Does functional redundancy exist

Functional redundancy has often been assumed as an intuitive null hypothesis in biodiversity experiments, but theory based on the classical Lotka-Volterra competition model shows that functional redundancy sensu stricto is incompatible with stable coexistence. Stable coexistence requires differences between species which lead to functional complementarity and differences between the yields of mixtures and monocultures. Only a weaker version of functional redundancy, i.e. that mixture yields lie within the range of variation of monoculture yields, is compatible with stable coexistence in Lotka-Volterra systems. Spatial and temporal environmental variability may provide room for functional redundancy at small spatial and temporal scales, but is not expected to do so at the larger scales at which environmental variations help maintain coexistence. Neutral coexistence of equivalent competitors, non-linear per capita growth rates, and lack of correlation between functional impact and biomass may provide the basis for the existence of functional redundancy in natural ecosystems. Overall, there is a striking parallel between the conditions that allow stable coexistence and those that allow overyielding.

[1]  A. Hastings Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[2]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[4]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[5]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Reinterpretation of the Invalidation of the Principle of Competitive Exclusion , 1972, Nature.

[8]  M. Loreau,et al.  erratum: Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[9]  O. Petchey Species Diversity, Species Extinction, and Ecosystem Function , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[10]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[11]  V. Jansen,et al.  Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversity , 2002 .

[12]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[13]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[14]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation , 2002 .

[15]  KRIS H. JOHNSON,et al.  Trophic‐dynamic considerations in relating species diversity to ecosystem resilience , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[17]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Redundancy in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[18]  S. Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of plant species with similar niches , 1984, Vegetatio.

[19]  J. P. Grime,et al.  No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. , 2000, Science.

[20]  M. Loreau,et al.  Overyielding in grassland communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments , 2002 .

[21]  John Vandermeer,et al.  The Ecology of Intercropping by John H. Vandermeer , 1989 .

[22]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[23]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments , 1998 .

[24]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[25]  Charles Ashbacher,et al.  An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology , 2003 .

[26]  A. Hector The effect of diversity on productivity : detecting the role of species complementarity , 1998 .

[27]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Peter Chesson,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL NICHES AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING , 2006 .

[29]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  IS SPACE NECESSARY? INTERFERENCE COMPETITION AND LIMITS TO BIODIVERSITY , 2000 .

[30]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[32]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[33]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[34]  M. Loreau,et al.  Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters , 2002 .

[35]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[36]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[37]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.