Use of attainable regions for synthesis and optimization of multistage anaerobic digesters

Abstract Anaerobic digestion involves multiple reactions, and when operated as a single stage, the process conditions are only suitable for all the reactions with no particular reaction being optimized, hence limiting overall performance. Multistage anaerobic digestion, in which multiple digesters are operated in a network are designed to optimize each process reaction, but very few writers have drawn on any systematic procedure for the design of digester networks. This study is about multistage digester networks, but contrary to traditional multistage digestion articles that focus on the experimental evaluation of a predefined network configuration, this study develops a systematic methodological framework based on the concept of attainable regions for optimal synthesis of digester networks. Within the framework, a simplified model is developed, which accounts for the geometric characteristics of fundamental anaerobic digester types. The model is validated with experimental data of diary, horse, goat, chicken and swine manure, and shows good agreement (model errors between 0.01 and 0.06). The attainable regions and their optimized parameters differ for each digested substrate, and the optimal networks are made of different combinations of digesters operated in a continuous (axial mixing) and/or plug flow (no axial mixing) mode. This substrate effect on attainable regions shows great promises as it paves the way for other substrates such as food waste, lignocellulosic waste, co-digested feeds, etc. This study though preliminary presents a breakthrough in extending the use of digester networks to solve more operational challenges as well as support retrofitting multi-stage systems into facilities where single-stage digesters already exist.

[1]  D. T. Hill Simplified monod kinetics of methane fermentation of animal wastes , 1983 .

[2]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Application of attainable region theory to batch reactors , 2013 .

[3]  Lide Chen,et al.  Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. , 2016, Waste management.

[4]  Yen Wah Tong,et al.  Three-stage anaerobic digester for food waste , 2017 .

[5]  Jianlong Wang,et al.  Effect of temperature on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures , 2008 .

[6]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Attainable Region Theory: An Introduction to Choosing an Optimal Reactor , 2016 .

[7]  G. Nakhla,et al.  Single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of extruded lignocellulosic biomass , 2016 .

[8]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[9]  A. Stams,et al.  Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes , 2003 .

[10]  Irini Angelidaki Anaerobic digestion in Denmark. Past, present and future , 1997 .

[11]  Jingwei Ma,et al.  Mathematical Modeling in Anaerobic Digestion (AD) , 2013 .

[12]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Biological Wastewater Treatment: Principles, Modeling and Design , 2015 .

[13]  A. N. Stokes,et al.  Model for bacterial culture growth rate throughout the entire biokinetic temperature range , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  Damien J. Batstone,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Anaerobic Reactors Treating Domestic Wastewater: Rational Criteria for Model Use , 2006 .

[15]  R. K. Srivastava,et al.  Sequencing batch reactor technology for biological wastewater treatment: a review , 2011 .

[16]  Hisham Hafez,et al.  Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for the treatment of thin stillage. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Joseph S. Alford,et al.  Bioprocess control: Advances and challenges , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  J. M. Lewis,et al.  Dynamic Data Assimilation: A Least Squares Approach , 2006 .

[19]  Tushar Kanti Sen,et al.  The performance enhancements of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for domestic sludge treatment--a state-of-the-art review. , 2012, Water research.

[20]  Jose M. Pinto,et al.  Optimal synthesis of anaerobic digester networks , 2009 .

[21]  Germán Aroca,et al.  Attainable region analysis for continuous production of second generation bioethanol , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[22]  Yung-Tse Hung,et al.  Biosolids Treatment Processes , 2007 .

[23]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Experimental Simulation of Three-Dimensional Attainable Region for the Synthesis of Exothermic Reversible Reaction: Ethyl Acetate Synthesis Case Study , 2015 .

[24]  Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet, Multi-Stage Anaerobic Digestion , 2006 .

[25]  Yongzhong Feng,et al.  Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion , 2015 .