Drivers of Technology Adoption - the Case of Nanomaterials in Building Construction

With the building and construction sector contributing significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, there is great demand for resource- and energy-efficient construction materials. Manufactured nanotechnology products (MNPs) are expected to realize resource and energy efficiency through performance improvements in the strength, lightness and insulating properties of construction materials. However, the actual adoption of MNPs has lagged. This article examines how the construction sector in the United States assesses MNPs for adoption. Through patent analysis and interviews, we gauge the supply of MNPs and identify actors' roles in technology adoption. Results indicate that awareness of MNPs is more extensive than anticipated. Yet, MNP adoption is limited by a multi-component technology assessment process focused primarily on the technology’s applicability to project-based outcomes. We conclude that barriers to MNP adoption can be overcome through intermediary activities such as product certification, comprehensive technology assessments, and “real-world” demonstrations.

[1]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[2]  Geraldine Ryan,et al.  Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance , 2012 .

[3]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  Ivan Amato,et al.  Report to the President and Congress on the Third Assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. , 2010 .

[5]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Jan Youtie,et al.  The use of environmental, health and safety research in nanotechnology research. , 2011, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[7]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[8]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[9]  P. J. M. Bartos,et al.  Nanotechnology in Construction: A Roadmap for Development , 2008, SP-254: Nanotechnology of Concrete: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives.

[10]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[11]  G. D. Stefano,et al.  Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions , 2012 .

[12]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Appraisal of policy instruments for reducing buildings' CO2 emissions , 2007 .

[13]  K. Frenken,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[14]  Sui-Hua Yu,et al.  Social capital, absorptive capability, and firm innovation , 2013 .

[15]  O. Williamson.  Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations , 1973 .

[16]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-industry technology flows in the United States , 1993 .

[17]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[18]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Co-evolutionary scenarios: An application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology , 2009 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook , 2011 .

[21]  Pablo del Río,et al.  The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems , 2013 .

[22]  Mark Doroba,et al.  More Than Architecture , 2011 .

[23]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Machine Tools: The Remaking of a Traditional Sectoral Innovation System , 2004 .

[24]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[25]  Jonatan Pinkse,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Sustainability: An Explanation of Residential Builders' Reluctance to Adopt Clean Technologies , 2009 .

[26]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[27]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies , 2013 .

[28]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[29]  Lucy C . Williams.  The Pragmatic Approach to Green Design: Achieving LEED Certification from an Architect's Perspective , 2010 .

[30]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[31]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Patterns of nanotechnology innovation and governance within a metropolitan area , 2013 .

[32]  Wenzhong Zhu,et al.  Application of nanotechnology in construction , 2004 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[34]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[35]  Mia Ala-Juusela,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers , 2009 .

[36]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[37]  Manu Venugopal,et al.  Nanotechnology and Its Impact on Construction: Bridging the Gap between Researchers and Industry Professionals , 2012 .

[38]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[39]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[40]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Nanotechnology in the City: Sustainability Challenges and Anticipatory Governance , 2013 .

[41]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[42]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[43]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[44]  Pedro J. J. Alvarez,et al.  Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. , 2010, ACS nano.

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[46]  John Holmberg,et al.  Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis , 2007 .

[47]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.

[48]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[50]  Leonard Sweet,et al.  Nanotechnology—Life-Cycle Risk Management , 2006 .

[51]  Sascha Peters.  Material Revolution: Sustainable and Multi-Purpose Materials for Design and Architecture , 2011 .

[52]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Green nanotechnology in Nordic Construction: Eco-innovation strategies and Dynamics in Nordic Window Value Chains , 2010 .