1. ABSTRACT An innovative health care information system has been developed recently to share patient health care information among several competing hospitals in the greater Dayton area. An evaluation of this system by three main user/developer groups -physicians, medical records personnel, and IS personnel -is reported in a recent study [4]. In this paper, we examine responses of heads and non-heads of each of these three groups separately. The examination leads to four lessons that reinforce and extend the findings the earlier study. 2. INTRODUCTION To cope with escalating health care costs, health care providers have begun to examine the possibility of developing interorganizational information systems. A recent example is the Community Patient Health Information Network (CPHIN), developed to support the sharing of patient information across seven competing hospitals in the greater Dayton area. A brief history of this project is furnished below; further details of various aspects of the project may be found elsewhere [4], [5], and [6].
[1]
Andrew Clement,et al.
A retrospective look at PD projects
,
1993,
CACM.
[2]
Prabuddha De,et al.
An information system involving competing organizations
,
1998,
CACM.
[3]
Albert L. Lederer,et al.
Swords and plowshares: Information technology for collaborative advantage
,
1996,
Inf. Manag..
[4]
Blake Ives,et al.
An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction
,
1986,
CACM.
[5]
Erran Carmel,et al.
PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison
,
1993,
CACM.