Archaeology in Three Dimensions: Computer-Based Methods in Archaeological Research

This article reviews the activities at the Computerized Archaeology Laboratory at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where techniques and ideas from computer science (e.g., computer graphics, machine learning, etc.) are integrated into archaeological research methodologies. The laboratory operates optical scanners which provide 3D digital models that are then analyzed by computer programs developed in-house. These programs address research issues and needs which could not be tackled without the availability of digital 3D models, thus broadening the horizons of archaeological research. To date, these methods and applications have been applied successfully to more than 30,000 pottery fragments, 3,000 stone tools, and many other archaeological finds submitted by more than 100 expeditions. This level of integration provides daily verification of the 3D approach and its intellectual and economical advantages.

[1]  Ofer Bar-Yosef,et al.  The lithic assemblages of 'Ubeidiya : a lower palaeolithic site in the Jordan Valley , 1993 .

[2]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  Computerized morphological classification of ceramics , 2011 .

[3]  Ilan Shimshoni,et al.  Computer-based, automatic recording and illustration of complex archaeological artifacts , 2013 .

[4]  Hanan Ginat,et al.  Early pleistocene lake deposits and Lower Paleolithic finds in Nahal (wadi) Zihor, Southern Negev desert, Israel , 2003, Quaternary Research.

[5]  U. Smilansky,et al.  3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory , 2008 .

[6]  Leore Grosman,et al.  A case of techno-typological lithic variability & continuity in the late Lower Palaeolithic , 2011 .

[7]  Naama Goren-Inbar,et al.  The biface assemblage from Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel: illuminating patterns in “Out of Africa” dispersal , 2001 .

[8]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts , 2008 .

[9]  Yardenna Alexandre,et al.  The 'Hippo' Jar and Other Storage Jars at Hurvat Rosh Zayit , 1995 .

[10]  Naama Goren-Inbar,et al.  Culture and cognition in the Acheulian industry: a case study from Gesher Benot Yaʿaqov , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition , 2010 .

[12]  E. Hovers,et al.  Organization of lithic technology at 'Ein Qashish, a late Middle Paleolithic open-air site in Israel , 2014 .

[13]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  Studying post depositional damage on Acheulian bifaces using 3-D scanning. , 2011, Journal of Human Evolution.

[14]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  Morphological Analysis of Nahal Zihor Handaxes: A Chronological Perspective , 2011 .

[15]  Avshalom Karasik,et al.  Quantitative analysis of shape attributes based on contours and section profiles in artifact analysis , 2005 .

[16]  D. Ben‐Shlomo,et al.  The Smithsonian Institution excavation at Tell Jemmeh, Israel,1970-1990 , 2014 .

[17]  Avshalom Karasik,et al.  Differentiation of ceramic chemical element composition and vessel morphology at a pottery production center in Roman Galilee , 2009 .