVPG measurement: statistics versus clinical applicability. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[23]  S. Friedman,et al.  Now there are many (stages) where before there was one: In search of a pathophysiological classification of cirrhosis , 2010, Hepatology.

[24]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: Optimal measurement is key , 2010, Hepatology.

[25]  Angelo Luca,et al.  Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[26]  B. González,et al.  Clinical trial: a randomized controlled study on prevention of variceal rebleeding comparing nadolol + ligation vs. hepatic venous pressure gradient‐guided pharmacological therapy , 2009, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[27]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage. , 1990, Gastroenterology.

[28]  Ramon Planas,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[29]  Laura Marelli,et al.  A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[30]  M. Rössle,et al.  Early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding , 2010, Hepatology.

[31]  C. Sabin,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of medical therapy versus endoscopic ligation for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[32]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Current management of portal hypertension. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[33]  R. Makuch,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. , 2009, Journal of hepatology.

[34]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Targeting portal pressure measurements: A critical reappraisal , 2004, Hepatology.

[35]  J. Rodés,et al.  Relation between portal pressure response to pharmacotherapy and risk of recurrent variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis , 1995, The Lancet.

[36]  A. Gatta,et al.  The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis , 2000, Hepatology.

[37]  A. Burroughs,et al.  How to prevent varices from bleeding: shades of grey--the case for nonselective beta blockers. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[38]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  β‐Blockers protect against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: a meta‐analysis , 2009, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[39]  J. Llach,et al.  Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension , 2000, Hepatology.

[40]  R. Franchis,et al.  Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. , 2005, Journal of hepatology.