Measuring core reduction using 3D flake scar density: A test case of changing core reduction at Klasies River Mouth, South Africa

A new core reduction index is presented, calculated as the ratio of flake scar number to 3D surface area (SDI). The index is tested experimentally on five types of core (blade, discoid, Levallois, biface and multiplatform cores) and then applied to the core assemblages from five sub-stages of the Middle Stone Age at Klasies River Mouth, South Africa. Preliminary results indicate that the SDI possesses the desirable attributes of a successful reduction index and is a significant improvement on traditional proxy measures of core reduction. The results of the archaeological case study confirm previous untested observations that cores from the Howiesons Poort and MSAIII sub-stages are more heavily reduced than preceding and following stages, and that local and exotic raw materials as well as different types of cores are all more heavily reduced during these periods. The SDI fills a significant lacuna in available core reduction measures.

[1]  H. Dibble,et al.  New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation , 1981 .

[2]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  The Measurement and Interpretation of Cortex in Lithic Assemblages , 2005, American Antiquity.

[3]  M. Lombard,et al.  Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64 000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa , 2010, Antiquity.

[4]  B. Blades.  End Scraper Reduction and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility , 2003, American Antiquity.

[5]  C. Stringer.  The emergence of modern humans. , 1990, Scientific American.

[6]  Z. Jacobs,et al.  Ages for the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa: Implications for Human Behavior and Dispersal , 2008, Science.

[7]  J. Morrow.  End Scraper Morphology and Use-Life: An Approach for Studying Paleoindian Lithic Technology And Mobility , 1997 .

[8]  S. Wurz.  Variability in the Middle Stone Age Lithic Sequence, 115,000–60,000 Years Ago at Klasies River, South Africa , 2002 .

[9]  H. Dibble.  Middle paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date , 1995 .

[10]  D. Gordon.  Mousterian Tool Selection, Reduction, and Discard at Ghar, Israel , 1993 .

[11]  Grant S. McCall,et al.  Behavioral ecological models of lithic technological change during the later Middle Stone Age of South Africa , 2007 .

[12]  Andrew W. Pelcin.  The Threshold Effect of Platform Width: A Reply to Davis and Shea , 1998 .

[13]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force , 2009 .

[14]  P. Hiscock,et al.  Change in the Australian desert culture: a reanalysis of tulas from Puntutjarpa , 1991 .

[15]  Jamie L. Clark,et al.  Animal exploitation strategies during the South African Middle Stone Age: Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort fauna from Sibudu Cave. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[16]  Peter Hiscock,et al.  Retouched Notches at Combe Grenal (France) and the Reduction Hypothesis , 2007, American Antiquity.

[17]  C. Clarkson.  An Index of Invasiveness for the Measurement of Unifacial and Bifacial Retouch: A Theoretical, Experimental and Archaeological Verification , 2002 .

[18]  Matthew Douglass,et al.  The application of 3D laser scanning technology to the assessment of ordinal and mechanical cortex quantification in lithic analysis , 2010 .

[19]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .

[20]  H. Dibble.  The Interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Scraper Morphology , 1987, American Antiquity.

[21]  Barbara J. Roth,et al.  Notched Tool Reuse and Raw Material Availability in French Middle Paleolithic Sites , 1996, American Antiquity.

[22]  Andrew P. Bradbury,et al.  Flake Size from Platform Attributes: Predictive and Empirical Approaches , 2000 .

[23]  G. Dusseldorp.  Tracking the influence of technological change on Middle Stone Age hunting strategies in South Africa , 2012 .

[24]  Steven L. Kuhn,et al.  Defining and measuring reduction in unifacial stone tools , 2005 .

[25]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts , 2008 .

[26]  M. Eren,et al.  Kuhn's Geometric Index of Unifacial Stone Tool Reduction (GIUR) : does it measure missing flake mass? , 2009 .

[27]  P. Beaumont,et al.  The Middle Stone Age at Klasies River Mouth in South Africa , 1982 .

[28]  Andrew W. Pelcin.  The Effect of Core Surface Morphology on Flake Attributes: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment , 1997 .

[29]  Peter Hiscock,et al.  Estimating original flake mass from 3D scans of platform area , 2011 .

[30]  Andrew W. Pelcin.  The Formation of Flakes: The Role of Platform Thickness and Exterior Platform Angle in the Production of Flake Initiations and Terminations , 1997 .

[31]  Nicholas J. Conard,et al.  Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts , 2012 .

[32]  B. Marwick.  What attributes are important for the measurement of assemblage reduction intensity? Results from an experimental stone artefact assemblage with relevance to the Hoabinhian of mainland Southeast Asia , 2008 .

[33]  M. Meadows,et al.  Evidence for progressive Holocene aridification in southern Africa recorded in Namibian hyrax middens: Implications for African Monsoon dynamics and the ‘‘African Humid Period’’ , 2010, Quaternary Research.

[34]  C. Shipton.  A million years of hominin sociality and cognition : Acheulean bifaces in the Hunsgi-Baichbal Valley, India , 2013 .

[35]  Andrew W. Pelcin.  The Effect of Indentor Type on Flake Attributes: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment , 1997 .

[36]  P. Hiscock,et al.  Generalization, inference and the quantification of lithic reduction , 2010 .

[37]  C. M. Barton.  Lithic variability and middle Paleolithic behaviour : new evidence from the Iberian Peninsula , 1988 .

[38]  C. Clarkson,et al.  Experimental evaluation of Kuhn's geometric index of reduction and the flat-flake problem , 2005 .

[39]  Chris Clarkson,et al.  Regional diversity within the core technology of the Howiesons Poort techno-complex , 2010 .

[40]  A. Mackay,et al.  Big debates over little tools: ongoing disputes over microliths on three continents , 2011 .

[41]  C. Shipton.  Taphonomy and Behaviour at the Acheulean Site of Kariandusi, Kenya , 2011 .

[42]  C. Stringer,et al.  Development of Middle Stone Age innovation linked to rapid climate change , 2013, Nature Communications.

[43]  J. Shea,et al.  Experimental use and quantitative performance analysis of triangular flakes (Levallois points) used as arrowheads , 2009 .

[44]  Steven L. Kuhn,et al.  A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools , 1990 .

[45]  P. Villa,et al.  The Howiesons Poort and MSA III at Klasies River main site, Cave 1A , 2010 .

[46]  E. Starnini,et al.  The prehistoric flint mines at Jhimpir in Lower Sindh (Pakistan) , 2010 .

[47]  H. Deacon.  Southern Africa and modern human origins. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  Peter Hiscock,et al.  The reality of reduction experiments and the GIUR: reply to Eren and Sampson , 2009 .

[49]  J. Deacon.  An Unsolved Mystery at the Howieson's Poort Name Site , 1995 .

[50]  L. Wadley.  Were snares and traps used in the Middle Stone Age and does it matter? A review and a case study from Sibudu, South Africa. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.