Consolidation behavior of soil–cement column improved ground

Abstract Columnar inclusion is one of the effective and widely used methods for improving the engineering properties of soft clay ground. This article investigates the consolidation behavior of composite soft clay ground using both physical model tests under an axial-symmetry condition and finite element simulations using the PLAXIS 2D program. It was determined that the final settlement and the rate of consolidation of the composite ground depended on the stress state. For an applied stress that is much lower than the failure stress, the final settlement of the composite ground was lower, and the consolidation was rapid. When the soil–cement column failed, the stress on the column suddenly decreased (due to strain-softening); meanwhile, the stress on the soil increased to maintain the force equilibrium. Consequently, the excess pore pressure in the surrounding clay increased immediately. The cracked soil–cement column acted as a drain, which accelerated the dissipation of the excess pore pressure. The consolidation of the composite ground was mainly observed in the vertical direction and was controlled by the area ratio, which is the ratio of the diameter of the soil–cement column to the diameter of the composite ground, a . The stress on the column was shown to be low for a composite ground with a high value of a , which resulted in less settlement and fast consolidation. For a long soil–cement column, the excess pore pressures in the surrounding clay and the column were essentially the same at a given consolidation time throughout the improvement depth. It is proposed that the soil–cement column and surrounding clay form a compressible ground, and the consolidation occurs in the vertical direction. The composite coefficient of consolidation ( c v ( com ) ) that was obtained from the physical model test on the composite ground can be used to approximate the rate of consolidation. This approximation was validated via a finite element simulation. The proposed method is highly useful to geotechnical engineers because of its simplicity and reliable prediction.

[1]  Thiam-Soon Tan,et al.  Properties of Singapore marine clays improved by cement mixing , 2002 .

[2]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Modified Structured Cam Clay: A generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays , 2010 .

[3]  Avirut Chinkulkijniwat,et al.  STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT IN CEMENT ADMIXED BANGKOK CLAY: LABORATORY AND FIELD INVESTIGATIONS , 2011 .

[4]  Ing Hieng Wong,et al.  USE OF DEEP CEMENT MIXING TO REDUCE SETTLEMENTS AT BRIDGE APPROACHES , 1999 .

[5]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  ENGINEERING BEHAVIOR OF CEMENT STABILIZED CLAY AT HIGH WATER CONTENT , 2001 .

[6]  Prabhata K. Swamee,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL METHOD FOR CONSOLIDATION-COEFFICIENT , 1977 .

[7]  Yung-Show Fang,et al.  Properties of soil-cement stabilised with deep mixing method , 2001 .

[8]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  A method for predicting consolidation settlements of floating column improved clayey subsoil , 2010 .

[9]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  A critical state model for overconsolidated structured clays , 2011 .

[10]  Hiroyuki Tanaka,et al.  Settlement analysis for deep mixing method , 1983 .

[11]  S. Hansbo Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains , 1981 .

[12]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high water content clays with Abrams' law as a basis , 2003 .

[13]  A. Porbaha,et al.  State of the art in construction aspects of deep mixing technology , 2001 .

[14]  Bengt B. Broms,et al.  LIME COLUMNS - A NEW FOUNDATION METHOD , 1979 .

[15]  S. Horpibulsuk,et al.  Assessment of strength development in blended cement admixed Bangkok clay , 2011 .

[16]  A. Porbaha,et al.  State of the art in quality assessment of deep mixing technology , 2002 .

[17]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Simple Method of Modeling PVD-Improved Subsoil , 2001 .

[18]  Norihiko Miura,et al.  Analysis of strength development in deep mixing: a field study , 2004 .

[19]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Undrained Shear Behavior of Cement Admixed Clay at High Water Content , 2004 .

[20]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Clay–Water∕Cement Ratio Identity for Cement Admixed Soft Clays , 2005 .

[21]  Kiyonobu Kasama,et al.  ON THE STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHTLY CEMENTED CLAY BASED ON AN EXTENDED CRITICAL STATE CONCEPT , 2000 .

[22]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Strength development in blended cement admixed saline clay , 2012 .

[23]  J. Yin,et al.  Physical modelling of consolidation behaviour of a composite foundation consisting of a cement-mixed soil column and untreated soft marine clay , 2006 .

[24]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Compressibility of cement-admixed clays at high water content , 2004 .

[25]  Deepa S. Liyanapathirana,et al.  Behaviour of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of the Structured Cam Clay model , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew D. Walker DSM Saves the Dam , 1994 .